Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena
{"title":"控球还是定位球?足球比赛的关键是什么?","authors":"Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m<sup>2</sup> per payer), medium (60-90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and large (> 90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations lower than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h<sup>-1</sup>, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations higher than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> compared to medium and small size (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475009/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Possession or position games: What is the key in soccer?\",\"authors\":\"Jose A Asian-Clemente, Borja Muñoz, Jose Vicente Beltran-Garrido, Bernardo Requena\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m<sup>2</sup> per payer), medium (60-90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) and large (> 90 m<sup>2</sup> per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations lower than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> than possession games (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h<sup>-1</sup>, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> and decelerations higher than -3 m · s<sup>-2</sup> compared to medium and small size (all <i>p</i> < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11475009/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.136086","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Possession or position games: What is the key in soccer?
The aims of this study were to compare the running performance of possession and position games and to describe the external load of the same position game played on pitches of different dimensions. Using a GPS system (WIMU Pro, RealTrack Systems, Almería, Spain), the running demands of 25 professional soccer players were monitored during 18 possession (without a standardized role position) and 18 positional (with a specific role position) games of 9 vs. 9 + 2 floaters. Each format was developed in small (< 60 m2 per payer), medium (60-90 m2 per player) and large (> 90 m2 per player) sizes. Position games obtained significantly lower distance covered, peak speed and player load values than possession games (all p < 0.05). However, position games obtained significantly higher values of maximal acceleration, maximal deceleration, accelerations higher than 3 m · s-2 and decelerations lower than -3 m · s-2 than possession games (all p < 0.05). Likewise, large position games obtained significantly higher values of distance covered, distance covered > 21 km · h-1, peak speed and player load than small and medium sizes. Large size also showed significantly higher values of maximal acceleration and deceleration than small size, significantly fewer accelerations and decelerations, and fewer accelerations lower than 3 m · s-2 and decelerations higher than -3 m · s-2 compared to medium and small size (all p < 0.05). Practitioners should keep in mind the use of these games and their size to modify the external load of the players during their training.
期刊介绍:
Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984.
Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.