乳腺筛查中的风险分层研讨会。

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Andrew Anderson, Cristina Visintin, Antonis Antoniou, Nora Pashayan, Fiona J Gilbert, Allan Hackshaw, Rikesh Bhatt, Harry Hill, Stuart Wright, Katherine Payne, Gabriel Rogers, Bethany Shinkins, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Rosalind Given-Wilson
{"title":"乳腺筛查中的风险分层研讨会。","authors":"Andrew Anderson, Cristina Visintin, Antonis Antoniou, Nora Pashayan, Fiona J Gilbert, Allan Hackshaw, Rikesh Bhatt, Harry Hill, Stuart Wright, Katherine Payne, Gabriel Rogers, Bethany Shinkins, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Rosalind Given-Wilson","doi":"10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Population screening for breast cancer (BC) is currently offered in the UK for women aged 50 to 71 with the aim of reducing mortality. There is additional screening within the national programme for women identified as having a very high risk of BC. There is growing interest in further risk stratification in breast screening, which would require a whole population risk assessment and the subsequent offer of screening tailored to the individual's risk. Some women would be offered more intensive screening than others or no screening. This might provide a better balance of screening benefits and harms for each individual than the current population age-based programme alone. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is considering using decision-analytic and other models to evaluate different risk stratification screening strategies and identify remaining gaps in evidence. This paper reports the proceedings of a UK NSC workshop where experts in the field discussed both risk prediction models, as well as decision-analytic models providing a benefit-harm analysis/economic evaluation of risk-stratified screening programmes (see Table 1). The aim of the meeting was to present and discuss the current work of experts, including some data which had not been published at the time of the meeting, to inform the UK NSC. The workshop was not intended to present a balanced evaluation of how to deliver screening in future. Areas for further work identified included methods for comparing models to assess accuracy, the optimum risk assessment tools, the digital screening infrastructure, acceptability of stratification, choice of screening test and reducing inequalities. A move to risk stratification of the whole programme would require a careful phased introduction with continuing assessment of real-world evidence during deployment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9046,"journal":{"name":"BMC Proceedings","volume":"18 Suppl 19","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500431/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk stratification in breast screening workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Anderson, Cristina Visintin, Antonis Antoniou, Nora Pashayan, Fiona J Gilbert, Allan Hackshaw, Rikesh Bhatt, Harry Hill, Stuart Wright, Katherine Payne, Gabriel Rogers, Bethany Shinkins, Sian Taylor-Phillips, Rosalind Given-Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Population screening for breast cancer (BC) is currently offered in the UK for women aged 50 to 71 with the aim of reducing mortality. There is additional screening within the national programme for women identified as having a very high risk of BC. There is growing interest in further risk stratification in breast screening, which would require a whole population risk assessment and the subsequent offer of screening tailored to the individual's risk. Some women would be offered more intensive screening than others or no screening. This might provide a better balance of screening benefits and harms for each individual than the current population age-based programme alone. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is considering using decision-analytic and other models to evaluate different risk stratification screening strategies and identify remaining gaps in evidence. This paper reports the proceedings of a UK NSC workshop where experts in the field discussed both risk prediction models, as well as decision-analytic models providing a benefit-harm analysis/economic evaluation of risk-stratified screening programmes (see Table 1). The aim of the meeting was to present and discuss the current work of experts, including some data which had not been published at the time of the meeting, to inform the UK NSC. The workshop was not intended to present a balanced evaluation of how to deliver screening in future. Areas for further work identified included methods for comparing models to assess accuracy, the optimum risk assessment tools, the digital screening infrastructure, acceptability of stratification, choice of screening test and reducing inequalities. A move to risk stratification of the whole programme would require a careful phased introduction with continuing assessment of real-world evidence during deployment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"18 Suppl 19\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11500431/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12919-024-00306-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国目前为 50 至 71 岁的妇女提供乳腺癌(BC)人群筛查,目的是降低死亡率。在国家计划中,还为被确定为乳腺癌高危人群的妇女提供额外筛查。人们对乳腺筛查中的进一步风险分层越来越感兴趣,这需要对整个人群进行风险评估,然后根据个人风险提供筛查。一些妇女将接受比其他妇女更密集的筛查,或者不接受筛查。与目前基于人口年龄的计划相比,这可能会更好地平衡每个人的筛查利弊。英国国家筛查委员会(UK National Screening Committee,UK NSC)正在考虑使用决策分析和其他模型来评估不同的风险分层筛查策略,并找出剩余的证据差距。本文报告了英国国家筛查委员会研讨会的会议记录,会上该领域的专家讨论了风险预测模型以及决策分析模型,这些模型提供了风险分层筛查计划的效益-危害分析/经济评估(见表 1)。会议的目的是介绍和讨论专家们目前的工作,包括一些在会议召开时尚未公布的数据,为英国国家健康委员会提供参考。研讨会并不打算对未来如何开展筛查进行均衡评估。已确定的进一步工作领域包括:比较模型以评估准确性的方法、最佳风险评估工具、数字筛查基础设施、分层的可接受性、筛查试验的选择以及减少不平等。对整个计划进行风险分层需要谨慎地分阶段进行,并在部署过程中持续评估真实世界的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk stratification in breast screening workshop.

Population screening for breast cancer (BC) is currently offered in the UK for women aged 50 to 71 with the aim of reducing mortality. There is additional screening within the national programme for women identified as having a very high risk of BC. There is growing interest in further risk stratification in breast screening, which would require a whole population risk assessment and the subsequent offer of screening tailored to the individual's risk. Some women would be offered more intensive screening than others or no screening. This might provide a better balance of screening benefits and harms for each individual than the current population age-based programme alone. The UK National Screening Committee (UK NSC) is considering using decision-analytic and other models to evaluate different risk stratification screening strategies and identify remaining gaps in evidence. This paper reports the proceedings of a UK NSC workshop where experts in the field discussed both risk prediction models, as well as decision-analytic models providing a benefit-harm analysis/economic evaluation of risk-stratified screening programmes (see Table 1). The aim of the meeting was to present and discuss the current work of experts, including some data which had not been published at the time of the meeting, to inform the UK NSC. The workshop was not intended to present a balanced evaluation of how to deliver screening in future. Areas for further work identified included methods for comparing models to assess accuracy, the optimum risk assessment tools, the digital screening infrastructure, acceptability of stratification, choice of screening test and reducing inequalities. A move to risk stratification of the whole programme would require a careful phased introduction with continuing assessment of real-world evidence during deployment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Proceedings
BMC Proceedings Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信