Grainne Butler, Camilla Andersen, Jim Buttery, Asheeta Gupta, Melissa M Martyn, Zornitza Stark, Ella Wilkins, Kushani Jayasinghe, Catherine Quinlan
{"title":"可视化基因组解释器的设计与评估:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Grainne Butler, Camilla Andersen, Jim Buttery, Asheeta Gupta, Melissa M Martyn, Zornitza Stark, Ella Wilkins, Kushani Jayasinghe, Catherine Quinlan","doi":"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and assess a visual genomic explainer focusing on plain language and engaging imagery. The explainer aimed to support doctors' comprehension of complex genomic concepts and results and act as a resource promoting the integration of genomic testing into mainstream care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective genomic resource development and questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional and tertiary hospitals in Australia and Ireland, private and community-based clinicians in Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Recruitment of paediatricians and nephrologists in Australia and paediatricians in Ireland was multi-faceted. Emails with survey links were circulated through training bodies, advanced trainee networks, departmental heads, and professional societies.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Comprehension, engagement and perception of the visual explainer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most clinicians surveyed (95% (53) Australian group, 100% (29) Irish group) felt that genomics would be a useful tool in their practice. 77% of Australian paediatric respondents and 73% of Irish paediatric respondents felt that genomics was underutilised. Challenges encountered with genomic testing included poor patient comprehension of the testing process and results along with difficulties perceived by clinicians in explaining complex results. 89% of Australian paediatricians and 100% of Irish paediatricians surveyed would recommend the use of the explainer to other professionals in their field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This genomic resource was acceptable to clinicians and could be a useful tool to support paediatricians integrating genomic testing into mainstream care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8150,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and evaluation of a visual genomic explainer: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Grainne Butler, Camilla Andersen, Jim Buttery, Asheeta Gupta, Melissa M Martyn, Zornitza Stark, Ella Wilkins, Kushani Jayasinghe, Catherine Quinlan\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/archdischild-2024-327650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To design and assess a visual genomic explainer focusing on plain language and engaging imagery. The explainer aimed to support doctors' comprehension of complex genomic concepts and results and act as a resource promoting the integration of genomic testing into mainstream care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective genomic resource development and questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Regional and tertiary hospitals in Australia and Ireland, private and community-based clinicians in Australia.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Recruitment of paediatricians and nephrologists in Australia and paediatricians in Ireland was multi-faceted. Emails with survey links were circulated through training bodies, advanced trainee networks, departmental heads, and professional societies.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Comprehension, engagement and perception of the visual explainer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most clinicians surveyed (95% (53) Australian group, 100% (29) Irish group) felt that genomics would be a useful tool in their practice. 77% of Australian paediatric respondents and 73% of Irish paediatric respondents felt that genomics was underutilised. Challenges encountered with genomic testing included poor patient comprehension of the testing process and results along with difficulties perceived by clinicians in explaining complex results. 89% of Australian paediatricians and 100% of Irish paediatricians surveyed would recommend the use of the explainer to other professionals in their field.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This genomic resource was acceptable to clinicians and could be a useful tool to support paediatricians integrating genomic testing into mainstream care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Disease in Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327650\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Disease in Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2024-327650","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Design and evaluation of a visual genomic explainer: a mixed-methods study.
Objective: To design and assess a visual genomic explainer focusing on plain language and engaging imagery. The explainer aimed to support doctors' comprehension of complex genomic concepts and results and act as a resource promoting the integration of genomic testing into mainstream care.
Design: Prospective genomic resource development and questionnaire.
Setting: Regional and tertiary hospitals in Australia and Ireland, private and community-based clinicians in Australia.
Participants: Recruitment of paediatricians and nephrologists in Australia and paediatricians in Ireland was multi-faceted. Emails with survey links were circulated through training bodies, advanced trainee networks, departmental heads, and professional societies.
Main outcome measures: Comprehension, engagement and perception of the visual explainer.
Results: Most clinicians surveyed (95% (53) Australian group, 100% (29) Irish group) felt that genomics would be a useful tool in their practice. 77% of Australian paediatric respondents and 73% of Irish paediatric respondents felt that genomics was underutilised. Challenges encountered with genomic testing included poor patient comprehension of the testing process and results along with difficulties perceived by clinicians in explaining complex results. 89% of Australian paediatricians and 100% of Irish paediatricians surveyed would recommend the use of the explainer to other professionals in their field.
Conclusion: This genomic resource was acceptable to clinicians and could be a useful tool to support paediatricians integrating genomic testing into mainstream care.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Disease in Childhood is an international peer review journal that aims to keep paediatricians and others up to date with advances in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood diseases as well as advocacy issues such as child protection. It focuses on all aspects of child health and disease from the perinatal period (in the Fetal and Neonatal edition) through to adolescence. ADC includes original research reports, commentaries, reviews of clinical and policy issues, and evidence reports. Areas covered include: community child health, public health, epidemiology, acute paediatrics, advocacy, and ethics.