硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术用于分娩镇痛的最佳程序间歇硬膜外栓剂量探索:一项偏向硬币上下顺序分配研究。

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yujie Song, Yingcai Song, Zhihao Sheng, Qingsong Zhao, Wei Liu, Yujie Li, Yu Zang, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu
{"title":"硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术用于分娩镇痛的最佳程序间歇硬膜外栓剂量探索:一项偏向硬币上下顺序分配研究。","authors":"Yujie Song, Yingcai Song, Zhihao Sheng, Qingsong Zhao, Wei Liu, Yujie Li, Yu Zang, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV<sub>90</sub>) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup>. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV<sub>90</sub> was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The estimated PIEB EV<sub>90</sub> for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup> approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Song, Yingcai Song, Zhihao Sheng, Qingsong Zhao, Wei Liu, Yujie Li, Yu Zang, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV<sub>90</sub>) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup>. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV<sub>90</sub> was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The estimated PIEB EV<sub>90</sub> for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup> approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在使用硬膜穿刺硬膜外(DPE)技术启动分娩镇痛的第一产程中,为90%的患者(EV90)提供有效镇痛的最佳程序间歇硬膜外栓剂(PIEB)量:我们进行了一项偏向硬币的上下顺序分配研究。我们纳入了 40 名需要硬膜外分娩镇痛的无阴道产妇。我们使用 25G Whitacre 脊柱穿刺针穿刺硬脑膜,然后给予 12 mL 0.1% 罗哌卡因和 0.3 μg-mL-1 舒芬太尼的负荷剂量。随后,PIEB 泵从硬膜外麻醉开始后 1 小时开始,以 40 分钟的固定间隔注入相同的溶液。第一位患者的栓塞量为 7 毫升,随后患者的栓塞量根据研究方案进行调整(栓塞量为 7-12 毫升)。主要终点是有效镇痛,即在镇痛开始后 6 小时内或宫颈完全扩张前(以先到者为准)不需要患者自控或人工栓剂。结果评估人员每小时对患者的疼痛评分、Bromage 评分、感觉阻滞水平和产妇血压进行评估:使用截断 Dixon 和 Mood 法,估计 EV90 为 9.2 mL(95% 置信区间 [CI],8.5 至 9.9),而等渗回归法得出的值为 8.8 mL(95% 置信区间 [CI],8.6 至 9.8)。没有一名患者出现运动阻滞。两名患者出现低血压,但无需使用血管加压药:结论:当DPE与固定的40分钟间隔相结合时,罗哌卡因0.1%和舒芬太尼0.3 μg-mL-1的估计PIEB EV90接近9 mL:研究注册:ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); 2023年1月3日首次提交。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.

Purpose: To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV90) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.

Methods: We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL-1. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.

Results: Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV90 was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.

Conclusions: The estimated PIEB EV90 for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL-1 approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.

Study registration: ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
161
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’ Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content, according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain, perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French, according to the language of submission.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信