在精英男子足球队的密集赛程中,在单次训练中结合两天结构时的微循环工作量特征。

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Biology of Sport Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-18 DOI:10.5114/biolsport.2024.132992
Antonio Gómez-Díaz, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Pedro Menezes, João Barreira, Pedro Figueiredo, Diogo Coutinho
{"title":"在精英男子足球队的密集赛程中,在单次训练中结合两天结构时的微循环工作量特征。","authors":"Antonio Gómez-Díaz, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Pedro Menezes, João Barreira, Pedro Figueiredo, Diogo Coutinho","doi":"10.5114/biolsport.2024.132992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to describe and compare specific matchdays sessions and playing positions external load during congested fixtures in elite football when combining the objectives from two different training days in one session. Data was collected from 27 players from the 1<sup>st</sup> Brazilian division (28.7 ± 18.61 years) that participated in the following training days during congested fixtures (n = 16 weeks): a) Match day+1 (MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup>, session 1 day after the game with tasks from MD+1 and MD-2 sessions, n = 9); b) Matchday-2 (MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup>, session 2 days prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-2 and MD+2 sessions, n = 11); c) Matchday-1 (MD-1<sup>MD+2</sup>, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+2 sessions, n = 12); and d) Matchday-1 (MD-1<sup>MD+3</sup>, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+3 sessions, n = 11). External load was collected with global positioning systems, while internal load with the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> showed higher total distance covered (F = 116.92, p < 0.001) and player load (F = 56.67, p < 0.001) values than the other three training days, while both the MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> and MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup> revealed higher distance covered at high-speed running (F = 22.43, p < 0.001) and high metabolic load distance covered (F = 75.98, p < 0.001) than both MD-1 sessions. Fullbacks covered higher high-speed running distance (F = 3.6, p = 0.033) than center backs, while midfielders reported higher RPE (F = 5.29, p = 0.003) values than defensive midfielders and fullbacks. Coaches may use the MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> to emphasize total distance covered, while both MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> and MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup> to promote HSR and HML distance compared to MD-1 sessions. In addition, combining training sessions allows to normalize external load across playing positions with the exception of fullbacks that are exposed to higher stimulus.</p>","PeriodicalId":55365,"journal":{"name":"Biology of Sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474999/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterizing microcycles' workload when combining two days structure within single training sessions during congested fixtures in an elite male soccer team.\",\"authors\":\"Antonio Gómez-Díaz, Fábio Yuzo Nakamura, Pedro Menezes, João Barreira, Pedro Figueiredo, Diogo Coutinho\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/biolsport.2024.132992\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to describe and compare specific matchdays sessions and playing positions external load during congested fixtures in elite football when combining the objectives from two different training days in one session. Data was collected from 27 players from the 1<sup>st</sup> Brazilian division (28.7 ± 18.61 years) that participated in the following training days during congested fixtures (n = 16 weeks): a) Match day+1 (MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup>, session 1 day after the game with tasks from MD+1 and MD-2 sessions, n = 9); b) Matchday-2 (MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup>, session 2 days prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-2 and MD+2 sessions, n = 11); c) Matchday-1 (MD-1<sup>MD+2</sup>, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+2 sessions, n = 12); and d) Matchday-1 (MD-1<sup>MD+3</sup>, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+3 sessions, n = 11). External load was collected with global positioning systems, while internal load with the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> showed higher total distance covered (F = 116.92, p < 0.001) and player load (F = 56.67, p < 0.001) values than the other three training days, while both the MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> and MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup> revealed higher distance covered at high-speed running (F = 22.43, p < 0.001) and high metabolic load distance covered (F = 75.98, p < 0.001) than both MD-1 sessions. Fullbacks covered higher high-speed running distance (F = 3.6, p = 0.033) than center backs, while midfielders reported higher RPE (F = 5.29, p = 0.003) values than defensive midfielders and fullbacks. Coaches may use the MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> to emphasize total distance covered, while both MD+1<sup>MD-2</sup> and MD-2<sup>MD+2</sup> to promote HSR and HML distance compared to MD-1 sessions. In addition, combining training sessions allows to normalize external load across playing positions with the exception of fullbacks that are exposed to higher stimulus.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474999/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biology of Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.132992\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biology of Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2024.132992","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述和比较在精英足球比赛中,当把两个不同训练日的目标结合在一次训练中时,特定比赛日的课程和比赛位置在拥挤赛程中的外部负荷。研究收集了巴西甲级联赛 27 名球员(28.7 ± 18.61岁)的数据,他们在拥挤的赛程中参加了以下训练日(n = 16周):a) 比赛日+1(MD+1MD-2,比赛后 1 天的训练,包括 MD+1 和 MD-2 训练,n=9); b) 比赛日-2(MD-2MD+2,比赛前 2 天的训练,包括 MD-2 和 MD+2 训练,n=11);c) 比赛日-1(MD-1MD+2,随后比赛前 1 天的训练,任务来自 MD-1 和 MD+2 训练,n = 12);以及 d) 比赛日-1(MD-1MD+3,随后比赛前 1 天的训练,任务来自 MD-1 和 MD+3 训练,n = 11)。外部负荷是通过全球定位系统收集的,而内部负荷则是通过感知用力评分(RPE)收集的。与其他三个训练日相比,MD+1MD-2 显示了更高的总覆盖距离(F = 116.92,p < 0.001)和球员负荷(F = 56.67,p < 0.001)值,而 MD+1MD-2 和 MD-2MD+2 显示了更高的高速跑覆盖距离(F = 22.43,p < 0.001)和高代谢负荷覆盖距离(F = 75.98,p < 0.001)。后卫的高速奔跑距离(F = 3.6,p = 0.033)高于中后卫,而中场球员的 RPE 值(F = 5.29,p = 0.003)高于防守型中场和后卫。与 MD-1 课程相比,教练可使用 MD+1MD-2 强调总距离,而 MD+1MD-2 和 MD-2MD+2 则促进 HSR 和 HML 距离。此外,除了后卫受到的刺激更大外,合并训练课可以使各位置球员的外部负荷正常化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterizing microcycles' workload when combining two days structure within single training sessions during congested fixtures in an elite male soccer team.

This study aimed to describe and compare specific matchdays sessions and playing positions external load during congested fixtures in elite football when combining the objectives from two different training days in one session. Data was collected from 27 players from the 1st Brazilian division (28.7 ± 18.61 years) that participated in the following training days during congested fixtures (n = 16 weeks): a) Match day+1 (MD+1MD-2, session 1 day after the game with tasks from MD+1 and MD-2 sessions, n = 9); b) Matchday-2 (MD-2MD+2, session 2 days prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-2 and MD+2 sessions, n = 11); c) Matchday-1 (MD-1MD+2, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+2 sessions, n = 12); and d) Matchday-1 (MD-1MD+3, session 1 day prior to subsequent match with tasks from MD-1 and MD+3 sessions, n = 11). External load was collected with global positioning systems, while internal load with the rating of perceived exertion (RPE). The MD+1MD-2 showed higher total distance covered (F = 116.92, p < 0.001) and player load (F = 56.67, p < 0.001) values than the other three training days, while both the MD+1MD-2 and MD-2MD+2 revealed higher distance covered at high-speed running (F = 22.43, p < 0.001) and high metabolic load distance covered (F = 75.98, p < 0.001) than both MD-1 sessions. Fullbacks covered higher high-speed running distance (F = 3.6, p = 0.033) than center backs, while midfielders reported higher RPE (F = 5.29, p = 0.003) values than defensive midfielders and fullbacks. Coaches may use the MD+1MD-2 to emphasize total distance covered, while both MD+1MD-2 and MD-2MD+2 to promote HSR and HML distance compared to MD-1 sessions. In addition, combining training sessions allows to normalize external load across playing positions with the exception of fullbacks that are exposed to higher stimulus.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biology of Sport
Biology of Sport 生物-运动科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
113
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biology of Sport is the official journal of the Institute of Sport in Warsaw, Poland, published since 1984. Biology of Sport is an international scientific peer-reviewed journal, published quarterly in both paper and electronic format. The journal publishes articles concerning basic and applied sciences in sport: sports and exercise physiology, sports immunology and medicine, sports genetics, training and testing, pharmacology, as well as in other biological aspects related to sport. Priority is given to inter-disciplinary papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信