{"title":"随机对照试验:比较有无进行心内超声心动图检查的经脐穿刺培训。","authors":"Qi Guo, Caihua Sang, Yiwei Lai, Mingyang Gao, Xueyuan Guo, Wenli Dai, Songnan Li, Nian Liu, Song Zuo, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma","doi":"10.1111/pace.15081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Training of Transseptal Puncture With or Without Intracardiac Echocardiography.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Guo, Caihua Sang, Yiwei Lai, Mingyang Gao, Xueyuan Guo, Wenli Dai, Songnan Li, Nian Liu, Song Zuo, Deyong Long, Jianzeng Dong, Changsheng Ma\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pace.15081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ChineseClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2200058377.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15081\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Training of Transseptal Puncture With or Without Intracardiac Echocardiography.
Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) has been widely used in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the value of ICE in the training of transseptal puncture (TSP) is unclear.
Methods: ICE-Training Study was a single-center, parallel-group, unmasked, randomized controlled trial registered in ChineseClinicalTrials.gov. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to different groups (1) the ICE simulator training group (ICE-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed under the guidance of both ICE and x-ray; and (2) the conventional simulator training group (Con-ST), in which TSP was trained and performed only under the guidance of x-ray. The trainees need to undergo the training stage and the evaluation stage.
Results: From October 2022 to December 2022, 18 consecutive fellows (age 32.4 ± 4.4 years, 12 males) without experience of TSP were included. The training period (16.9 ± 6.6 vs. 29.6 ± 8.7 times, p = 0.003) and the fluoroscopy time (120.3 ± 25.3 vs. 189.3 ± 40.2 s, p < 0.001) of the ICE-ST group was significantly shorter than that of the Con-ST group. No significant difference was found in the comprehensive performance of TSP in the ICE-ST group (composite score 96.7 ± 5.7) and the Con-ST group (composite score 95.9 ± 6.3, p = 0.62), but the selection of TSP sites in the ICE-ST group was commonly better than that in the Con-ST group.
Conclusions: ICE could improve the efficiency of TSP training and optimize the site of TSP to facilitate catheter manipulation in the ablation.
期刊介绍:
Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.