Graham A. Stewart, Sean J. Sharp, Aileen K. Taylor, Michael R. Williams, Margaret A. Palmer
{"title":"湿地甲烷通量的高度空间变化与植被斑块类型有关","authors":"Graham A. Stewart, Sean J. Sharp, Aileen K. Taylor, Michael R. Williams, Margaret A. Palmer","doi":"10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), but spatial variability in fluxes complicates prediction, budgeting, and mitigation efforts. Despite the many environmental factors identified as CH<sub>4</sub> drivers, the overall influence of wetland spatial heterogeneity on CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes remains unclear. We identified five dominant patch types—submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV), emergent forbs, sedges/rushes, grasses, and open water—within a freshwater wetland in Maryland, USA, and measured CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes using a combined chamber and eddy covariance approach from June to September 2021. Because patch types integrate co-occurring environmental factors, we hypothesized that CH<sub>4</sub> flux is best characterized at the patch scale. Chamber measurements from representative patches showed distinct CH<sub>4</sub> signals; fluxes from grasses and sedges/rushes were highest, while fluxes from SAV and forbs were lower but skewed, suggesting episodic emission pulses. Open water had the lowest fluxes. Differences between patches were consistent over time, and spatial variability was greater between patches than within them, highlighting patches as key drivers of flux variability. By combining chamber fluxes with eddy covariance data in a Bayesian framework, we provide evidence that patch-type fluxes scale over space and time. Understanding spatial heterogeneity is essential for quantifying wetland contributions to global biogeochemical cycles and predicting the impacts of environmental change on wetland ecosystem processes. Our study demonstrates the importance of vegetation patch types in structuring spatial variability and supports a patch-explicit representation to reduce uncertainty in wetland CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"167 12","pages":"1589 - 1607"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High spatial variability in wetland methane fluxes is tied to vegetation patch types\",\"authors\":\"Graham A. Stewart, Sean J. Sharp, Aileen K. Taylor, Michael R. Williams, Margaret A. Palmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH<sub>4</sub>), but spatial variability in fluxes complicates prediction, budgeting, and mitigation efforts. Despite the many environmental factors identified as CH<sub>4</sub> drivers, the overall influence of wetland spatial heterogeneity on CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes remains unclear. We identified five dominant patch types—submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV), emergent forbs, sedges/rushes, grasses, and open water—within a freshwater wetland in Maryland, USA, and measured CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes using a combined chamber and eddy covariance approach from June to September 2021. Because patch types integrate co-occurring environmental factors, we hypothesized that CH<sub>4</sub> flux is best characterized at the patch scale. Chamber measurements from representative patches showed distinct CH<sub>4</sub> signals; fluxes from grasses and sedges/rushes were highest, while fluxes from SAV and forbs were lower but skewed, suggesting episodic emission pulses. Open water had the lowest fluxes. Differences between patches were consistent over time, and spatial variability was greater between patches than within them, highlighting patches as key drivers of flux variability. By combining chamber fluxes with eddy covariance data in a Bayesian framework, we provide evidence that patch-type fluxes scale over space and time. Understanding spatial heterogeneity is essential for quantifying wetland contributions to global biogeochemical cycles and predicting the impacts of environmental change on wetland ecosystem processes. Our study demonstrates the importance of vegetation patch types in structuring spatial variability and supports a patch-explicit representation to reduce uncertainty in wetland CH<sub>4</sub> fluxes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"volume\":\"167 12\",\"pages\":\"1589 - 1607\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10533-024-01188-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
High spatial variability in wetland methane fluxes is tied to vegetation patch types
Wetlands are the largest natural source of methane (CH4), but spatial variability in fluxes complicates prediction, budgeting, and mitigation efforts. Despite the many environmental factors identified as CH4 drivers, the overall influence of wetland spatial heterogeneity on CH4 fluxes remains unclear. We identified five dominant patch types—submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV), emergent forbs, sedges/rushes, grasses, and open water—within a freshwater wetland in Maryland, USA, and measured CH4 fluxes using a combined chamber and eddy covariance approach from June to September 2021. Because patch types integrate co-occurring environmental factors, we hypothesized that CH4 flux is best characterized at the patch scale. Chamber measurements from representative patches showed distinct CH4 signals; fluxes from grasses and sedges/rushes were highest, while fluxes from SAV and forbs were lower but skewed, suggesting episodic emission pulses. Open water had the lowest fluxes. Differences between patches were consistent over time, and spatial variability was greater between patches than within them, highlighting patches as key drivers of flux variability. By combining chamber fluxes with eddy covariance data in a Bayesian framework, we provide evidence that patch-type fluxes scale over space and time. Understanding spatial heterogeneity is essential for quantifying wetland contributions to global biogeochemical cycles and predicting the impacts of environmental change on wetland ecosystem processes. Our study demonstrates the importance of vegetation patch types in structuring spatial variability and supports a patch-explicit representation to reduce uncertainty in wetland CH4 fluxes.
期刊介绍:
Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.