{"title":"非小细胞肺癌袖状肺叶切除术后新辅助治疗的生存结果","authors":"Xiang Li, Qiuyuan Li, Fujun Yang, Erji Gao, Lei Lin, Yaqiang Li, Xuefei Hu, Xiao Song, Liang Duan","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing sleeve lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 613 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 who received neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:2 propensity score matching method was adopted to create a balanced cohort including 110 with neoadjuvant therapy and 169 without neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 73.6% vs 54.4%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; 80.9% vs 63.9%; P = .002) compared with patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved 3-year DFS (85.3% vs 54.4%; P = .001) and OS (88.2% vs 63.9%; P = .006), whereas chemotherapy alone did not show a significant effect. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed neoadjuvant therapy to be an independent predictor of improved DFS and OS, whereas pathologic N2 stage was independently associated with poorer DFS and OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in the neoadjuvant arm revealed that pathologic N2 stage is an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio, 3.830; 95% CI, 1.687-8.694; P = .001), and achieving major pathologic response is an independent predictor for better OS (hazard ratio, 0.120; 95% CI, 0.015-0.933; P = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy before sleeve lobectomy significantly increased DFS and OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Sleeve lobectomy is advisable after neoadjuvant therapy, especially following chemoimmunotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Sleeve Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Xiang Li, Qiuyuan Li, Fujun Yang, Erji Gao, Lei Lin, Yaqiang Li, Xuefei Hu, Xiao Song, Liang Duan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing sleeve lobectomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 613 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 who received neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:2 propensity score matching method was adopted to create a balanced cohort including 110 with neoadjuvant therapy and 169 without neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 73.6% vs 54.4%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; 80.9% vs 63.9%; P = .002) compared with patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved 3-year DFS (85.3% vs 54.4%; P = .001) and OS (88.2% vs 63.9%; P = .006), whereas chemotherapy alone did not show a significant effect. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed neoadjuvant therapy to be an independent predictor of improved DFS and OS, whereas pathologic N2 stage was independently associated with poorer DFS and OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in the neoadjuvant arm revealed that pathologic N2 stage is an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio, 3.830; 95% CI, 1.687-8.694; P = .001), and achieving major pathologic response is an independent predictor for better OS (hazard ratio, 0.120; 95% CI, 0.015-0.933; P = .043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant therapy before sleeve lobectomy significantly increased DFS and OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Sleeve lobectomy is advisable after neoadjuvant therapy, especially following chemoimmunotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.09.043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:本研究旨在评估新辅助治疗对接受袖状肺叶切除术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者长期生存的影响:本研究旨在评估新辅助治疗对接受袖状肺叶切除术的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者长期生存的影响:方法:共对613名患者进行了回顾性分析,其中包括124名接受新辅助治疗的患者。采用1:2倾向得分匹配法(PSM)建立了一个平衡队列,其中110人接受了新辅助治疗,169人未接受新辅助治疗。采用卡普兰-梅耶法估算生存率,并使用Log-rank检验和Cox比例危险模型进行比较:结果:新辅助治疗与3年DFS的改善有关(73.6% vs. 54.4%,PC结论:袖状肺叶切除术前的新辅助治疗可显著提高局部晚期NSCLC的DFS和OS。袖带肺叶切除术后最好进行新辅助治疗,尤其是化疗免疫治疗。
Survival Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by Sleeve Lobectomy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Background: This study was carried out to evaluate the impact of neoadjuvant therapy on long-term survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing sleeve lobectomy.
Methods: A total of 613 patients were retrospectively analyzed, including 124 who received neoadjuvant therapy. A 1:2 propensity score matching method was adopted to create a balanced cohort including 110 with neoadjuvant therapy and 169 without neoadjuvant therapy. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results: Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with improved 3-year disease-free survival (DFS; 73.6% vs 54.4%; P < .001) and overall survival (OS; 80.9% vs 63.9%; P = .002) compared with patients without neoadjuvant therapy. Moreover, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy significantly improved 3-year DFS (85.3% vs 54.4%; P = .001) and OS (88.2% vs 63.9%; P = .006), whereas chemotherapy alone did not show a significant effect. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed neoadjuvant therapy to be an independent predictor of improved DFS and OS, whereas pathologic N2 stage was independently associated with poorer DFS and OS. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in the neoadjuvant arm revealed that pathologic N2 stage is an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio, 3.830; 95% CI, 1.687-8.694; P = .001), and achieving major pathologic response is an independent predictor for better OS (hazard ratio, 0.120; 95% CI, 0.015-0.933; P = .043).
Conclusions: Neoadjuvant therapy before sleeve lobectomy significantly increased DFS and OS in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Sleeve lobectomy is advisable after neoadjuvant therapy, especially following chemoimmunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards.
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features:
• Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques
• New Technology articles
• Case reports
• "How-to-do-it" features
• Reviews of current literature
• Supplements on symposia
• Commentary pieces and correspondence
• CME
• Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery.
An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.