串联闭塞情况下紧急颈动脉支架植入术的抗血小板方案简介。系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gianluca De Rubeis , Luca Prosperini , Stefano Badia , Sebastiano Fabiano , Luca Bertaccini , Andrea Wlderk , Francesca Romana Pezzella , Valeria Caso , Luca Saba , Enrico Pampana
{"title":"串联闭塞情况下紧急颈动脉支架植入术的抗血小板方案简介。系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Gianluca De Rubeis ,&nbsp;Luca Prosperini ,&nbsp;Stefano Badia ,&nbsp;Sebastiano Fabiano ,&nbsp;Luca Bertaccini ,&nbsp;Andrea Wlderk ,&nbsp;Francesca Romana Pezzella ,&nbsp;Valeria Caso ,&nbsp;Luca Saba ,&nbsp;Enrico Pampana","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate the optimum antiplatelet therapy regimen (APTR) for emergent carotid artery stenting following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients with tandem occlusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed on Pubmed/OVID/Cochran's CENTRAL database for studies from 2015 to 2022. Patient characteristics, antiplatelet regimen type, mTICI, 90 days-mRS, acute in-stent thrombosis (AIST), mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and sample size were recorded. Exclusion criteria were non-English literature, sample size &lt; 5 patients, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, and 100 % stent insertion in one study arm. The studies were assessed using MINORS/GRADE. Meta-analysis and meta-regression with a random effects model were performed. The outcomes were: 90 days-mRS, death, AIST and ICH</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-hundred-twenty-four studies were retrieved. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final population included 19/534 studies (3.6 %) for 880 patients (46.3 per article). I^2 and Q’s Cochrane were 86.4 % and 132.5 for mRS, 19.9 % and 17.5 for death, 0 % and 9.4 for acute in-stent thrombosis and 62.1 % and 39.7 for intra-cranial haemorrhages, respectively.</div><div>Patients in the aspirin subgroup had a significantly lower rate of functional independence (mRS≤2) than those in the DAPT subgroup (47 % [CI95 % 42.0 %-52.0 %] vs. 61.9 % [CI95 % 50.8–72.9]; p=0.0007;OR 0.75[CI95 % 0.56–1.01], p=0.06). DAPT significantly decreased the death rate compared with aspirin (8.6 % [CI95 % 5.3 %-11.9 %] vs. 16.7 % [CI95 11.1 %-22.2 %]; p=0.0012). Anti-GPIIb/IIIa demonstrated a trend of increasing the probability of mortality versus DAPT (OR 1.88[CI95 % 0.93–3.86], p=0.08.</div><div>No significant differences were observed between AIST and ICH in the treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DAPT may increases the chance of obtaining an mRS score ≤2 and reduces mortality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"247 ","pages":"Article 108595"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Profile of antiplatelet regimens for emergent carotid stenting in tandem occlusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca De Rubeis ,&nbsp;Luca Prosperini ,&nbsp;Stefano Badia ,&nbsp;Sebastiano Fabiano ,&nbsp;Luca Bertaccini ,&nbsp;Andrea Wlderk ,&nbsp;Francesca Romana Pezzella ,&nbsp;Valeria Caso ,&nbsp;Luca Saba ,&nbsp;Enrico Pampana\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To investigate the optimum antiplatelet therapy regimen (APTR) for emergent carotid artery stenting following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients with tandem occlusion.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A literature search was performed on Pubmed/OVID/Cochran's CENTRAL database for studies from 2015 to 2022. Patient characteristics, antiplatelet regimen type, mTICI, 90 days-mRS, acute in-stent thrombosis (AIST), mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and sample size were recorded. Exclusion criteria were non-English literature, sample size &lt; 5 patients, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, and 100 % stent insertion in one study arm. The studies were assessed using MINORS/GRADE. Meta-analysis and meta-regression with a random effects model were performed. The outcomes were: 90 days-mRS, death, AIST and ICH</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Five-hundred-twenty-four studies were retrieved. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final population included 19/534 studies (3.6 %) for 880 patients (46.3 per article). I^2 and Q’s Cochrane were 86.4 % and 132.5 for mRS, 19.9 % and 17.5 for death, 0 % and 9.4 for acute in-stent thrombosis and 62.1 % and 39.7 for intra-cranial haemorrhages, respectively.</div><div>Patients in the aspirin subgroup had a significantly lower rate of functional independence (mRS≤2) than those in the DAPT subgroup (47 % [CI95 % 42.0 %-52.0 %] vs. 61.9 % [CI95 % 50.8–72.9]; p=0.0007;OR 0.75[CI95 % 0.56–1.01], p=0.06). DAPT significantly decreased the death rate compared with aspirin (8.6 % [CI95 % 5.3 %-11.9 %] vs. 16.7 % [CI95 11.1 %-22.2 %]; p=0.0012). Anti-GPIIb/IIIa demonstrated a trend of increasing the probability of mortality versus DAPT (OR 1.88[CI95 % 0.93–3.86], p=0.08.</div><div>No significant differences were observed between AIST and ICH in the treatment groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>DAPT may increases the chance of obtaining an mRS score ≤2 and reduces mortality.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\"247 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108595\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004827\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724004827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究串联闭塞的脑卒中患者在接受机械血栓切除术(MT)后紧急进行颈动脉支架植入术的最佳抗血小板治疗方案(APTR):在Pubmed/OVID/Cochran's CENTRAL数据库中对2015年至2022年的研究进行了文献检索。记录了患者特征、抗血小板方案类型、mTICI、90 天-mRS、急性支架内血栓形成(AIST)、死亡率、颅内出血(ICH)和样本量。排除标准为:非英语文献、样本量小于 5 例患者、接受过其他抗凝剂/抗血小板治疗、在一个研究臂中 100% 植入支架。研究采用 MINORS/GRADE 进行评估。采用随机效应模型进行了元分析和元回归。研究结果包括结果:共检索到 524 项研究。应用排除标准后,最终纳入 19/534 项研究(3.6%),涉及 880 名患者(每篇文章 46.3 名患者)。mRS的I^2和Q's Cochrane分别为86.4%和132.5,死亡的I^2和Q's Cochrane分别为19.9%和17.5,急性支架内血栓形成的I^2和Q's Cochrane分别为0%和9.4,颅内出血的I^2和Q's Cochrane分别为62.1%和39.7。阿司匹林亚组患者的功能独立率(mRS≤2)明显低于DAPT亚组患者(47 % [CI95 % 42.0 %-52.0 %] vs. 61.9 % [CI95 % 50.8-72.9]; p=0.0007;OR 0.75 [CI95 % 0.56-1.01], p=0.06)。与阿司匹林相比,DAPT能明显降低死亡率(8.6% [CI95 % 5.3 %-11.9 %] vs. 16.7 % [CI95 11.1 %-22.2 %]; p=0.0012)。抗 GPIIb/IIIa 与 DAPT 相比,有增加死亡率概率的趋势(OR 1.88[CI95 % 0.93-3.86],P=0.08。在治疗组中,AIST 和 ICH 之间无明显差异:结论:DAPT可增加mRS评分≤2分的机会,并降低死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Profile of antiplatelet regimens for emergent carotid stenting in tandem occlusion. Systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim

To investigate the optimum antiplatelet therapy regimen (APTR) for emergent carotid artery stenting following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in stroke patients with tandem occlusion.

Methods

A literature search was performed on Pubmed/OVID/Cochran's CENTRAL database for studies from 2015 to 2022. Patient characteristics, antiplatelet regimen type, mTICI, 90 days-mRS, acute in-stent thrombosis (AIST), mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), and sample size were recorded. Exclusion criteria were non-English literature, sample size < 5 patients, other anticoagulant/antiplatelet therapy, and 100 % stent insertion in one study arm. The studies were assessed using MINORS/GRADE. Meta-analysis and meta-regression with a random effects model were performed. The outcomes were: 90 days-mRS, death, AIST and ICH

Results

Five-hundred-twenty-four studies were retrieved. After applying the exclusion criteria, the final population included 19/534 studies (3.6 %) for 880 patients (46.3 per article). I^2 and Q’s Cochrane were 86.4 % and 132.5 for mRS, 19.9 % and 17.5 for death, 0 % and 9.4 for acute in-stent thrombosis and 62.1 % and 39.7 for intra-cranial haemorrhages, respectively.
Patients in the aspirin subgroup had a significantly lower rate of functional independence (mRS≤2) than those in the DAPT subgroup (47 % [CI95 % 42.0 %-52.0 %] vs. 61.9 % [CI95 % 50.8–72.9]; p=0.0007;OR 0.75[CI95 % 0.56–1.01], p=0.06). DAPT significantly decreased the death rate compared with aspirin (8.6 % [CI95 % 5.3 %-11.9 %] vs. 16.7 % [CI95 11.1 %-22.2 %]; p=0.0012). Anti-GPIIb/IIIa demonstrated a trend of increasing the probability of mortality versus DAPT (OR 1.88[CI95 % 0.93–3.86], p=0.08.
No significant differences were observed between AIST and ICH in the treatment groups.

Conclusion

DAPT may increases the chance of obtaining an mRS score ≤2 and reduces mortality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信