胸部 X 光片上冠状动脉钙化和瓣膜/血管钙化的机会性识别:单次曝光双能量成像的改进。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Patrik Rogalla, Jonatas Favero Prietto Dos Santos, Bernd J Wintersperger, Jay Potipcoe, Steve Tilley, Nathan Speck, Neda Afkhami, Karim S Karim, Sean Carey, Farah Cadour, Felipe Sanchez Tijmes
{"title":"胸部 X 光片上冠状动脉钙化和瓣膜/血管钙化的机会性识别:单次曝光双能量成像的改进。","authors":"Patrik Rogalla, Jonatas Favero Prietto Dos Santos, Bernd J Wintersperger, Jay Potipcoe, Steve Tilley, Nathan Speck, Neda Afkhami, Karim S Karim, Sean Carey, Farah Cadour, Felipe Sanchez Tijmes","doi":"10.1177/08465371241291699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate whether single-exposure, dual-energy chest X-ray (DEX) improves visualization of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and valve/vascular calcifications compared to conventional X-ray. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Sixty-one bone-marrow transplant patients (22- 79 years; median 61; IQR 15; w/m, 24/37), underwent single-exposure dual-energy X-ray (Reveal 35C, KA imaging) in pa and lateral projection, followed by a standard-of-care chest CT. Two DEX pairs (pa/lateral) were calculated: a composite image (COMP) and a bone image with soft-tissue subtraction (BI). The COMP pair was reviewed by 2 chest radiologists, assessing the presence/absence of CAC and valve/vascular calcifications on a confidence scale from -2 (confidently not present) to 2 (confidently present). Subsequently, the BI pair was revealed, and readers reevaluated both pairs (COMP and BI) jointly using the identical scale. CTCAC scores were categorized according to the CAC-DRS (0-3) and served as standard of reference, valve/vascular calcifications were categorized on CT as present or absent. <b>Results:</b> For detecting CAC on DEX in any CAC-DRS category (1-3), in category 2-3, in category 3, and for valve/vascular calcifications, the ROC-AUC (combined for both readers) for COMP images was 0.74 (CI: 0.64-0.84), 0.81 (CI: 0.68-0.94), 0.84 (CI: 0.69-0.98), and 0.90 (CI: 0.83-0.99), and for the BI images 0.91 (CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (CI: 0.86- 1.00), 0.89 (CI: 0.77-1.00), and 0.98 (CI: 0.96-1.00), with <i>P</i> = .0003, <i>P</i> = .044, <i>P</i> = .42, and <i>P</i> = .55, respectively. The Intraclass-Correlation-Coefficient (ICC) for CAC on COMP/BI was 0.973/0.954, and for valve/vascular calcifications 0.971/0.965. <b>Conclusion:</b> Single-exposure, dual-energy acquisition improves diagnostic confidence for coronary artery calcium and valve/vascular calcification identification on chest X-rays.</p>","PeriodicalId":55290,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","volume":" ","pages":"8465371241291699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opportunistic Identification of Coronary Artery Calcium and Valve/Vascular Calcifications on Chest X-Ray: Improvements With Single-Exposure Dual-Energy Imaging.\",\"authors\":\"Patrik Rogalla, Jonatas Favero Prietto Dos Santos, Bernd J Wintersperger, Jay Potipcoe, Steve Tilley, Nathan Speck, Neda Afkhami, Karim S Karim, Sean Carey, Farah Cadour, Felipe Sanchez Tijmes\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08465371241291699\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> To evaluate whether single-exposure, dual-energy chest X-ray (DEX) improves visualization of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and valve/vascular calcifications compared to conventional X-ray. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> Sixty-one bone-marrow transplant patients (22- 79 years; median 61; IQR 15; w/m, 24/37), underwent single-exposure dual-energy X-ray (Reveal 35C, KA imaging) in pa and lateral projection, followed by a standard-of-care chest CT. Two DEX pairs (pa/lateral) were calculated: a composite image (COMP) and a bone image with soft-tissue subtraction (BI). The COMP pair was reviewed by 2 chest radiologists, assessing the presence/absence of CAC and valve/vascular calcifications on a confidence scale from -2 (confidently not present) to 2 (confidently present). Subsequently, the BI pair was revealed, and readers reevaluated both pairs (COMP and BI) jointly using the identical scale. CTCAC scores were categorized according to the CAC-DRS (0-3) and served as standard of reference, valve/vascular calcifications were categorized on CT as present or absent. <b>Results:</b> For detecting CAC on DEX in any CAC-DRS category (1-3), in category 2-3, in category 3, and for valve/vascular calcifications, the ROC-AUC (combined for both readers) for COMP images was 0.74 (CI: 0.64-0.84), 0.81 (CI: 0.68-0.94), 0.84 (CI: 0.69-0.98), and 0.90 (CI: 0.83-0.99), and for the BI images 0.91 (CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (CI: 0.86- 1.00), 0.89 (CI: 0.77-1.00), and 0.98 (CI: 0.96-1.00), with <i>P</i> = .0003, <i>P</i> = .044, <i>P</i> = .42, and <i>P</i> = .55, respectively. The Intraclass-Correlation-Coefficient (ICC) for CAC on COMP/BI was 0.973/0.954, and for valve/vascular calcifications 0.971/0.965. <b>Conclusion:</b> Single-exposure, dual-energy acquisition improves diagnostic confidence for coronary artery calcium and valve/vascular calcification identification on chest X-rays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8465371241291699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371241291699\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal-Journal De L Association Canadienne Des Radiologistes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08465371241291699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与传统 X 光片相比,评估单曝光双能量胸部 X 光片(DEX)是否能改善冠状动脉钙化(CAC)和瓣膜/血管钙化的可视性。材料和方法:61 名骨髓移植患者(22-79 岁;中位数 61;IQR 15;男女比例 24/37)接受了单次曝光双能量 X 光(Reveal 35C,KA 成像)的正侧位和侧位投影检查,随后接受了标准胸部 CT 检查。计算了两个 DEX 对(pa/侧位):一个复合图像(COMP)和一个带软组织减影的骨图像(BI)。COMP 图像对由 2 名胸部放射科医生进行审查,按照从-2(确信不存在)到 2(确信存在)的置信度来评估是否存在 CAC 和瓣膜/血管钙化。随后,BI 对被揭示,读者使用相同的量表共同对这两对(COMP 和 BI)进行重新评估。CTCAC评分根据CAC-DRS(0-3)进行分类并作为参考标准,CT上的瓣膜/血管钙化分为存在和不存在。结果在 DEX 上检测任何 CAC-DRS 类别(1-3)、类别 2-3、类别 3 中的 CAC 以及瓣膜/血管钙化时,COMP 图像的 ROC-AUC (两位读者的综合结果)分别为 0.74(CI:0.64-0.84)、0.81(CI:0.68-0.94)、0.84(CI:0.69-0.98)和 0.90(CI:0.83-0.99),BI 图像分别为 0.91(CI:0.83-0.98)、0.94(CI:0.86- 1.00)、0.89(CI:0.77-1.00)和 0.98(CI:0.96-1.00),P = .0003、P = .044、P = .42 和 P = .55。COMP/BI上CAC的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.973/0.954,瓣膜/血管钙化的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.971/0.965。结论单曝光双能量采集提高了胸部 X 光片上冠状动脉钙化和瓣膜/血管钙化识别的诊断可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Opportunistic Identification of Coronary Artery Calcium and Valve/Vascular Calcifications on Chest X-Ray: Improvements With Single-Exposure Dual-Energy Imaging.

Purpose: To evaluate whether single-exposure, dual-energy chest X-ray (DEX) improves visualization of coronary artery calcium (CAC) and valve/vascular calcifications compared to conventional X-ray. Materials and Methods: Sixty-one bone-marrow transplant patients (22- 79 years; median 61; IQR 15; w/m, 24/37), underwent single-exposure dual-energy X-ray (Reveal 35C, KA imaging) in pa and lateral projection, followed by a standard-of-care chest CT. Two DEX pairs (pa/lateral) were calculated: a composite image (COMP) and a bone image with soft-tissue subtraction (BI). The COMP pair was reviewed by 2 chest radiologists, assessing the presence/absence of CAC and valve/vascular calcifications on a confidence scale from -2 (confidently not present) to 2 (confidently present). Subsequently, the BI pair was revealed, and readers reevaluated both pairs (COMP and BI) jointly using the identical scale. CTCAC scores were categorized according to the CAC-DRS (0-3) and served as standard of reference, valve/vascular calcifications were categorized on CT as present or absent. Results: For detecting CAC on DEX in any CAC-DRS category (1-3), in category 2-3, in category 3, and for valve/vascular calcifications, the ROC-AUC (combined for both readers) for COMP images was 0.74 (CI: 0.64-0.84), 0.81 (CI: 0.68-0.94), 0.84 (CI: 0.69-0.98), and 0.90 (CI: 0.83-0.99), and for the BI images 0.91 (CI: 0.83-0.98), 0.94 (CI: 0.86- 1.00), 0.89 (CI: 0.77-1.00), and 0.98 (CI: 0.96-1.00), with P = .0003, P = .044, P = .42, and P = .55, respectively. The Intraclass-Correlation-Coefficient (ICC) for CAC on COMP/BI was 0.973/0.954, and for valve/vascular calcifications 0.971/0.965. Conclusion: Single-exposure, dual-energy acquisition improves diagnostic confidence for coronary artery calcium and valve/vascular calcification identification on chest X-rays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
12.90%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal is a peer-reviewed, Medline-indexed publication that presents a broad scientific review of radiology in Canada. The Journal covers such topics as abdominal imaging, cardiovascular radiology, computed tomography, continuing professional development, education and training, gastrointestinal radiology, health policy and practice, magnetic resonance imaging, musculoskeletal radiology, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, pediatric radiology, radiology history, radiology practice guidelines and advisories, thoracic and cardiac imaging, trauma and emergency room imaging, ultrasonography, and vascular and interventional radiology. Article types considered for publication include original research articles, critically appraised topics, review articles, guest editorials, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letter to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信