利用生态学瞬间评估预测术前急性术后焦虑症和抑郁症:对单中心前瞻性观察研究的二次分析。

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Eli Aminpour, Katherine J Holzer, Madelyn Frumkin, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Caroline Jones, Simon Haroutounian, Bradley A Fritz
{"title":"利用生态学瞬间评估预测术前急性术后焦虑症和抑郁症:对单中心前瞻性观察研究的二次分析。","authors":"Eli Aminpour, Katherine J Holzer, Madelyn Frumkin, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Caroline Jones, Simon Haroutounian, Bradley A Fritz","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative anxiety and depression can negatively affect surgical outcomes and patient wellbeing. This study aimed to quantify the incidence of postoperative worsening anxiety and depression symptoms and to identify preoperative predictors of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational cohort study included 1168 patients undergoing surgery lasting >1 h with overnight admission at a university-affiliated quaternary referral centre. Postoperative anxiety and depression symptoms were measured using standardised, thrice-daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) for 30 days. Co-primary outcomes were worsening anxiety and depression symptoms, each defined as a slope >0 when EMA was modelled as a linear function of time. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent preoperative predictors of each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative worsening anxiety occurred in 60 patients (5%), and postoperative worsening depression occurred in 86 patients (7%). Predictors of postoperative worsening of anxiety symptoms included preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.48, 95% credible interval [CI] 1.29-4.79, for mild symptoms; aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.10-4.51, for moderate to severe symptoms), and preoperative pain (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.32-9.12). Predictors of postoperative worsening depression symptoms included preoperative PROMIS depression symptoms (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.24-4.14, for mild symptoms; aOR 3.79, 95% CI 2.10-6.81, for moderate to severe symptoms). Self-reported history of anxiety or depression did not independently predict either outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative worsening anxiety and depression appear to be associated more closely with preoperative active mental health or pain symptoms rather than self-reported history of these conditions. Preoperative identification of at-risk patients will require screening for symptoms rather than simple history taking.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preoperative predictors of acute postoperative anxiety and depression using ecological momentary assessments: a secondary analysis of a single-centre prospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Eli Aminpour, Katherine J Holzer, Madelyn Frumkin, Thomas L Rodebaugh, Caroline Jones, Simon Haroutounian, Bradley A Fritz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative anxiety and depression can negatively affect surgical outcomes and patient wellbeing. This study aimed to quantify the incidence of postoperative worsening anxiety and depression symptoms and to identify preoperative predictors of these conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, observational cohort study included 1168 patients undergoing surgery lasting >1 h with overnight admission at a university-affiliated quaternary referral centre. Postoperative anxiety and depression symptoms were measured using standardised, thrice-daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) for 30 days. Co-primary outcomes were worsening anxiety and depression symptoms, each defined as a slope >0 when EMA was modelled as a linear function of time. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent preoperative predictors of each outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative worsening anxiety occurred in 60 patients (5%), and postoperative worsening depression occurred in 86 patients (7%). Predictors of postoperative worsening of anxiety symptoms included preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.48, 95% credible interval [CI] 1.29-4.79, for mild symptoms; aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.10-4.51, for moderate to severe symptoms), and preoperative pain (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.32-9.12). Predictors of postoperative worsening depression symptoms included preoperative PROMIS depression symptoms (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.24-4.14, for mild symptoms; aOR 3.79, 95% CI 2.10-6.81, for moderate to severe symptoms). Self-reported history of anxiety or depression did not independently predict either outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative worsening anxiety and depression appear to be associated more closely with preoperative active mental health or pain symptoms rather than self-reported history of these conditions. Preoperative identification of at-risk patients will require screening for symptoms rather than simple history taking.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British journal of anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.035\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.08.035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后焦虑和抑郁会对手术效果和患者健康产生负面影响。本研究旨在量化术后焦虑和抑郁症状恶化的发生率,并确定这些症状的术前预测因素:这项前瞻性、观察性队列研究共纳入了 1168 名在一所大学附属的四级转诊中心接受手术且手术时间超过 1 小时并住院过夜的患者。术后焦虑和抑郁症状采用标准化的生态瞬间评估(EMA)进行测量,为期30天,每天三次。焦虑和抑郁症状的恶化是共同的主要结果,当 EMA 被模拟为时间的线性函数时,焦虑和抑郁症状的斜率均大于 0。为确定每种结果的独立术前预测因素,进行了多变量逻辑回归:结果:60 名患者(5%)出现术后焦虑症恶化,86 名患者(7%)出现术后抑郁症恶化。术后焦虑症状恶化的预测因素包括术前患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)焦虑症状(轻度症状的调整赔率[aOR]为2.48,95%可信区间[CI]为1.29-4.79;中度至重度症状的调整赔率[aOR]为2.22,95%可信区间[CI]为1.10-4.51)和术前疼痛(调整赔率[aOR]为3.46,95%可信区间[CI]为1.32-9.12)。术后抑郁症状恶化的预测因素包括术前 PROMIS 抑郁症状(轻度症状的 aOR 为 2.26,95% CI 为 1.24-4.14;中重度症状的 aOR 为 3.79,95% CI 为 2.10-6.81)。自我报告的焦虑或抑郁史并不能独立预测这两种结果:结论:术后焦虑症和抑郁症的恶化似乎与术前活跃的心理健康或疼痛症状密切相关,而不是与自述的这些病史有关。术前识别高危患者需要进行症状筛查,而不是简单的病史采集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preoperative predictors of acute postoperative anxiety and depression using ecological momentary assessments: a secondary analysis of a single-centre prospective observational study.

Background: Postoperative anxiety and depression can negatively affect surgical outcomes and patient wellbeing. This study aimed to quantify the incidence of postoperative worsening anxiety and depression symptoms and to identify preoperative predictors of these conditions.

Methods: This prospective, observational cohort study included 1168 patients undergoing surgery lasting >1 h with overnight admission at a university-affiliated quaternary referral centre. Postoperative anxiety and depression symptoms were measured using standardised, thrice-daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) for 30 days. Co-primary outcomes were worsening anxiety and depression symptoms, each defined as a slope >0 when EMA was modelled as a linear function of time. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent preoperative predictors of each outcome.

Results: Postoperative worsening anxiety occurred in 60 patients (5%), and postoperative worsening depression occurred in 86 patients (7%). Predictors of postoperative worsening of anxiety symptoms included preoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) anxiety symptoms (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.48, 95% credible interval [CI] 1.29-4.79, for mild symptoms; aOR 2.22, 95% CI 1.10-4.51, for moderate to severe symptoms), and preoperative pain (aOR 3.46, 95% CI 1.32-9.12). Predictors of postoperative worsening depression symptoms included preoperative PROMIS depression symptoms (aOR 2.26, 95% CI 1.24-4.14, for mild symptoms; aOR 3.79, 95% CI 2.10-6.81, for moderate to severe symptoms). Self-reported history of anxiety or depression did not independently predict either outcome.

Conclusions: Postoperative worsening anxiety and depression appear to be associated more closely with preoperative active mental health or pain symptoms rather than self-reported history of these conditions. Preoperative identification of at-risk patients will require screening for symptoms rather than simple history taking.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信