David Lomeli-Reyes, Gonzalo M Torres-Villalobos, José M Correa-Rovelo, Alejandro Díaz Girón-Gidi, Amado J Athié-Athié, Perla X López-Almanza
{"title":"腹腔镜胃袖状手术与 Roux-Y 腹腔镜胃旁路术对墨西哥肥胖人群长期减肥的影响。","authors":"David Lomeli-Reyes, Gonzalo M Torres-Villalobos, José M Correa-Rovelo, Alejandro Díaz Girón-Gidi, Amado J Athié-Athié, Perla X López-Almanza","doi":"10.24875/CIRU.23000545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare the weight loss results between long-term procedures up to 5 years, after undergoing MGL and RYGB in Mexican patients with obesity and associated comorbidity. The most common bariatric surgical procedures worldwide are, laparoscopic gastric sleeve (MGL) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), as a treatment for weight loss and remission of comorbidity associated with obesity; however, they are the long-term weight loss results in the Mexican population are unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective, observational cohort of patients with obesity undergoing MGL or RYGB in a private hospital Medica Sur, in Mexico City, in the period from 2013 to 2021. Instrumental variables analysis and standardized mean differences were used to calculate outcomes up to 5 years at 5 follow-up visits (S1-S5), at 7 days, 2 months, 6 months, 10 months and 2-5 years after surgery, to compare results of the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients were included in two groups: 31 (30.09%) with MG and 73 (70.87%) with RYGB. The last follow-up (S5), the MG group recorded a mean EW 9.61 kg, EW% 12.72% and EWL% 73.50%, and the RYGB group EW 10.1 kg, EW% 14.72% and EWL% 70.41%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was found between groups for long-term EW loss (p = 0.082); however, there is a greater decrease in weight loss in RYGB at 6-12 months compared to MGL.</p>","PeriodicalId":93936,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia y cirujanos","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of laparoscopic gastric sleeve vs. laparoscopic gastric bypass in Roux-Y on long-term weight loss in obese mexican population.\",\"authors\":\"David Lomeli-Reyes, Gonzalo M Torres-Villalobos, José M Correa-Rovelo, Alejandro Díaz Girón-Gidi, Amado J Athié-Athié, Perla X López-Almanza\",\"doi\":\"10.24875/CIRU.23000545\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Compare the weight loss results between long-term procedures up to 5 years, after undergoing MGL and RYGB in Mexican patients with obesity and associated comorbidity. The most common bariatric surgical procedures worldwide are, laparoscopic gastric sleeve (MGL) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), as a treatment for weight loss and remission of comorbidity associated with obesity; however, they are the long-term weight loss results in the Mexican population are unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Retrospective, observational cohort of patients with obesity undergoing MGL or RYGB in a private hospital Medica Sur, in Mexico City, in the period from 2013 to 2021. Instrumental variables analysis and standardized mean differences were used to calculate outcomes up to 5 years at 5 follow-up visits (S1-S5), at 7 days, 2 months, 6 months, 10 months and 2-5 years after surgery, to compare results of the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients were included in two groups: 31 (30.09%) with MG and 73 (70.87%) with RYGB. The last follow-up (S5), the MG group recorded a mean EW 9.61 kg, EW% 12.72% and EWL% 73.50%, and the RYGB group EW 10.1 kg, EW% 14.72% and EWL% 70.41%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No significant difference was found between groups for long-term EW loss (p = 0.082); however, there is a greater decrease in weight loss in RYGB at 6-12 months compared to MGL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia y cirujanos\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000545\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia y cirujanos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/CIRU.23000545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of laparoscopic gastric sleeve vs. laparoscopic gastric bypass in Roux-Y on long-term weight loss in obese mexican population.
Objective: Compare the weight loss results between long-term procedures up to 5 years, after undergoing MGL and RYGB in Mexican patients with obesity and associated comorbidity. The most common bariatric surgical procedures worldwide are, laparoscopic gastric sleeve (MGL) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), as a treatment for weight loss and remission of comorbidity associated with obesity; however, they are the long-term weight loss results in the Mexican population are unknown.
Method: Retrospective, observational cohort of patients with obesity undergoing MGL or RYGB in a private hospital Medica Sur, in Mexico City, in the period from 2013 to 2021. Instrumental variables analysis and standardized mean differences were used to calculate outcomes up to 5 years at 5 follow-up visits (S1-S5), at 7 days, 2 months, 6 months, 10 months and 2-5 years after surgery, to compare results of the groups.
Results: 104 patients were included in two groups: 31 (30.09%) with MG and 73 (70.87%) with RYGB. The last follow-up (S5), the MG group recorded a mean EW 9.61 kg, EW% 12.72% and EWL% 73.50%, and the RYGB group EW 10.1 kg, EW% 14.72% and EWL% 70.41%.
Conclusions: No significant difference was found between groups for long-term EW loss (p = 0.082); however, there is a greater decrease in weight loss in RYGB at 6-12 months compared to MGL.