{"title":"静脉注射皮质类固醇脉冲疗法治疗快速进展性斑秃的长期疗效:对 106 个病例进行的单中心回顾性分析,以及对原本用于预测半年疗效的评分系统进行的长期实用性评估。","authors":"Masahiro Fukuyama, Misaki Kinoshita-Ise, Manabu Ohyama","doi":"10.1111/1346-8138.17506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy (IVPT) has been preferentially conducted for rapidly progressive alopecia areata (RP-AA); however, the evaluation of long-term outcomes has been insufficient. In this study, 106 IVPT-treated RP-AA patients (36 males and 70 females) who were followed up for more than 1 year and up to 6.8 years were retrospectively analyzed. The mean observation period was 1137.8 ± 587.9 days (range 380–2490). The mean severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score before IVPT was 21.3 ± 23.4 but whole-scalp hair loss was observed in all cases after the intervention, suggesting that IVPT was performed soon after the onset. With additional interventions represented by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection with or without topical potent corticosteroid for those who insufficiently responded at 6 months after IVPT, 64.2%, 14.2%, and 21.7% of the patients respectively achieved good response (GR; SALT score ≤25), moderate response (MR; 25 < SALT score <75), and poor response (PR; 75 ≤ SALT score) 1 year after IVPT. On the final evaluation, the proportions of patients with GR, MR, and PR were 79 (74.5%), 7 (6.6%), and 20 (18.9%). Sixteen patients achieved and maintained full hair regrowth with IVPT alone until the end of observation. A previously reported scoring system for the short-term outcome prediction was shown to be useful for distinguishing the final-point GR responders from PR responders (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Of note, 21 patients were found to have some symptoms suggestive of the existence of preceding infectious diseases and tended to relapse. The revised scoring system adding the absence of preceding infectious diseases as one factor successfully predicted the occurrence of the relapse in our cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Taken together, previously unreported real-world efficacy of IVPT to RP-AA was elucidated with the invention of a tool putatively enabling optimal long-term management.</p>","PeriodicalId":54848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dermatology","volume":"52 1","pages":"112-121"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term outcomes of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy for rapidly progressive alopecia areata: A single-center retrospective analysis of 106 cases and usefulness evaluation of a scoring system originally designed for half-year efficacy prediction for extended periods\",\"authors\":\"Masahiro Fukuyama, Misaki Kinoshita-Ise, Manabu Ohyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1346-8138.17506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy (IVPT) has been preferentially conducted for rapidly progressive alopecia areata (RP-AA); however, the evaluation of long-term outcomes has been insufficient. In this study, 106 IVPT-treated RP-AA patients (36 males and 70 females) who were followed up for more than 1 year and up to 6.8 years were retrospectively analyzed. The mean observation period was 1137.8 ± 587.9 days (range 380–2490). The mean severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score before IVPT was 21.3 ± 23.4 but whole-scalp hair loss was observed in all cases after the intervention, suggesting that IVPT was performed soon after the onset. With additional interventions represented by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection with or without topical potent corticosteroid for those who insufficiently responded at 6 months after IVPT, 64.2%, 14.2%, and 21.7% of the patients respectively achieved good response (GR; SALT score ≤25), moderate response (MR; 25 < SALT score <75), and poor response (PR; 75 ≤ SALT score) 1 year after IVPT. On the final evaluation, the proportions of patients with GR, MR, and PR were 79 (74.5%), 7 (6.6%), and 20 (18.9%). Sixteen patients achieved and maintained full hair regrowth with IVPT alone until the end of observation. A previously reported scoring system for the short-term outcome prediction was shown to be useful for distinguishing the final-point GR responders from PR responders (<i>P</i> = 0.003). Of note, 21 patients were found to have some symptoms suggestive of the existence of preceding infectious diseases and tended to relapse. The revised scoring system adding the absence of preceding infectious diseases as one factor successfully predicted the occurrence of the relapse in our cohort (<i>P</i> = 0.002). Taken together, previously unreported real-world efficacy of IVPT to RP-AA was elucidated with the invention of a tool putatively enabling optimal long-term management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dermatology\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"112-121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1346-8138.17506\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1346-8138.17506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term outcomes of intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy for rapidly progressive alopecia areata: A single-center retrospective analysis of 106 cases and usefulness evaluation of a scoring system originally designed for half-year efficacy prediction for extended periods
Intravenous corticosteroid pulse therapy (IVPT) has been preferentially conducted for rapidly progressive alopecia areata (RP-AA); however, the evaluation of long-term outcomes has been insufficient. In this study, 106 IVPT-treated RP-AA patients (36 males and 70 females) who were followed up for more than 1 year and up to 6.8 years were retrospectively analyzed. The mean observation period was 1137.8 ± 587.9 days (range 380–2490). The mean severity of alopecia tool (SALT) score before IVPT was 21.3 ± 23.4 but whole-scalp hair loss was observed in all cases after the intervention, suggesting that IVPT was performed soon after the onset. With additional interventions represented by intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection with or without topical potent corticosteroid for those who insufficiently responded at 6 months after IVPT, 64.2%, 14.2%, and 21.7% of the patients respectively achieved good response (GR; SALT score ≤25), moderate response (MR; 25 < SALT score <75), and poor response (PR; 75 ≤ SALT score) 1 year after IVPT. On the final evaluation, the proportions of patients with GR, MR, and PR were 79 (74.5%), 7 (6.6%), and 20 (18.9%). Sixteen patients achieved and maintained full hair regrowth with IVPT alone until the end of observation. A previously reported scoring system for the short-term outcome prediction was shown to be useful for distinguishing the final-point GR responders from PR responders (P = 0.003). Of note, 21 patients were found to have some symptoms suggestive of the existence of preceding infectious diseases and tended to relapse. The revised scoring system adding the absence of preceding infectious diseases as one factor successfully predicted the occurrence of the relapse in our cohort (P = 0.002). Taken together, previously unreported real-world efficacy of IVPT to RP-AA was elucidated with the invention of a tool putatively enabling optimal long-term management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Dermatology is the official peer-reviewed publication of the Japanese Dermatological Association and the Asian Dermatological Association. The journal aims to provide a forum for the exchange of information about new and significant research in dermatology and to promote the discipline of dermatology in Japan and throughout the world. Research articles are supplemented by reviews, theoretical articles, special features, commentaries, book reviews and proceedings of workshops and conferences.
Preliminary or short reports and letters to the editor of two printed pages or less will be published as soon as possible. Papers in all fields of dermatology will be considered.