Ha Yun Oh, Tae Kun Kim, Yun Sun Choi, Mira Park, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Jin Kyung An
{"title":"在临床实践中使用卷积神经网络对脊柱侧凸进行放射学分析","authors":"Ha Yun Oh, Tae Kun Kim, Yun Sun Choi, Mira Park, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Jin Kyung An","doi":"10.3348/jksr.2023.0111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reliability and accuracy of an automated Cobb angle measurement (ACAM) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for scoliosis evaluation and to compare measurement times.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ACAM was applied to spine radiographs in 411 patients suspected of scoliosis. Observer 1 (consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists) and observer 2 (a radiology resident) measured Cobb angle (CA). CA measurements were categorized using observer 1's measurements as the reference standard. Inter-observer reliability and correlation were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, respectively. Accuracy and measurement time of ACAM and observers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACAM demonstrated excellent reliability and very high correlation with observer 1 (ICC = 0.976, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.948), with a mean CA difference of 1.1. Overall accuracy was high (88.2%), particularly in mild (92.2%) and moderate (96%) scoliosis. Accuracy was lower in spinal asymmetry (77.1%) and higher in severe scoliosis (95%), although the CA was lower compared to the observers. ACAM significantly reduced measurement time by nearly half compared to the observers (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACAM using CNN enhances CA measurement for assessing mild or moderate scoliosis, despite limitations in spinal asymmetry or severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, it substantially decreases measurement time.</p>","PeriodicalId":101329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","volume":"85 5","pages":"926-936"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Radiographic Analysis of Scoliosis Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Practice.\",\"authors\":\"Ha Yun Oh, Tae Kun Kim, Yun Sun Choi, Mira Park, Ra Gyoung Yoon, Jin Kyung An\",\"doi\":\"10.3348/jksr.2023.0111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the reliability and accuracy of an automated Cobb angle measurement (ACAM) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for scoliosis evaluation and to compare measurement times.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>ACAM was applied to spine radiographs in 411 patients suspected of scoliosis. Observer 1 (consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists) and observer 2 (a radiology resident) measured Cobb angle (CA). CA measurements were categorized using observer 1's measurements as the reference standard. Inter-observer reliability and correlation were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, respectively. Accuracy and measurement time of ACAM and observers were evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ACAM demonstrated excellent reliability and very high correlation with observer 1 (ICC = 0.976, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.948), with a mean CA difference of 1.1. Overall accuracy was high (88.2%), particularly in mild (92.2%) and moderate (96%) scoliosis. Accuracy was lower in spinal asymmetry (77.1%) and higher in severe scoliosis (95%), although the CA was lower compared to the observers. ACAM significantly reduced measurement time by nearly half compared to the observers (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ACAM using CNN enhances CA measurement for assessing mild or moderate scoliosis, despite limitations in spinal asymmetry or severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, it substantially decreases measurement time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"volume\":\"85 5\",\"pages\":\"926-936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11473978/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2023.0111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估使用卷积神经网络(CNN)进行脊柱侧弯评估的自动Cobb角测量(ACAM)的可靠性和准确性,并比较测量时间:将 ACAM 应用于 411 名脊柱侧弯疑似患者的脊柱 X 光片。观察者 1(两名肌肉骨骼放射科医师的共识)和观察者 2(一名放射科住院医师)测量了 Cobb 角 (CA)。以观察者 1 的测量结果为参考标准,对 CA 测量结果进行分类。观察者之间的可靠性和相关性分别使用类内相关系数(ICC)和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数进行评估。对 ACAM 和观察者的准确性和测量时间进行了评估:ACAM 的可靠性极佳,与观察者 1 的相关性极高(ICC = 0.976,Spearman秩相关系数 = 0.948),平均 CA 差值为 1.1。总体准确率很高(88.2%),尤其是轻度(92.2%)和中度(96%)脊柱侧弯。脊柱不对称的准确率较低(77.1%),而重度脊柱侧凸的准确率较高(95%),但与观察者相比,CA 值较低。与观察者相比,ACAM 大大减少了近一半的测量时间(p < 0.001):结论:使用 CNN 的 ACAM 增强了评估轻度或中度脊柱侧凸的 CA 测量,尽管在脊柱不对称或严重脊柱侧凸方面存在局限性。结论:使用 CNN 的 ACAM 在评估轻度或中度脊柱侧弯时可增强 CA 测量效果,但在脊柱不对称或重度脊柱侧弯方面存在局限性,而且还能大幅缩短测量时间。
Radiographic Analysis of Scoliosis Using Convolutional Neural Network in Clinical Practice.
Purpose: To assess the reliability and accuracy of an automated Cobb angle measurement (ACAM) using a convolutional neural network (CNN) for scoliosis evaluation and to compare measurement times.
Materials and methods: ACAM was applied to spine radiographs in 411 patients suspected of scoliosis. Observer 1 (consensus of two musculoskeletal radiologists) and observer 2 (a radiology resident) measured Cobb angle (CA). CA measurements were categorized using observer 1's measurements as the reference standard. Inter-observer reliability and correlation were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Spearman's rank correlation coefficient, respectively. Accuracy and measurement time of ACAM and observers were evaluated.
Results: ACAM demonstrated excellent reliability and very high correlation with observer 1 (ICC = 0.976, Spearman's rank correlation = 0.948), with a mean CA difference of 1.1. Overall accuracy was high (88.2%), particularly in mild (92.2%) and moderate (96%) scoliosis. Accuracy was lower in spinal asymmetry (77.1%) and higher in severe scoliosis (95%), although the CA was lower compared to the observers. ACAM significantly reduced measurement time by nearly half compared to the observers (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: ACAM using CNN enhances CA measurement for assessing mild or moderate scoliosis, despite limitations in spinal asymmetry or severe scoliosis. Nonetheless, it substantially decreases measurement time.