森林类型控制着枯落物和根系对土壤持久性有机碳的贡献

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Dasheng Sun, Xueli Qiu, Jiayin Feng, Jingyi Ru, Jian Song, Shiqiang Wan
{"title":"森林类型控制着枯落物和根系对土壤持久性有机碳的贡献","authors":"Dasheng Sun, Xueli Qiu, Jiayin Feng, Jingyi Ru, Jian Song, Shiqiang Wan","doi":"10.1007/s10533-024-01185-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Forest ecosystems contain a substantial terrestrial reservoir of soil organic carbon (SOC). Here, a “Detritus Input and Removal Treatments” experiment was conducted to explore the effects of litter and roots on soil labile, persistent, and total organic C (TOC) pools in the coniferous, broad-leaved, and coniferous-broad-leaved mixed forests (CF, BF, and CBF, respectively) in the subtropical and warm temperate transition zone in Henan province, eastern China. After 2–3 years of detritus manipulations, neither litter addition nor root exclusion affected soil temperature or moisture. In contrast, litter removal increased soil temperature but decreased soil moisture, regardless of forest types. Litter addition marginally decreased labile OC and TOC contents in the BF but not in the CF and CBF. Litter removal reduced labile OC and TOC contents in the CF and BF and persistent OC contents in the CF only. Root exclusion decreased labile OC contents in the CBF only, but reduced persistent OC and TOC contents in the CF and CBF. Structural equation models suggested that litter but not root manipulation altered SOC pools via changing soil temperature and moisture in the BF, whereas the effects of litter and root manipulation on SOC pools were not related to the changes in soil temperature and moisture in the CF and CBF. Our results suggest that the impact of litter and roots on SOC pools depends on forest types, which may indicate differential responses of SOC storage among forests under global change scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":8901,"journal":{"name":"Biogeochemistry","volume":"94 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forest types control the contribution of litter and roots to labile and persistent soil organic carbon\",\"authors\":\"Dasheng Sun, Xueli Qiu, Jiayin Feng, Jingyi Ru, Jian Song, Shiqiang Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10533-024-01185-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Forest ecosystems contain a substantial terrestrial reservoir of soil organic carbon (SOC). Here, a “Detritus Input and Removal Treatments” experiment was conducted to explore the effects of litter and roots on soil labile, persistent, and total organic C (TOC) pools in the coniferous, broad-leaved, and coniferous-broad-leaved mixed forests (CF, BF, and CBF, respectively) in the subtropical and warm temperate transition zone in Henan province, eastern China. After 2–3 years of detritus manipulations, neither litter addition nor root exclusion affected soil temperature or moisture. In contrast, litter removal increased soil temperature but decreased soil moisture, regardless of forest types. Litter addition marginally decreased labile OC and TOC contents in the BF but not in the CF and CBF. Litter removal reduced labile OC and TOC contents in the CF and BF and persistent OC contents in the CF only. Root exclusion decreased labile OC contents in the CBF only, but reduced persistent OC and TOC contents in the CF and CBF. Structural equation models suggested that litter but not root manipulation altered SOC pools via changing soil temperature and moisture in the BF, whereas the effects of litter and root manipulation on SOC pools were not related to the changes in soil temperature and moisture in the CF and CBF. Our results suggest that the impact of litter and roots on SOC pools depends on forest types, which may indicate differential responses of SOC storage among forests under global change scenarios.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biogeochemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01185-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biogeochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-024-01185-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

森林生态系统包含大量的陆地土壤有机碳库(SOC)。在此,我们进行了一项 "残积物输入和去除处理 "实验,以探讨在中国东部河南省亚热带与暖温带过渡带的针叶林、阔叶林和针阔叶混交林(分别为CF、BF和CBF)中,残积物和根系对土壤中可移动有机碳库、持久性有机碳库和总有机碳库的影响。经过2-3年的残积物处理后,枯落物添加和根系排除都不会影响土壤温度和湿度。相反,无论森林类型如何,清除垃圾都会提高土壤温度,但降低土壤湿度。丢弃物的添加略微降低了BF中的可变OC和TOC含量,但没有降低CF和CBF中的可变OC和TOC含量。清除枯落物降低了 CF 和 BF 中的可变 OC 和 TOC 含量,仅降低了 CF 中的持久 OC 含量。根系排除只降低了 CBF 中的可变 OC 含量,但降低了 CF 和 CBF 中的持久 OC 和 TOC 含量。结构方程模型表明,丢弃物而非根系操作会通过改变BF的土壤温度和湿度来改变SOC库,而丢弃物和根系操作对SOC库的影响与CF和CBF土壤温度和湿度的变化无关。我们的研究结果表明,枯落物和根系对SOC池的影响取决于森林类型,这可能表明在全球变化情景下,不同森林对SOC储存的反应是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Forest types control the contribution of litter and roots to labile and persistent soil organic carbon

Forest types control the contribution of litter and roots to labile and persistent soil organic carbon

Forest ecosystems contain a substantial terrestrial reservoir of soil organic carbon (SOC). Here, a “Detritus Input and Removal Treatments” experiment was conducted to explore the effects of litter and roots on soil labile, persistent, and total organic C (TOC) pools in the coniferous, broad-leaved, and coniferous-broad-leaved mixed forests (CF, BF, and CBF, respectively) in the subtropical and warm temperate transition zone in Henan province, eastern China. After 2–3 years of detritus manipulations, neither litter addition nor root exclusion affected soil temperature or moisture. In contrast, litter removal increased soil temperature but decreased soil moisture, regardless of forest types. Litter addition marginally decreased labile OC and TOC contents in the BF but not in the CF and CBF. Litter removal reduced labile OC and TOC contents in the CF and BF and persistent OC contents in the CF only. Root exclusion decreased labile OC contents in the CBF only, but reduced persistent OC and TOC contents in the CF and CBF. Structural equation models suggested that litter but not root manipulation altered SOC pools via changing soil temperature and moisture in the BF, whereas the effects of litter and root manipulation on SOC pools were not related to the changes in soil temperature and moisture in the CF and CBF. Our results suggest that the impact of litter and roots on SOC pools depends on forest types, which may indicate differential responses of SOC storage among forests under global change scenarios.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biogeochemistry
Biogeochemistry 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
3.2 months
期刊介绍: Biogeochemistry publishes original and synthetic papers dealing with biotic controls on the chemistry of the environment, or with the geochemical control of the structure and function of ecosystems. Cycles are considered, either of individual elements or of specific classes of natural or anthropogenic compounds in ecosystems. Particular emphasis is given to coupled interactions of element cycles. The journal spans from the molecular to global scales to elucidate the mechanisms driving patterns in biogeochemical cycles through space and time. Studies on both natural and artificial ecosystems are published when they contribute to a general understanding of biogeochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信