{"title":"眼动脱敏和再处理疗法作为儿童拔牙期间疼痛治疗的辅助手段--随机对照试验。","authors":"Apoorva Rathore, Namita Kalra, Rishi Tyagi, Amit Khatri, Shruti Srivastava, Deepak Khandelwal","doi":"10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.5.329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental treatment is challenging for children experiencing pain and anxiety. Effective administration of local anesthesia (LA) is crucial for most pediatric dentistry treatments. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy has emerged primarily to manage post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a wide variety of anxiety- and pain-related conditions. However, the use of this therapy to manage pain in pediatric dentistry has not yet been reported. This study aimed to assess the trends in pain in pediatric dental patients with and without EMDR therapy during LA and extraction. The need for analgesic consumption within 24 h post extraction and the overall dental experience were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children aged 8-12 years participated in a randomized controlled clinical trial with the goal of extracting the primary mandibular first or second molar on the right or left side and were stratified into: group I: EMDR therapy; group II: Tender Love and Care. Pain was measured at three different time intervals. An unpaired t-test was performed for intergroup comparison of continuous data, and the repeated measures ANOVA was applied for intergroup comparison between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain was significantly lower in group I (pain after topical LA gel application, P = 0.229; pain after LA administration, P = 0.036; pain after extraction, P < 0.001). The need for analgesic consumption was lower in this group (P = 0.072), and the overall dental experience was rated better (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research has shown that EMDR therapy effectively reduces pain in children, making it a recommended practice for pediatric dentists trained in this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"24 5","pages":"329-340"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471346/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy as an adjunct to pain management during dental extraction in children - a randomized control trial.\",\"authors\":\"Apoorva Rathore, Namita Kalra, Rishi Tyagi, Amit Khatri, Shruti Srivastava, Deepak Khandelwal\",\"doi\":\"10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.5.329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dental treatment is challenging for children experiencing pain and anxiety. Effective administration of local anesthesia (LA) is crucial for most pediatric dentistry treatments. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy has emerged primarily to manage post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a wide variety of anxiety- and pain-related conditions. However, the use of this therapy to manage pain in pediatric dentistry has not yet been reported. This study aimed to assess the trends in pain in pediatric dental patients with and without EMDR therapy during LA and extraction. The need for analgesic consumption within 24 h post extraction and the overall dental experience were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty children aged 8-12 years participated in a randomized controlled clinical trial with the goal of extracting the primary mandibular first or second molar on the right or left side and were stratified into: group I: EMDR therapy; group II: Tender Love and Care. Pain was measured at three different time intervals. An unpaired t-test was performed for intergroup comparison of continuous data, and the repeated measures ANOVA was applied for intergroup comparison between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain was significantly lower in group I (pain after topical LA gel application, P = 0.229; pain after LA administration, P = 0.036; pain after extraction, P < 0.001). The need for analgesic consumption was lower in this group (P = 0.072), and the overall dental experience was rated better (P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research has shown that EMDR therapy effectively reduces pain in children, making it a recommended practice for pediatric dentists trained in this technique.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"volume\":\"24 5\",\"pages\":\"329-340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11471346/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.5.329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2024.24.5.329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:对于疼痛和焦虑的儿童来说,牙科治疗具有挑战性。有效实施局部麻醉(LA)对大多数儿童牙科治疗至关重要。眼动脱敏和再处理疗法(EMDR)主要用于治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)以及各种焦虑和疼痛相关疾病。然而,在儿童牙科中使用这种疗法来控制疼痛的情况尚未见报道。本研究旨在评估接受和未接受EMDR治疗的儿童牙科患者在LA和拔牙期间的疼痛趋势。此外,还评估了拔牙后 24 小时内的镇痛剂用量需求以及总体牙科治疗体验:60名8-12岁的儿童参加了一项随机对照临床试验,目的是拔除右侧或左侧下颌第一或第二磨牙,并被分为以下两组:第一组:EMDR疗法;第二组:温柔的爱与关怀。在三个不同的时间间隔测量疼痛。连续数据的组间比较采用非配对 t 检验,组间比较采用重复测量方差分析:结果:I 组疼痛明显减轻(局部使用 LA 凝胶后疼痛,P = 0.229;使用 LA 后疼痛,P = 0.036;拔牙后疼痛,P < 0.001)。该组的镇痛剂用量更少(P = 0.072),总体牙科体验更好(P < 0.0001):研究表明,EMDR疗法能有效减轻儿童疼痛,因此建议接受过该技术培训的儿童牙医采用该疗法。
Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy as an adjunct to pain management during dental extraction in children - a randomized control trial.
Background: Dental treatment is challenging for children experiencing pain and anxiety. Effective administration of local anesthesia (LA) is crucial for most pediatric dentistry treatments. Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) therapy has emerged primarily to manage post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and a wide variety of anxiety- and pain-related conditions. However, the use of this therapy to manage pain in pediatric dentistry has not yet been reported. This study aimed to assess the trends in pain in pediatric dental patients with and without EMDR therapy during LA and extraction. The need for analgesic consumption within 24 h post extraction and the overall dental experience were also evaluated.
Methods: Sixty children aged 8-12 years participated in a randomized controlled clinical trial with the goal of extracting the primary mandibular first or second molar on the right or left side and were stratified into: group I: EMDR therapy; group II: Tender Love and Care. Pain was measured at three different time intervals. An unpaired t-test was performed for intergroup comparison of continuous data, and the repeated measures ANOVA was applied for intergroup comparison between the groups.
Results: Pain was significantly lower in group I (pain after topical LA gel application, P = 0.229; pain after LA administration, P = 0.036; pain after extraction, P < 0.001). The need for analgesic consumption was lower in this group (P = 0.072), and the overall dental experience was rated better (P < 0.0001).
Conclusion: Research has shown that EMDR therapy effectively reduces pain in children, making it a recommended practice for pediatric dentists trained in this technique.