{"title":"硬膜穿刺硬膜外技术用于分娩镇痛的最佳程序间歇硬膜外栓剂量探索:一项偏向硬币上下顺序分配研究。","authors":"Yujie Song, Yingcai Song, Zhihao Sheng, Qingsong Zhao, Wei Liu, Yujie Li, Yu Zang, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu","doi":"10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV<sub>90</sub>) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup>. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV<sub>90</sub> was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The estimated PIEB EV<sub>90</sub> for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup> approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.</p>","PeriodicalId":56145,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.\",\"authors\":\"Yujie Song, Yingcai Song, Zhihao Sheng, Qingsong Zhao, Wei Liu, Yujie Li, Yu Zang, Zhendong Xu, Zhiqiang Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV<sub>90</sub>) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup>. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV<sub>90</sub> was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The estimated PIEB EV<sub>90</sub> for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL<sup>-1</sup> approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia-Journal Canadien D Anesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-024-02855-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploration of the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus volume with the dural puncture epidural technique for labour analgesia: a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study.
Purpose: To determine the optimal programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) volume for providing effective analgesia in 90% of patients (EV90) during the first stage of labour using the dural puncture epidural (DPE) technique to initiate labour analgesia.
Methods: We conducted a biased-coin up-and-down sequential allocation study. We included 40 nulliparous women requiring epidural labour analgesia. We used a 25G Whitacre spinal needle to puncture the dural mater and then administered a loading dose of 12 mL of ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL-1. Subsequently, the PIEB pump delivered boluses with an identical solution at a fixed 40-min interval, starting 1 hr after epidural initiation. The bolus volume for the first patient was 7 mL and was adjusted for subsequent patients according to the study protocol (bolus volume, 7-12 mL). The primary endpoint was effective analgesia, indicated by no need for patient-controlled or manual boluses within 6 hr after analgesia initiation or until complete cervical dilation, whichever came first. Outcome evaluators assessed the patients' pain ratings, Bromage scores, sensory blockade level, and maternal blood pressure hourly.
Results: Using the truncated Dixon and Mood method, the estimated EV90 was 9.2 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5 to 9.9) whereas the isotonic regression method yielded a value of 8.8 mL (95% CI, 8.6 to 9.8). None of the patients experienced a motor block. Two patients experienced hypotension without the need for vasopressors.
Conclusions: The estimated PIEB EV90 for ropivacaine 0.1% and sufentanil 0.3 μg·mL-1 approached 9 mL when DPE was combined with a fixed 40-min interval.
Study registration: ChiCTR.org.cn ( ChiCTR2300067281 ); first submitted 3 January 2023.
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Journal of Anesthesia (the Journal) is owned by the Canadian Anesthesiologists’
Society and is published by Springer Science + Business Media, LLM (New York). From the
first year of publication in 1954, the international exposure of the Journal has broadened
considerably, with articles now received from over 50 countries. The Journal is published
monthly, and has an impact Factor (mean journal citation frequency) of 2.127 (in 2012). Article
types consist of invited editorials, reports of original investigations (clinical and basic sciences
articles), case reports/case series, review articles, systematic reviews, accredited continuing
professional development (CPD) modules, and Letters to the Editor. The editorial content,
according to the mission statement, spans the fields of anesthesia, acute and chronic pain,
perioperative medicine and critical care. In addition, the Journal publishes practice guidelines
and standards articles relevant to clinicians. Articles are published either in English or in French,
according to the language of submission.