儿科重症监护室出院后的患者随访:范围综述。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nursing in Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1111/nicc.13187
Delphine Micaëlli, Jérôme Naudin, Stéphane Dauger, Michaël Levy, Sébastien Kerever
{"title":"儿科重症监护室出院后的患者随访:范围综述。","authors":"Delphine Micaëlli, Jérôme Naudin, Stéphane Dauger, Michaël Levy, Sébastien Kerever","doi":"10.1111/nicc.13187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive because of improvements in care. Many studies have identified the psychological, functional, cognitive and social impact of PICU admission on a child and their family. However, expert recommendations on follow-up are lacking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the strategies of clinical follow-up after PICU discharge performed from 2001 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This scoping review was undertaken between January and April 2021 using three databases: PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL. The search strategy consisted of a combination of keywords, including PICU, post-PICU discharge and follow-up in articles published between 2001 and 2021. The results are reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six-hundred and fifty-two articles were identified and 68 were analysed. Median age was 4.5 years and the two main reasons for PICU admission were cardiorespiratory failure and sepsis. Median length of PICU stay was 8 days. Most follow-up was carried out by research units (88%), while 6% of studies reported follow-up by a multidisciplinary PICU team. The most common follow-up schedule included an assessment at PICU discharge, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months. Follow-up for >1 year was reported in 20% of studies. One third of studies focused on follow-up quality of life and neurological outcomes. Parental emotional impact was assessed in 7% of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Follow-up after PICU discharge was highly heterogeneous regarding timing, health care professionals involved and assessment methods. There is an urgent need for standardization and coordination of PICU follow-up because of the increasing number of patients impacted by a PICU stay.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Although most patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive; they may develop paediatric post-intensive care syndrome (PICS-P). To our knowledge, there are currently no clinical guidelines regarding follow-up after PICU discharge. This review summarizes current approaches to follow-up after PICU discharge, including how it is carried out, who is involved and what the main aims of assessment are.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":"e13187"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090335/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient follow-up after discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit: A scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Delphine Micaëlli, Jérôme Naudin, Stéphane Dauger, Michaël Levy, Sébastien Kerever\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.13187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive because of improvements in care. Many studies have identified the psychological, functional, cognitive and social impact of PICU admission on a child and their family. However, expert recommendations on follow-up are lacking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify the strategies of clinical follow-up after PICU discharge performed from 2001 to 2021.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This scoping review was undertaken between January and April 2021 using three databases: PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL. The search strategy consisted of a combination of keywords, including PICU, post-PICU discharge and follow-up in articles published between 2001 and 2021. The results are reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six-hundred and fifty-two articles were identified and 68 were analysed. Median age was 4.5 years and the two main reasons for PICU admission were cardiorespiratory failure and sepsis. Median length of PICU stay was 8 days. Most follow-up was carried out by research units (88%), while 6% of studies reported follow-up by a multidisciplinary PICU team. The most common follow-up schedule included an assessment at PICU discharge, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months. Follow-up for >1 year was reported in 20% of studies. One third of studies focused on follow-up quality of life and neurological outcomes. Parental emotional impact was assessed in 7% of studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Follow-up after PICU discharge was highly heterogeneous regarding timing, health care professionals involved and assessment methods. There is an urgent need for standardization and coordination of PICU follow-up because of the increasing number of patients impacted by a PICU stay.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Although most patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive; they may develop paediatric post-intensive care syndrome (PICS-P). To our knowledge, there are currently no clinical guidelines regarding follow-up after PICU discharge. This review summarizes current approaches to follow-up after PICU discharge, including how it is carried out, who is involved and what the main aims of assessment are.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e13187\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12090335/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13187\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.13187","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于护理水平的提高,现在大多数入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿童都能存活下来。许多研究都指出了入住 PICU 对儿童及其家庭在心理、功能、认知和社会方面的影响。目的:确定2001年至2021年PICU出院后的临床随访策略:研究设计:本范围综述于 2021 年 1 月至 4 月间通过三个数据库进行:研究设计:本范围综述于 2021 年 1 月至 4 月期间进行,使用了三个数据库:PubMed、EMBASE 和 CINAHL。检索策略包括对 2001 年至 2021 年间发表的文章进行关键词组合,包括 PICU、PICU 出院后和随访。结果按照PRISMA-ScR指南进行报告:结果:共发现 652 篇文章,分析了 68 篇。中位年龄为4.5岁,入住PICU的两个主要原因是心肺功能衰竭和败血症。PICU 的中位住院时间为 8 天。大多数随访由研究单位进行(88%),6%的研究报告由PICU多学科团队进行随访。最常见的随访计划包括在 PICU 出院时进行评估,然后在 3 个月、6 个月和 12 个月时进行评估。有 20% 的研究报告随访时间超过 1 年。三分之一的研究侧重于随访生活质量和神经系统结果。7%的研究对家长的情绪影响进行了评估:结论:PICU 出院后的随访在时间安排、参与的医护人员和评估方法方面存在很大差异。由于受PICU住院影响的患者越来越多,因此迫切需要对PICU的随访进行标准化和协调:尽管现在大多数入住儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的患者都能存活下来,但他们可能会患上儿科重症监护后综合征(PICS-P)。据我们所知,目前还没有关于 PICU 出院后随访的临床指南。本综述总结了目前 PICU 出院后的随访方法,包括如何进行随访、由谁参与以及评估的主要目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient follow-up after discharge from the paediatric intensive care unit: A scoping review.

Background: Most children admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive because of improvements in care. Many studies have identified the psychological, functional, cognitive and social impact of PICU admission on a child and their family. However, expert recommendations on follow-up are lacking.

Aim: To identify the strategies of clinical follow-up after PICU discharge performed from 2001 to 2021.

Study design: This scoping review was undertaken between January and April 2021 using three databases: PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL. The search strategy consisted of a combination of keywords, including PICU, post-PICU discharge and follow-up in articles published between 2001 and 2021. The results are reported according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines.

Results: Six-hundred and fifty-two articles were identified and 68 were analysed. Median age was 4.5 years and the two main reasons for PICU admission were cardiorespiratory failure and sepsis. Median length of PICU stay was 8 days. Most follow-up was carried out by research units (88%), while 6% of studies reported follow-up by a multidisciplinary PICU team. The most common follow-up schedule included an assessment at PICU discharge, and then at 3, 6 and 12 months. Follow-up for >1 year was reported in 20% of studies. One third of studies focused on follow-up quality of life and neurological outcomes. Parental emotional impact was assessed in 7% of studies.

Conclusion: Follow-up after PICU discharge was highly heterogeneous regarding timing, health care professionals involved and assessment methods. There is an urgent need for standardization and coordination of PICU follow-up because of the increasing number of patients impacted by a PICU stay.

Relevance to clinical practice: Although most patients admitted to a paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) now survive; they may develop paediatric post-intensive care syndrome (PICS-P). To our knowledge, there are currently no clinical guidelines regarding follow-up after PICU discharge. This review summarizes current approaches to follow-up after PICU discharge, including how it is carried out, who is involved and what the main aims of assessment are.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信