多中心随机 EVAOLD 试验的原理和设计:评估老年缺血患者的成像指导策略与常规侵入策略。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Gilles Barone-Rochette, Gerald Vanzetto, Nicolas Danchin, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Olivier Hanon, Clemence Charlon, Sandra David-Tchouda, Gaetan Gavazzi, Tabassome Simon, Jean-Luc Bosson
{"title":"多中心随机 EVAOLD 试验的原理和设计:评估老年缺血患者的成像指导策略与常规侵入策略。","authors":"Gilles Barone-Rochette, Gerald Vanzetto, Nicolas Danchin, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Olivier Hanon, Clemence Charlon, Sandra David-Tchouda, Gaetan Gavazzi, Tabassome Simon, Jean-Luc Bosson","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) in elderly patients remains challenging, in particular the benefit/risk balance of routine revascularization remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>EVAOLD is s a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial with 2 parallel arms in NSTEMI patients ≥ 80 years of age. The aim of the trial is to test whether a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging (IMG group) will be non-inferior in preventing Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE, ie all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) rates at 1 year compared with a routine invasive strategy (INV Group). Geriatric assessment and cost- effectiveness analysis will also be performed. A sample size of 1756 patients (assuming a 10% rate of patients lost to follow-up) is needed to show non-inferiority with 80% power. Non-inferiority based on exponential survival curves will be declared if the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio is lower than 1.24, corresponding to a non-inferiority margin of 7% in absolute difference and an event rate of 40% in the INV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVAOLD is a nationwide, prospective, open-label trial testing the non-inferiority of a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly NSTEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov Identifier: NCT03289728.</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rationale and design of the multicentric randomized EVAOLD trial: evaluation of a strategy guided by imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with ischemia.\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Barone-Rochette, Gerald Vanzetto, Nicolas Danchin, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Olivier Hanon, Clemence Charlon, Sandra David-Tchouda, Gaetan Gavazzi, Tabassome Simon, Jean-Luc Bosson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) in elderly patients remains challenging, in particular the benefit/risk balance of routine revascularization remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>EVAOLD is s a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial with 2 parallel arms in NSTEMI patients ≥ 80 years of age. The aim of the trial is to test whether a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging (IMG group) will be non-inferior in preventing Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE, ie all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) rates at 1 year compared with a routine invasive strategy (INV Group). Geriatric assessment and cost- effectiveness analysis will also be performed. A sample size of 1756 patients (assuming a 10% rate of patients lost to follow-up) is needed to show non-inferiority with 80% power. Non-inferiority based on exponential survival curves will be declared if the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio is lower than 1.24, corresponding to a non-inferiority margin of 7% in absolute difference and an event rate of 40% in the INV group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVAOLD is a nationwide, prospective, open-label trial testing the non-inferiority of a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly NSTEMI patients.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov Identifier: NCT03289728.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7868,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American heart journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American heart journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.013\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.10.013","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景老年无 ST 段抬高心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的治疗仍具有挑战性,尤其是常规血管重建的获益/风险平衡仍不确定:EVAOLD是一项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签试验,在年龄≥80岁的NSTEMI患者中开展2个平行臂试验。试验的目的是检验与常规有创治疗策略(INV 组)相比,缺血应激成像指导下的选择性有创治疗策略(IMG 组)在预防重大心脏和脑血管不良事件(MACCE,即全因死亡、非致死性心肌梗死、非致死性卒中)方面的效果是否优于常规有创治疗策略(INV 组)。此外,还将进行老年评估和成本效益分析。需要 1756 例患者的样本量(假设失去随访的患者比例为 10%)才能以 80% 的功率显示非劣效性。如果危险比的单侧 97.5%置信区间的上限低于 1.24,即非劣效性绝对差值为 7%,INV 组的事件发生率为 40%,则将宣布基于指数生存曲线的非劣效性:EVAOLD是一项全国范围内的前瞻性开放标签试验,检验了在缺血应激成像指导下选择性有创治疗策略与常规有创治疗策略在老年NSTEMI患者中的非劣效性:NCT03289728。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Rationale and design of the multicentric randomized EVAOLD trial: evaluation of a strategy guided by imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly patients with ischemia.

Background: The management of myocardial infarction without ST segment elevation (NSTEMI) in elderly patients remains challenging, in particular the benefit/risk balance of routine revascularization remains uncertain.

Study design: EVAOLD is s a multicenter, prospective, open-label trial with 2 parallel arms in NSTEMI patients ≥ 80 years of age. The aim of the trial is to test whether a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging (IMG group) will be non-inferior in preventing Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE, ie all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke) rates at 1 year compared with a routine invasive strategy (INV Group). Geriatric assessment and cost- effectiveness analysis will also be performed. A sample size of 1756 patients (assuming a 10% rate of patients lost to follow-up) is needed to show non-inferiority with 80% power. Non-inferiority based on exponential survival curves will be declared if the upper limit of the one-sided 97.5% confidence interval for the hazard ratio is lower than 1.24, corresponding to a non-inferiority margin of 7% in absolute difference and an event rate of 40% in the INV group.

Conclusion: EVAOLD is a nationwide, prospective, open-label trial testing the non-inferiority of a strategy of selective invasive management guided by ischemia stress imaging versus routine invasive strategy in elderly NSTEMI patients.

Clinicaltrials: gov Identifier: NCT03289728.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信