大不列颠及爱尔兰上消化道外科协会(AUGIS)/围手术期质量倡议(POQI)关于食道胃手术术前康复的共识声明。

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Robert C Walker, Sowrav Barman, Philip H Pucher, Pritam Singh, Greg Whyte, John Moore, Fiona Huddy, Orla Evans, Gemma Tham, Zainab Noor Z, Juliette Hussey, Malcolm A West, Sandy Jack, Denny Levett, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage, Javed Sultan, Nicholas Maynard, Timothy E Miller, Michael P W Grocott, Andrew R Davies
{"title":"大不列颠及爱尔兰上消化道外科协会(AUGIS)/围手术期质量倡议(POQI)关于食道胃手术术前康复的共识声明。","authors":"Robert C Walker, Sowrav Barman, Philip H Pucher, Pritam Singh, Greg Whyte, John Moore, Fiona Huddy, Orla Evans, Gemma Tham, Zainab Noor Z, Juliette Hussey, Malcolm A West, Sandy Jack, Denny Levett, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage, Javed Sultan, Nicholas Maynard, Timothy E Miller, Michael P W Grocott, Andrew R Davies","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation is safe, feasible and may improve a range of outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC). Recent studies have suggested the potential of prehabilitation to improve body composition, sarcopenia and physical fitness, reduce surgical complications and improve quality of life. Despite this, prehabilitation services are not offered throughout all OGC centres in the UK. Where prehabilitation is offered, delivery and definitions vary significantly, as do funding sources and access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A professional association endorsed series of consensus meetings were conducted using a modified Delphi process developed by the Peri-Operative Quality Initiative (POQI) to identify and refine consensus statements relating to the development and delivery of prehabilitation services for OGC patients. Participants from a variety of disciplines were identified based on a track record of published studies in the field of prehabilitation and/or practice experience encompassing prehabilitation of OGC patients. Approval from the POQI board was obtained and independent supervision provided by POQI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 statements were developed and agreed by 26 participants over a preliminary meeting and 2 semi-structured formal POQI meetings. Ten research themes were identified. In the case of one statement, consensus was not reached and the statement was recorded and developed into a research theme. A strong recommendation was made for the majority of the consensus statements (17 of 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus statements encompassing the interventions and outcomes of prehabilitation services in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery have been developed to inform the implementation of programmes.</p>","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":"111 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)/perioperative quality initiative (POQI) consensus statement on prehabilitation in oesophagogastric surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Robert C Walker, Sowrav Barman, Philip H Pucher, Pritam Singh, Greg Whyte, John Moore, Fiona Huddy, Orla Evans, Gemma Tham, Zainab Noor Z, Juliette Hussey, Malcolm A West, Sandy Jack, Denny Levett, Timothy J Underwood, James A Gossage, Javed Sultan, Nicholas Maynard, Timothy E Miller, Michael P W Grocott, Andrew R Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znae223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation is safe, feasible and may improve a range of outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC). Recent studies have suggested the potential of prehabilitation to improve body composition, sarcopenia and physical fitness, reduce surgical complications and improve quality of life. Despite this, prehabilitation services are not offered throughout all OGC centres in the UK. Where prehabilitation is offered, delivery and definitions vary significantly, as do funding sources and access.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A professional association endorsed series of consensus meetings were conducted using a modified Delphi process developed by the Peri-Operative Quality Initiative (POQI) to identify and refine consensus statements relating to the development and delivery of prehabilitation services for OGC patients. Participants from a variety of disciplines were identified based on a track record of published studies in the field of prehabilitation and/or practice experience encompassing prehabilitation of OGC patients. Approval from the POQI board was obtained and independent supervision provided by POQI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 statements were developed and agreed by 26 participants over a preliminary meeting and 2 semi-structured formal POQI meetings. Ten research themes were identified. In the case of one statement, consensus was not reached and the statement was recorded and developed into a research theme. A strong recommendation was made for the majority of the consensus statements (17 of 20).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consensus statements encompassing the interventions and outcomes of prehabilitation services in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery have been developed to inform the implementation of programmes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"111 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae223\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae223","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:康复训练安全、可行,可改善食管胃癌(OGC)患者的一系列预后。最近的研究表明,康复训练有可能改善身体成分、肌肉疏松症和体能,减少手术并发症并提高生活质量。尽管如此,英国并非所有 OGC 中心都提供康复训练服务。在提供预康复服务的地方,服务的提供和定义有很大差异,资金来源和获取途径也不尽相同:方法:采用由围手术期质量倡议(POQI)开发的改良德尔菲流程,召开了一系列由专业协会认可的共识会议,以确定和完善与 OGC 患者康复前服务的发展和提供相关的共识声明。参与者来自不同的学科,他们在康复治疗领域发表过研究论文,并且/或者具有对 OGC 患者进行康复治疗的实践经验。调查获得了 POQI 董事会的批准,并由 POQI 提供独立监督:在一次预备会议和两次半结构化的 POQI 正式会议上,26 位与会者共制定并商定了 20 项声明。确定了 10 个研究主题。有一项陈述未能达成一致意见,该陈述被记录下来并发展成为一个研究主题。大多数共识声明(20 项中的 17 项)都提出了强烈建议:讨论:食道胃癌手术术前康复服务的干预措施和结果已形成共识声明,为计划的实施提供了参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)/perioperative quality initiative (POQI) consensus statement on prehabilitation in oesophagogastric surgery.

Background: Prehabilitation is safe, feasible and may improve a range of outcomes in patients with oesophago-gastric cancer (OGC). Recent studies have suggested the potential of prehabilitation to improve body composition, sarcopenia and physical fitness, reduce surgical complications and improve quality of life. Despite this, prehabilitation services are not offered throughout all OGC centres in the UK. Where prehabilitation is offered, delivery and definitions vary significantly, as do funding sources and access.

Methods: A professional association endorsed series of consensus meetings were conducted using a modified Delphi process developed by the Peri-Operative Quality Initiative (POQI) to identify and refine consensus statements relating to the development and delivery of prehabilitation services for OGC patients. Participants from a variety of disciplines were identified based on a track record of published studies in the field of prehabilitation and/or practice experience encompassing prehabilitation of OGC patients. Approval from the POQI board was obtained and independent supervision provided by POQI.

Results: A total of 20 statements were developed and agreed by 26 participants over a preliminary meeting and 2 semi-structured formal POQI meetings. Ten research themes were identified. In the case of one statement, consensus was not reached and the statement was recorded and developed into a research theme. A strong recommendation was made for the majority of the consensus statements (17 of 20).

Discussion: Consensus statements encompassing the interventions and outcomes of prehabilitation services in oesophago-gastric cancer surgery have been developed to inform the implementation of programmes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信