七氟醚后处理保护蛛网膜下腔出血后的早期神经功能缺损:大鼠随机实验室研究结果。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anesthesia and analgesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1213/ANE.0000000000006829
Laurent Morax, Beatrice Beck-Schimmer, Jonah Neff, Mattia Mueller, Renata Flury-Frei, Martin Schläpfer
{"title":"七氟醚后处理保护蛛网膜下腔出血后的早期神经功能缺损:大鼠随机实验室研究结果。","authors":"Laurent Morax, Beatrice Beck-Schimmer, Jonah Neff, Mattia Mueller, Renata Flury-Frei, Martin Schläpfer","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000006829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with neurocognitive impairment. Recent data suggest that sevoflurane attenuates edema formation after SAH in rats. However, so far, no information is available about the long-term repair phase, nor if sevoflurane impacts functionality by increasing vascularity. This study tested whether sevoflurane postconditioning would improve long-term neurologic deficit through increased formation of new vessels close to the hemorrhage area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three animals were subjected to SAH or sham surgery with or without a 2-hour sevoflurane postconditioning (versus propofol anesthesia). Animal survival, including dropout animals due to death or reaching termination criteria, as well as neurologic deficit, defined by the Garcia score, were assessed 2 hours after recovery until postoperative day 14. On day 14, blood samples and brain tissue were harvested. Vessel density was determined by the number of cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31)-positive vessels, and activated glial cells by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes per field of view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survival rate for sham animals was 100%, 69% in the SAH-propofol and 92% in the SAH-sevoflurane groups. According to the log-rank Mantel-Cox test, survival curves were significantly different ( P = .024). The short-term neurologic deficit was higher in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals 2 hours after recovery and on postoperative day 1 (propofol versus sevoflurane: 14. 6 ± 3.4 vs 15. 9 ± 2.7 points, P = .034, and 16. 2 ± 3.5 vs 17. 8 ± 0.9 points, P = .015). Overall complete recovery from neurologic deficit was observed on day 7 in both SAH groups (18. 0 ± 0.0 vs 18. 0 ± 0.0 points, P = 1.000). Cortical vascular density increased to 80. 6 ± 15.0 vessels per field of view in SAH-propofol animals (vs 71. 4 ± 10.1 in SAH-sevoflurane, P < .001). Activation of glial cells, an indicator of neuroinflammation, was assessed by GFAP-positive astrocytes GFAP per field of view. Hippocampal GFAP-positive cells were 201 ± 68 vs 179 ± 84 cells per field of view in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sevoflurane postconditioning improves survival by 23% (SAH-sevoflurane versus SAH-propofol). The sevoflurane intervention could attenuate the early neurologic deficit, while the long-term outcome was similar across the groups. A higher vascular density close to the SAH area in the propofol group was not associated with improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":"139 5","pages":"1075-1085"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sevoflurane Postconditioning Protects From an Early Neurological Deficit After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Results of a Randomized Laboratory Study in Rats.\",\"authors\":\"Laurent Morax, Beatrice Beck-Schimmer, Jonah Neff, Mattia Mueller, Renata Flury-Frei, Martin Schläpfer\",\"doi\":\"10.1213/ANE.0000000000006829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with neurocognitive impairment. Recent data suggest that sevoflurane attenuates edema formation after SAH in rats. However, so far, no information is available about the long-term repair phase, nor if sevoflurane impacts functionality by increasing vascularity. This study tested whether sevoflurane postconditioning would improve long-term neurologic deficit through increased formation of new vessels close to the hemorrhage area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-three animals were subjected to SAH or sham surgery with or without a 2-hour sevoflurane postconditioning (versus propofol anesthesia). Animal survival, including dropout animals due to death or reaching termination criteria, as well as neurologic deficit, defined by the Garcia score, were assessed 2 hours after recovery until postoperative day 14. On day 14, blood samples and brain tissue were harvested. Vessel density was determined by the number of cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31)-positive vessels, and activated glial cells by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes per field of view.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survival rate for sham animals was 100%, 69% in the SAH-propofol and 92% in the SAH-sevoflurane groups. According to the log-rank Mantel-Cox test, survival curves were significantly different ( P = .024). The short-term neurologic deficit was higher in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals 2 hours after recovery and on postoperative day 1 (propofol versus sevoflurane: 14. 6 ± 3.4 vs 15. 9 ± 2.7 points, P = .034, and 16. 2 ± 3.5 vs 17. 8 ± 0.9 points, P = .015). Overall complete recovery from neurologic deficit was observed on day 7 in both SAH groups (18. 0 ± 0.0 vs 18. 0 ± 0.0 points, P = 1.000). Cortical vascular density increased to 80. 6 ± 15.0 vessels per field of view in SAH-propofol animals (vs 71. 4 ± 10.1 in SAH-sevoflurane, P < .001). Activation of glial cells, an indicator of neuroinflammation, was assessed by GFAP-positive astrocytes GFAP per field of view. Hippocampal GFAP-positive cells were 201 ± 68 vs 179 ± 84 cells per field of view in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals ( P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sevoflurane postconditioning improves survival by 23% (SAH-sevoflurane versus SAH-propofol). The sevoflurane intervention could attenuate the early neurologic deficit, while the long-term outcome was similar across the groups. A higher vascular density close to the SAH area in the propofol group was not associated with improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"volume\":\"139 5\",\"pages\":\"1075-1085\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anesthesia and analgesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006829\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000006829","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)与神经认知障碍有关。最新数据表明,七氟烷可减轻大鼠蛛网膜下腔出血后水肿的形成。然而,到目前为止,还没有关于长期修复阶段的信息,也没有关于七氟烷是否会通过增加血管来影响功能的信息。本研究测试了七氟烷后处理是否会通过增加出血区域附近新血管的形成来改善长期神经功能缺损:方法:53 只动物接受了 SAH 或假手术,并接受或不接受 2 小时的七氟醚后处理(与异丙酚麻醉相比)。动物存活率(包括因死亡或达到终止标准而辍学的动物)以及神经功能缺损(以加西亚评分定义)在恢复后2小时至术后第14天进行评估。术后第 14 天,采集血液样本和脑组织。血管密度根据每视野中分化簇 31(CD31)阳性血管的数量确定,活化胶质细胞根据胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)阳性星形胶质细胞的数量确定:假动物存活率为100%,SAH-丙泊酚组为69%,SAH-七氟醚组为92%。根据对数秩曼特尔-考克斯检验,存活率曲线存在显著差异(P = .024)。恢复后2小时和术后第1天,SAH-丙泊酚组动物的短期神经功能缺损高于SAH-七氟醚组动物(丙泊酚组与七氟醚组:14.9 ± 2.7 分,P = 0.034,以及 16.2 ± 3.5 vs 17.8 ± 0.9 分,P = .015)。两组 SAH 患者在第 7 天均观察到神经功能缺损完全恢复(18.0 ± 0.0 vs 18. 0 ± 0.0 分,P = 1.000)。皮质血管密度增至每视野 80.6 ± 15.0(SAH-丙泊酚组为 71. 4 ± 10.1,P < .001)。神经胶质细胞的活化是神经炎症的一个指标,通过每个视野中 GFAP 阳性的星形胶质细胞 GFAP 进行评估。在SAH-丙泊酚与SAH-七氟醚动物中,海马GFAP阳性细胞为每视野201 ± 68个与179 ± 84个(P < .001):结论:七氟烷后处理可将存活率提高23%(SAH-七氟烷与SAH-丙泊酚相比)。七氟醚干预可减轻早期神经功能缺损,而各组的长期结果相似。丙泊酚组SAH区域附近的血管密度较高,但这与预后的改善无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sevoflurane Postconditioning Protects From an Early Neurological Deficit After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Results of a Randomized Laboratory Study in Rats.

Background: Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is associated with neurocognitive impairment. Recent data suggest that sevoflurane attenuates edema formation after SAH in rats. However, so far, no information is available about the long-term repair phase, nor if sevoflurane impacts functionality by increasing vascularity. This study tested whether sevoflurane postconditioning would improve long-term neurologic deficit through increased formation of new vessels close to the hemorrhage area.

Methods: Fifty-three animals were subjected to SAH or sham surgery with or without a 2-hour sevoflurane postconditioning (versus propofol anesthesia). Animal survival, including dropout animals due to death or reaching termination criteria, as well as neurologic deficit, defined by the Garcia score, were assessed 2 hours after recovery until postoperative day 14. On day 14, blood samples and brain tissue were harvested. Vessel density was determined by the number of cluster of differentiation 31 (CD31)-positive vessels, and activated glial cells by glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP)-positive astrocytes per field of view.

Results: The survival rate for sham animals was 100%, 69% in the SAH-propofol and 92% in the SAH-sevoflurane groups. According to the log-rank Mantel-Cox test, survival curves were significantly different ( P = .024). The short-term neurologic deficit was higher in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals 2 hours after recovery and on postoperative day 1 (propofol versus sevoflurane: 14. 6 ± 3.4 vs 15. 9 ± 2.7 points, P = .034, and 16. 2 ± 3.5 vs 17. 8 ± 0.9 points, P = .015). Overall complete recovery from neurologic deficit was observed on day 7 in both SAH groups (18. 0 ± 0.0 vs 18. 0 ± 0.0 points, P = 1.000). Cortical vascular density increased to 80. 6 ± 15.0 vessels per field of view in SAH-propofol animals (vs 71. 4 ± 10.1 in SAH-sevoflurane, P < .001). Activation of glial cells, an indicator of neuroinflammation, was assessed by GFAP-positive astrocytes GFAP per field of view. Hippocampal GFAP-positive cells were 201 ± 68 vs 179 ± 84 cells per field of view in SAH-propofol versus SAH-sevoflurane animals ( P < .001).

Conclusions: Sevoflurane postconditioning improves survival by 23% (SAH-sevoflurane versus SAH-propofol). The sevoflurane intervention could attenuate the early neurologic deficit, while the long-term outcome was similar across the groups. A higher vascular density close to the SAH area in the propofol group was not associated with improved outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信