与淀粉样蛋白和 tau 病理学相关的可改变风险因素与痴呆症进展的关系。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Zsolt Huszár, Alina Solomon, Marie Anne Engh, Vanda Koszovácz, Tamás Terebessy, Zsolt Molnár, Péter Hegyi, András Horváth, Francesca Mangialasche, Miia Kivipelto, Gábor Csukly
{"title":"与淀粉样蛋白和 tau 病理学相关的可改变风险因素与痴呆症进展的关系。","authors":"Zsolt Huszár, Alina Solomon, Marie Anne Engh, Vanda Koszovácz, Tamás Terebessy, Zsolt Molnár, Péter Hegyi, András Horváth, Francesca Mangialasche, Miia Kivipelto, Gábor Csukly","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01602-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia preventive interventions targeting multiple modifiable risk factors are a promising approach. However, the impact of modifiable risk factors in the presence of beta-amyloid or phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) pathology is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of the study was to examine the role of modifiable risk factors (vascular factors, depression, and smoking) in the progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia among 434 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 611 individuals with MCI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Vascular risk factors were summarized with the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) score, dichotomized into higher versus lower risk. Depression and smoking (yes/no) were categorised according to medical history or current symptoms. Analyses were stratified by beta-amyloid negative (A-) and positive (A +), p-tau negative (T-) and positive (T +), or beta-amyloid and p-tau negative (A-T-) and positive (A + T +) biomarker status. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for age, sex, education, baseline MMSE score, baseline hippocampal volume and ApoE4 carrier status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher CAIDE score was associated with increased risk of progression to all-cause dementia in most MCI subgroups: adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% CI] were 3.1 [1.43; 6.53] in the A- subgroup, 1.7 [1.20-2.27] in T + , 2.6 [1.06-6.59] in A-T-, and 1.6 [1.15-2.22] in the A + T + subgroup. Smoking (yes/no) was associated with increased dementia aHR in the A + MCI subgroup: 1.6 [1.07-2.34]. Depression increased dementia aHR in the T + MCI subgroup: 1.5 [1.06-2.02]. No significant associations were found in the CU biomarker subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing modifiable risk factors carries an important potential for reducing the risk of dementia even after the onset of Alzheimer's pathology. Knowledge of biomarker status can further optimize prevention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of modifiable risk factors with progression to dementia in relation to amyloid and tau pathology.\",\"authors\":\"Zsolt Huszár, Alina Solomon, Marie Anne Engh, Vanda Koszovácz, Tamás Terebessy, Zsolt Molnár, Péter Hegyi, András Horváth, Francesca Mangialasche, Miia Kivipelto, Gábor Csukly\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-024-01602-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia preventive interventions targeting multiple modifiable risk factors are a promising approach. However, the impact of modifiable risk factors in the presence of beta-amyloid or phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) pathology is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The objective of the study was to examine the role of modifiable risk factors (vascular factors, depression, and smoking) in the progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia among 434 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 611 individuals with MCI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Vascular risk factors were summarized with the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) score, dichotomized into higher versus lower risk. Depression and smoking (yes/no) were categorised according to medical history or current symptoms. Analyses were stratified by beta-amyloid negative (A-) and positive (A +), p-tau negative (T-) and positive (T +), or beta-amyloid and p-tau negative (A-T-) and positive (A + T +) biomarker status. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for age, sex, education, baseline MMSE score, baseline hippocampal volume and ApoE4 carrier status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher CAIDE score was associated with increased risk of progression to all-cause dementia in most MCI subgroups: adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% CI] were 3.1 [1.43; 6.53] in the A- subgroup, 1.7 [1.20-2.27] in T + , 2.6 [1.06-6.59] in A-T-, and 1.6 [1.15-2.22] in the A + T + subgroup. Smoking (yes/no) was associated with increased dementia aHR in the A + MCI subgroup: 1.6 [1.07-2.34]. Depression increased dementia aHR in the T + MCI subgroup: 1.5 [1.06-2.02]. No significant associations were found in the CU biomarker subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Addressing modifiable risk factors carries an important potential for reducing the risk of dementia even after the onset of Alzheimer's pathology. Knowledge of biomarker status can further optimize prevention strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11515263/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01602-9\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01602-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:针对多种可改变风险因素的痴呆症预防干预是一种很有前景的方法。然而,在存在β-淀粉样蛋白或磷酸化-tau(p-tau)病理的情况下,可改变的风险因素的影响尚不明确:本研究的目的是研究阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)数据库中的434名认知功能未受损者(CU)和611名MCI患者中,可改变的风险因素(血管因素、抑郁和吸烟)在进展为轻度认知障碍(MCI)或痴呆症过程中的作用。血管风险因素通过心血管风险因素、衰老和痴呆(CAIDE)评分进行总结,并分为高风险和低风险。抑郁和吸烟(是/否)根据病史或当前症状进行分类。根据β-淀粉样蛋白阴性(A-)和阳性(A +)、p-tau阴性(T-)和阳性(T +)或β-淀粉样蛋白和p-tau阴性(A-T-)和阳性(A + T +)生物标记物状态进行分层分析。Cox比例危险模型对年龄、性别、教育程度、基线MMSE评分、基线海马体积和载脂蛋白E4携带者状态进行了调整:在大多数MCI亚组中,CAIDE评分越高,发展为全因痴呆的风险越高:A-亚组的调整后危险比(aHR)[95% CI]为3.1[1.43; 6.53],T +为1.7[1.20-2.27],A-T-为2.6[1.06-6.59],A + T +亚组为1.6[1.15-2.22]。在 A + MCI 亚组中,吸烟(是/否)与痴呆 aHR 的增加有关:1.6 [1.07-2.34].抑郁会增加 T + MCI 亚组中痴呆症的 aHR:1.5 [1.06-2.02].在CU生物标记物亚组中没有发现明显的关联:结论:即使在阿尔茨海默病发病后,解决可改变的风险因素也有可能降低痴呆症的风险。了解生物标志物的状态可以进一步优化预防策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of modifiable risk factors with progression to dementia in relation to amyloid and tau pathology.

Background: Dementia preventive interventions targeting multiple modifiable risk factors are a promising approach. However, the impact of modifiable risk factors in the presence of beta-amyloid or phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) pathology is unclear.

Methods: The objective of the study was to examine the role of modifiable risk factors (vascular factors, depression, and smoking) in the progression to mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia among 434 cognitively unimpaired (CU) and 611 individuals with MCI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) database. Vascular risk factors were summarized with the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging, and Dementia (CAIDE) score, dichotomized into higher versus lower risk. Depression and smoking (yes/no) were categorised according to medical history or current symptoms. Analyses were stratified by beta-amyloid negative (A-) and positive (A +), p-tau negative (T-) and positive (T +), or beta-amyloid and p-tau negative (A-T-) and positive (A + T +) biomarker status. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for age, sex, education, baseline MMSE score, baseline hippocampal volume and ApoE4 carrier status.

Results: Higher CAIDE score was associated with increased risk of progression to all-cause dementia in most MCI subgroups: adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) [95% CI] were 3.1 [1.43; 6.53] in the A- subgroup, 1.7 [1.20-2.27] in T + , 2.6 [1.06-6.59] in A-T-, and 1.6 [1.15-2.22] in the A + T + subgroup. Smoking (yes/no) was associated with increased dementia aHR in the A + MCI subgroup: 1.6 [1.07-2.34]. Depression increased dementia aHR in the T + MCI subgroup: 1.5 [1.06-2.02]. No significant associations were found in the CU biomarker subgroups.

Conclusion: Addressing modifiable risk factors carries an important potential for reducing the risk of dementia even after the onset of Alzheimer's pathology. Knowledge of biomarker status can further optimize prevention strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信