Mansoor Malik, Martina Penalosa, Isolde Martina Busch, Haroon Burhanullah, Christine Weston, Kristina Weeks, Cheryl Connors, Henry J Michtalik, George Everly, Albert W Wu
{"title":"农村医疗工作者的福祉:对支持干预措施的系统回顾。","authors":"Mansoor Malik, Martina Penalosa, Isolde Martina Busch, Haroon Burhanullah, Christine Weston, Kristina Weeks, Cheryl Connors, Henry J Michtalik, George Everly, Albert W Wu","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there is increased awareness about healthcare workers' (HCWs') stress and burnout after the COVID-19 pandemic, support interventions should be tailored according to the needs of HCWs. Given the unique challenges rural HCWs face, we sought to systematically identify the types of interventions specifically designed and utilized to support the well-being of HCWs practicing in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature through electronic databases to identify quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies describing supportive interventions for rural HCWs with well-being-related outcomes between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2023. We used the Effective Public Health Practice Project, Mixed Methods Assessment Tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist to evaluate the study quality.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of 1,583 identified records, 25 studies were included in the analysis. The studies described a wide range of supportive interventions and outcomes. The overall quality of the studies was weak to moderate. None of the studies were randomized and only six included controls. Included interventions were generally well- accepted. Quantitative and qualitative themes identified shared decision making, effective supervision, and proactive cultural change as promising interventions that warrant further exploration. Financial interventions alone were not effective. Most of the studies were either unfunded or were funded internally by the institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited research in support interventions for rural HCWs. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to explore promising interventions to promote well-being of rural healthcare workforce. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":"42 3","pages":"355-374"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rural healthcare workers' well-being: A systematic review of support interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Mansoor Malik, Martina Penalosa, Isolde Martina Busch, Haroon Burhanullah, Christine Weston, Kristina Weeks, Cheryl Connors, Henry J Michtalik, George Everly, Albert W Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/fsh0000921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although there is increased awareness about healthcare workers' (HCWs') stress and burnout after the COVID-19 pandemic, support interventions should be tailored according to the needs of HCWs. Given the unique challenges rural HCWs face, we sought to systematically identify the types of interventions specifically designed and utilized to support the well-being of HCWs practicing in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature through electronic databases to identify quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies describing supportive interventions for rural HCWs with well-being-related outcomes between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2023. We used the Effective Public Health Practice Project, Mixed Methods Assessment Tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist to evaluate the study quality.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Out of 1,583 identified records, 25 studies were included in the analysis. The studies described a wide range of supportive interventions and outcomes. The overall quality of the studies was weak to moderate. None of the studies were randomized and only six included controls. Included interventions were generally well- accepted. Quantitative and qualitative themes identified shared decision making, effective supervision, and proactive cultural change as promising interventions that warrant further exploration. Financial interventions alone were not effective. Most of the studies were either unfunded or were funded internally by the institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is limited research in support interventions for rural HCWs. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to explore promising interventions to promote well-being of rural healthcare workforce. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55612,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"volume\":\"42 3\",\"pages\":\"355-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Systems & Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000921\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000921","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:尽管在 COVID-19 大流行之后,人们对医护人员(HCWs)的压力和职业倦怠有了更多的认识,但支持干预措施应根据医护人员的需求量身定制。鉴于农村医护人员所面临的独特挑战,我们试图系统地确定专门设计和使用的干预措施类型,以支持在农村环境中工作的医护人员的福祉:我们通过电子数据库对现有文献进行了全面检索,以确定在 2023 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 3 月 31 日期间针对农村医护人员的支持性干预措施的定量、定性和混合方法研究。我们使用有效公共卫生实践项目、混合方法评估工具和乔安娜-布里格斯研究所批判性评估清单来评估研究质量:在已确认的 1583 条记录中,有 25 项研究被纳入分析。这些研究描述了广泛的支持性干预措施和结果。这些研究的总体质量为弱至中等。没有一项研究采用随机方法,只有六项研究纳入了对照组。纳入的干预措施普遍得到认可。定量和定性主题将共同决策、有效监督和积极的文化变革确定为有前途的干预措施,值得进一步探讨。单纯的财务干预并不有效。大多数研究要么没有资金,要么是由机构内部资助的:结论:针对农村医护人员的支持性干预措施研究有限。结论:针对农村医护人员的支持性干预措施的研究很有限,需要进行更大规模、精心设计的研究,以探索促进农村医护人员福祉的可行干预措施。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved)。
Rural healthcare workers' well-being: A systematic review of support interventions.
Introduction: Although there is increased awareness about healthcare workers' (HCWs') stress and burnout after the COVID-19 pandemic, support interventions should be tailored according to the needs of HCWs. Given the unique challenges rural HCWs face, we sought to systematically identify the types of interventions specifically designed and utilized to support the well-being of HCWs practicing in rural settings.
Method: We conducted a comprehensive search of the existing literature through electronic databases to identify quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies describing supportive interventions for rural HCWs with well-being-related outcomes between January 1, 2023 and March 31, 2023. We used the Effective Public Health Practice Project, Mixed Methods Assessment Tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist to evaluate the study quality.
Findings: Out of 1,583 identified records, 25 studies were included in the analysis. The studies described a wide range of supportive interventions and outcomes. The overall quality of the studies was weak to moderate. None of the studies were randomized and only six included controls. Included interventions were generally well- accepted. Quantitative and qualitative themes identified shared decision making, effective supervision, and proactive cultural change as promising interventions that warrant further exploration. Financial interventions alone were not effective. Most of the studies were either unfunded or were funded internally by the institutions.
Conclusions: There is limited research in support interventions for rural HCWs. Larger, well-designed studies are needed to explore promising interventions to promote well-being of rural healthcare workforce. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Families Systems & HealthHEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍:
Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.