Elizabeth C Bond, Suzanne Finley, Elizabeth Pennington, Emily K Reinke, Lewis McGarvey, Grant E Garrigues, Tally E Lassiter, Oke A Anakwenze
{"title":"在肩关节置换术中使用扁平超高分子量聚乙烯肱骨骺端骨水泥限制器","authors":"Elizabeth C Bond, Suzanne Finley, Elizabeth Pennington, Emily K Reinke, Lewis McGarvey, Grant E Garrigues, Tally E Lassiter, Oke A Anakwenze","doi":"10.1177/24715492241291328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When implanting a cemented humeral stem, a reliable method to prevent inappropriate extension and enable pressurization of cement in the intramedullary canal is required. The aim was to assess the outcomes of a dedicated humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total 218 shoulders (207 patients) were included in the study, all of whom underwent a cemented total shoulder arthroplasty and a retrospective review was performed. The primary outcomes of interest were device stability in the medullary canal, successful occlusion of the canal, cement extrusion and quality of cement mantle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the cohort was female (63.3%) males and the average patient age was 71.7 years (SD 8.45). In 81.7% the device was deemed to be stable in the medullary canal. The device was significantly more stable in primary (84.2%) compared to revision cases (64.3%, p = 0.02). In 69.7% Barrack grade A mantle quality was achieved, this was higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%) (p = 0.00006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We noted excellent cementation outcomes using a cement restrictor specifically designed for the diaphyseal humerus anatomy. However, this humeral specific restrictor was noted to be more stable in primary as compared to revision cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":73942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","volume":"8 ","pages":"24715492241291328"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of a Low Profile Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Diaphyseal Humeral Cement Restrictor in Shoulder Arthroplasty.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth C Bond, Suzanne Finley, Elizabeth Pennington, Emily K Reinke, Lewis McGarvey, Grant E Garrigues, Tally E Lassiter, Oke A Anakwenze\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/24715492241291328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When implanting a cemented humeral stem, a reliable method to prevent inappropriate extension and enable pressurization of cement in the intramedullary canal is required. The aim was to assess the outcomes of a dedicated humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total 218 shoulders (207 patients) were included in the study, all of whom underwent a cemented total shoulder arthroplasty and a retrospective review was performed. The primary outcomes of interest were device stability in the medullary canal, successful occlusion of the canal, cement extrusion and quality of cement mantle.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of the cohort was female (63.3%) males and the average patient age was 71.7 years (SD 8.45). In 81.7% the device was deemed to be stable in the medullary canal. The device was significantly more stable in primary (84.2%) compared to revision cases (64.3%, p = 0.02). In 69.7% Barrack grade A mantle quality was achieved, this was higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%) (p = 0.00006).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>We noted excellent cementation outcomes using a cement restrictor specifically designed for the diaphyseal humerus anatomy. However, this humeral specific restrictor was noted to be more stable in primary as compared to revision cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"24715492241291328\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487543/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492241291328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/24715492241291328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:在植入骨水泥肱骨干时,需要一种可靠的方法来防止不适当的伸展,并使骨水泥在髓内管中加压。目的是评估专用肱骨干骺端骨水泥限制器的效果:研究共纳入了218个肩关节(207名患者),所有患者都接受了骨水泥全肩关节置换术,并进行了回顾性审查。研究的主要结果是装置在髓管内的稳定性、髓管的成功闭塞、骨水泥挤出和骨水泥套的质量:大多数患者为女性(63.3%)和男性,平均年龄为 71.7 岁(SD 8.45)。81.7%的患者认为装置在髓管内稳定。与翻修病例(64.3%,P = 0.02)相比,初治病例(84.2%)的装置稳定性明显更高。69.7%的病例达到了巴氏 A 级套管质量,与翻修病例(39.3%)相比,初治病例(74.2%)的套管质量更高(p = 0.00006):讨论:我们注意到,使用专为肱骨二骺解剖学设计的骨水泥限制器可获得极佳的骨水泥固定效果。然而,与翻修病例相比,这种肱骨专用限制器在初治病例中更为稳定。
Use of a Low Profile Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Diaphyseal Humeral Cement Restrictor in Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Background: When implanting a cemented humeral stem, a reliable method to prevent inappropriate extension and enable pressurization of cement in the intramedullary canal is required. The aim was to assess the outcomes of a dedicated humeral diaphyseal cement restrictor.
Methods: In total 218 shoulders (207 patients) were included in the study, all of whom underwent a cemented total shoulder arthroplasty and a retrospective review was performed. The primary outcomes of interest were device stability in the medullary canal, successful occlusion of the canal, cement extrusion and quality of cement mantle.
Results: The majority of the cohort was female (63.3%) males and the average patient age was 71.7 years (SD 8.45). In 81.7% the device was deemed to be stable in the medullary canal. The device was significantly more stable in primary (84.2%) compared to revision cases (64.3%, p = 0.02). In 69.7% Barrack grade A mantle quality was achieved, this was higher in primary cases (74.2%) compared to revision cases (39.3%) (p = 0.00006).
Discussion: We noted excellent cementation outcomes using a cement restrictor specifically designed for the diaphyseal humerus anatomy. However, this humeral specific restrictor was noted to be more stable in primary as compared to revision cases.