Valeria M Li Valverde, Elizabeth Althaus, Lauren Horton, Mauricio F La Rosa, Sina Haeri
{"title":"母胎远程医疗的经济和环境污染影响。","authors":"Valeria M Li Valverde, Elizabeth Althaus, Lauren Horton, Mauricio F La Rosa, Sina Haeri","doi":"10.1055/a-2447-0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> The global issue of greenhouse gas emissions has significant implications for the environment and human health. Telemedicine provides a valuable tool for delivering health care while reducing gas emissions by limiting the need for patient travel. However, the environmental effects of telemedicine in high-risk pregnancy populations remain unassessed. The aim of this study was to estimate the economic and environmental impact of an outpatient teleMFM program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This retrospective cohort study examined all visits at three teleMFM clinics more than 90 miles away from the nearest in-person MFM office between October 1, 2021, and May 1, 2022. Travel distances and times were calculated for each appointment between the patient's home, telemedicine clinic, and nearest in-person clinics, using zip code data and Google Maps web-based map calculator tools. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if in-person using inflation-adjusted Internal Revenue Service annual standard mileage reimbursement rate ($0.58 per mile), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality's average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger vehicles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> During the study period, a total number of 2,712 appointments were scheduled, of which 2,454 were kept (cancellations removed) and analyzed. Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes, and $118.32 saved per patient visit compared with visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over a 7-month period, a total of 96.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates the positive economic and environmental impact of teleMFM utilization in communities remote from in-person care. Given the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to climate change, such findings may provide strategies for our specialty to make informed policy, advocacy, and business decisions.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Telemedicine is a growing and accessible healthcare option; however, current research on this topic primarily focuses on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, overlooking the its environmental impacts.. · Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes and 118.32 dollars saved per patient during their pregnancy compared to visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over the study period a total of 94.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.. · We demonstrate that the widespread deployment of teleMFM programs can not only address the current MFM supply-demand mismatch, but also save families valuable windshield time (travel time and cost) while having a positive impact on the environment..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic and Environmental Pollutant Impact of Maternal-Fetal Telemedicine.\",\"authors\":\"Valeria M Li Valverde, Elizabeth Althaus, Lauren Horton, Mauricio F La Rosa, Sina Haeri\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2447-0069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong> The global issue of greenhouse gas emissions has significant implications for the environment and human health. Telemedicine provides a valuable tool for delivering health care while reducing gas emissions by limiting the need for patient travel. However, the environmental effects of telemedicine in high-risk pregnancy populations remain unassessed. The aim of this study was to estimate the economic and environmental impact of an outpatient teleMFM program.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong> This retrospective cohort study examined all visits at three teleMFM clinics more than 90 miles away from the nearest in-person MFM office between October 1, 2021, and May 1, 2022. Travel distances and times were calculated for each appointment between the patient's home, telemedicine clinic, and nearest in-person clinics, using zip code data and Google Maps web-based map calculator tools. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if in-person using inflation-adjusted Internal Revenue Service annual standard mileage reimbursement rate ($0.58 per mile), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality's average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger vehicles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> During the study period, a total number of 2,712 appointments were scheduled, of which 2,454 were kept (cancellations removed) and analyzed. Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes, and $118.32 saved per patient visit compared with visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over a 7-month period, a total of 96.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This study demonstrates the positive economic and environmental impact of teleMFM utilization in communities remote from in-person care. Given the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to climate change, such findings may provide strategies for our specialty to make informed policy, advocacy, and business decisions.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>· Telemedicine is a growing and accessible healthcare option; however, current research on this topic primarily focuses on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, overlooking the its environmental impacts.. · Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes and 118.32 dollars saved per patient during their pregnancy compared to visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over the study period a total of 94.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.. · We demonstrate that the widespread deployment of teleMFM programs can not only address the current MFM supply-demand mismatch, but also save families valuable windshield time (travel time and cost) while having a positive impact on the environment..</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of perinatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2447-0069\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2447-0069","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic and Environmental Pollutant Impact of Maternal-Fetal Telemedicine.
Objective: The global issue of greenhouse gas emissions has significant implications for the environment and human health. Telemedicine provides a valuable tool for delivering health care while reducing gas emissions by limiting the need for patient travel. However, the environmental effects of telemedicine in high-risk pregnancy populations remain unassessed. The aim of this study was to estimate the economic and environmental impact of an outpatient teleMFM program.
Study design: This retrospective cohort study examined all visits at three teleMFM clinics more than 90 miles away from the nearest in-person MFM office between October 1, 2021, and May 1, 2022. Travel distances and times were calculated for each appointment between the patient's home, telemedicine clinic, and nearest in-person clinics, using zip code data and Google Maps web-based map calculator tools. Travel cost savings and environmental impact were calculated by determining differences in mileage reimbursement rate and emissions between those incurred in attending telemedicine appointments and those that would have been incurred if in-person using inflation-adjusted Internal Revenue Service annual standard mileage reimbursement rate ($0.58 per mile), and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality's average annual emissions and fuel consumption for gasoline-fueled passenger vehicles.
Results: During the study period, a total number of 2,712 appointments were scheduled, of which 2,454 were kept (cancellations removed) and analyzed. Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes, and $118.32 saved per patient visit compared with visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over a 7-month period, a total of 96.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.
Conclusion: This study demonstrates the positive economic and environmental impact of teleMFM utilization in communities remote from in-person care. Given the contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to climate change, such findings may provide strategies for our specialty to make informed policy, advocacy, and business decisions.
Key points: · Telemedicine is a growing and accessible healthcare option; however, current research on this topic primarily focuses on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, overlooking the its environmental impacts.. · Visiting a teleMFM clinic resulted in 204 miles, 200 minutes and 118.32 dollars saved per patient during their pregnancy compared to visiting the nearest in-person clinic. Over the study period a total of 94.6 metric tons of emissions were saved.. · We demonstrate that the widespread deployment of teleMFM programs can not only address the current MFM supply-demand mismatch, but also save families valuable windshield time (travel time and cost) while having a positive impact on the environment..
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields.
The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field.
All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication.
The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.