控球还是定位球?足球比赛的关键是什么?

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-08 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086
Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena
{"title":"控球还是定位球?足球比赛的关键是什么?","authors":"Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m<sup>2</sup> per payer), medium (60-90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and large (> 90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations lower than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h<sup>-1</sup>, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations higher than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> compared to medium and small size (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possession or position games: What is the key in soccer?\",\"authors\":\"Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m<sup>2</sup> per payer), medium (60-90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and large (> 90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations lower than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h<sup>-1</sup>, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations higher than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> compared to medium and small size (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是比较控球比赛和定位球比赛的跑动表现,并描述在不同尺寸的球场上进行相同定位球比赛时的外部负荷。使用 GPS 系统(WIMU Pro,RealTrack Systems 公司,西班牙阿尔梅里亚)监测了 25 名职业足球运动员在 18 场控球(无标准化角色定位)和 18 场定位(有特定角色定位)比赛中的跑动需求,比赛形式为 9 vs. 9 + 2 浮球。每种比赛形式的规模分别为小型(每名球员小于 60 平方米)、中型(每名球员 60-90 平方米)和大型(每名球员大于 90 平方米)。与控球比赛相比,定位比赛的覆盖距离、峰值速度和球员负荷值明显较低(所有数据均小于 0.05)。然而,阵地战比赛的最大加速度、最大减速度、加速度大于 3 米-秒-2 和减速度小于 -3 米-秒-2 的数值明显高于控球比赛(所有 p 均小于 0.05)。同样,大型阵地战比赛的跑动距离、跑动距离大于 21 公里-小时-1、峰值速度和球员负荷值也明显高于中小型阵地战比赛。此外,与中型和小型运动会相比,大型运动会的最大加速度和减速度值明显高于小型运动会,加速度和减速度明显低于中型和小型运动会,加速度低于 3 米-秒-2 和减速度高于-3 米-秒-2 的运动会也明显少于小型运动会(所有数据均为 p <0.05)。练习者应牢记在训练中使用这些游戏及其大小来改变球员的外部负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Possession or position games: What is the key in soccer?

The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m2 per payer), medium (60-90 m2 per player) and large (> 90 m2 per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all p < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s-2 and decelerations lower than -3 m · s-2 than possession games (all p < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h-1, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s-2 and decelerations higher than -3 m · s-2 compared to medium and small size (all p < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信