接受腹部和胸部手术并持续胸腔硬膜外镇痛的患者尽早拔除导尿管对术后尿潴留的影响

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Visceral Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1159/000540740
Ahmed Alwali, Ernst Klar, Imad Kamaleddine, Aenne Glass, Matthias Leuchter, Clemens Schafmayer, Eberhard Grambow
{"title":"接受腹部和胸部手术并持续胸腔硬膜外镇痛的患者尽早拔除导尿管对术后尿潴留的影响","authors":"Ahmed Alwali, Ernst Klar, Imad Kamaleddine, Aenne Glass, Matthias Leuchter, Clemens Schafmayer, Eberhard Grambow","doi":"10.1159/000540740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient's comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases - two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (<i>p</i> = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (<i>p</i> = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; <i>p</i> = 0.3) were similar between both study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"40 5","pages":"256-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466447/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention.\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Alwali, Ernst Klar, Imad Kamaleddine, Aenne Glass, Matthias Leuchter, Clemens Schafmayer, Eberhard Grambow\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540740\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient's comfort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases - two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (<i>p</i> = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (<i>p</i> = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; <i>p</i> = 0.3) were similar between both study groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visceral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"256-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466447/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visceral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540740\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:术后连续胸硬膜外镇痛(TEA)是腹部和胸部大手术后疼痛治疗的一个重要方面。在 TEA 的作用下,术后尿潴留(POUR)经常出现,因此通常的做法是保留经尿道导尿管(UC)直到 TEA 停止,以避免重新插入 UC 的必要性。本研究分析了在 TEA 期间尽早拔除膀胱导尿管对 POUR 发生率的影响:这项回顾性研究针对 71 名接受择期腹部和胸部手术的患者进行,术后使用 TEA 控制疼痛。根据 UC 拔出时间与硬膜外导管拔出时间的关系,将患者分为两组。早期移除组(ERG)在手术后 3 天内移除 UC,而标准组(SG)则在完成 TEA 后移除 UC。在拔除 UC 时,ERG 组的所有患者仍在接受 TEA 治疗。评估的主要结果是POUR的发生率,次要结果包括尿路感染(UTI)、住院时间(LOS)和患者的舒适度:POUR的总发生率为7%,其中5例为POUR--41名SG患者中有2例(4.9%),30名ERG患者中有3例(10%)(P = 0.644)。ERG 和 SG 的 POUR 发生率无明显差异(p = 0.644)。此外,研究中未观察到尿毒症。两组患者术后 72 小时和 96 小时的疼痛评分(视觉模拟量表 [VAS])以及 LOS(SG:16.74 [±8.39] 天;ERG:14.53 [±6.99] 天;p = 0.3)相似:根据我们的研究结果,可以得出结论:在术后早期,即使是在 TEA 期间,也可以安全地切除 UC,而不会显著增加再次导管插入的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention.

Background: Postoperative continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is an integral aspect of pain management after major abdominal and thoracic surgery. Under TEA, postoperative urinary retention (POUR) is frequently noted, prompting a common practice of maintaining the transurethral catheter (UC) until the cessation of TEA to avoid the necessity for reinsertion of the UC. This study analyzes the effect of an early bladder catheter removal during TEA on POUR incidence.

Methods: The retrospective study was conducted on 71 patients undergoing elective abdominal and thoracic operations with TEA for postoperative pain control. Patients were divided into two groups based on the UC removal time in relation to the epidural catheter removal. In the early removal group (ERG), the UC was removed within 3 days of surgery, while in the standard group (SG), it was removed after completion of TEA. All patients in the ERG were still receiving TEA at the time of the UC removal. The primary outcome assessed was the incidence of POUR, while secondary outcomes included urinary tract infections (UTI), hospital length of stay (LOS), and patient's comfort.

Results: The overall prevalence of POUR was 7%, with five POUR cases - two (4.9%) of 41 patients in SG and three (10%) of 30 in ERG (p = 0.644). No significant difference was found in POUR occurrence between ERG and SG (p = 0.644). Additionally, no UTIs were observed in the study. The postoperative pain scores (visual analog scale [VAS]) 72 h and 96 h and the LOS (SG: 16.74 [±8.39] days; ERG: 14.53 [±6.99] days; p = 0.3) were similar between both study groups.

Conclusion: Based on our results, it can be concluded that the removal of UC in the early postoperative period, even during TEA, can be performed safely without significantly increasing the risk of recatheterization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信