[SARS-CoV-2疫情对意大利五个大区(皮埃蒙特大区、艾米利亚-罗马涅大区、托斯卡纳大区、拉齐奥大区和西西里大区)城市化程度不同的移民人口的影响]。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Nicola Caranci, Valentina Adorno, Letizia Bartolini, Alice Corsaro, Teresa Spadea, Raffaella Rusciani, Chiara Di Girolamo, Laura Cacciani, Nera Agabiti, Francesco Profili, Caterina Milli, Caterina Silvestri, Achille Cernigliaro, Martina Ventura, Anteo Di Napoli, Alessio Petrelli, Paolo Giorgi Rossi
{"title":"[SARS-CoV-2疫情对意大利五个大区(皮埃蒙特大区、艾米利亚-罗马涅大区、托斯卡纳大区、拉齐奥大区和西西里大区)城市化程度不同的移民人口的影响]。","authors":"Nicola Caranci, Valentina Adorno, Letizia Bartolini, Alice Corsaro, Teresa Spadea, Raffaella Rusciani, Chiara Di Girolamo, Laura Cacciani, Nera Agabiti, Francesco Profili, Caterina Milli, Caterina Silvestri, Achille Cernigliaro, Martina Ventura, Anteo Di Napoli, Alessio Petrelli, Paolo Giorgi Rossi","doi":"10.19191/EP24.4-5.S1.113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>according to the literature, socially disadvantaged strata of the population, including immigrants, have been more vulnerable to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to greater exposure and less opportunity to protect themselves, and to COVID-19 complications due to metabolic and clinical risk factors as well as to healthcare access barriers. Two Italian projects - coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty and the Italian National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - set up an epidemiological surveillance to monitor the temporal trends of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in five Italian regions using validated indicators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify differences between Italians and immigrants in terms of the epidemic evolution and its health consequences, and to investigate possible differences by urbanisation degree and region of residence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>resident population in five Italian regions: Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>frequencies of positive tests, routine hospitalisations, and deaths related to COVID-19 were collected, with respect to the period between 22.02.2020 and 31.01.2021. Data were aggregated by week, region, degree of urbanisation, gender, age (5-year classes), and citizenship (Italian/foreigner). Crude and standardised rates of the outcomes considered were calculated, stratified by gender, citizenship, region, and aggregated by pandemic macro-period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the study population counts approximately about 23 million residents as of 01.01.2020 (9.4% immigrants). During the period of interest, 1,542,458 cases of infection were recorded, whereas hospitalisations amounted to 175,979, and deaths to 44,867. Lower crude rates of hospitalisations and deaths were observed among immigrants compared to Italians. The age-standardised hospitalisation rates, on the other hand, showed an opposite trend and were significantly higher among immigrants, due to the excess observed in urban areas, especially in periods of epidemic peak, both for males (weekly mean standardised rate: 34.6 per 1,000 of foreign residents vs 24.3 of Italians over the period October 2020-January 2021) and females (23.2 vs 15.1 over the period February-April 2021). These differences seem to be more pronounced in the central regions and tend to disappear for residents in scarcely populated areas. Standardised mortality rates were higher among immigrants, both men and women, from October 2020 and more markedly in February-April 2021 among men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the impact of COVID-19 was stronger among immigrants in relation to hospitalisation, especially during epidemic peak periods and in some regions. The difference in the impact on mortality was smaller. There is some heterogeneity among regions and urban areas that is worth considering in the planning of interventions and integration policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50511,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiologia & Prevenzione","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic on the immigrant population by urbanisation degree in five Italian Regions (Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily)].\",\"authors\":\"Nicola Caranci, Valentina Adorno, Letizia Bartolini, Alice Corsaro, Teresa Spadea, Raffaella Rusciani, Chiara Di Girolamo, Laura Cacciani, Nera Agabiti, Francesco Profili, Caterina Milli, Caterina Silvestri, Achille Cernigliaro, Martina Ventura, Anteo Di Napoli, Alessio Petrelli, Paolo Giorgi Rossi\",\"doi\":\"10.19191/EP24.4-5.S1.113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>according to the literature, socially disadvantaged strata of the population, including immigrants, have been more vulnerable to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to greater exposure and less opportunity to protect themselves, and to COVID-19 complications due to metabolic and clinical risk factors as well as to healthcare access barriers. Two Italian projects - coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty and the Italian National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - set up an epidemiological surveillance to monitor the temporal trends of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in five Italian regions using validated indicators.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to identify differences between Italians and immigrants in terms of the epidemic evolution and its health consequences, and to investigate possible differences by urbanisation degree and region of residence.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>cross sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>resident population in five Italian regions: Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes measures: </strong>frequencies of positive tests, routine hospitalisations, and deaths related to COVID-19 were collected, with respect to the period between 22.02.2020 and 31.01.2021. Data were aggregated by week, region, degree of urbanisation, gender, age (5-year classes), and citizenship (Italian/foreigner). Crude and standardised rates of the outcomes considered were calculated, stratified by gender, citizenship, region, and aggregated by pandemic macro-period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>the study population counts approximately about 23 million residents as of 01.01.2020 (9.4% immigrants). During the period of interest, 1,542,458 cases of infection were recorded, whereas hospitalisations amounted to 175,979, and deaths to 44,867. Lower crude rates of hospitalisations and deaths were observed among immigrants compared to Italians. The age-standardised hospitalisation rates, on the other hand, showed an opposite trend and were significantly higher among immigrants, due to the excess observed in urban areas, especially in periods of epidemic peak, both for males (weekly mean standardised rate: 34.6 per 1,000 of foreign residents vs 24.3 of Italians over the period October 2020-January 2021) and females (23.2 vs 15.1 over the period February-April 2021). These differences seem to be more pronounced in the central regions and tend to disappear for residents in scarcely populated areas. Standardised mortality rates were higher among immigrants, both men and women, from October 2020 and more markedly in February-April 2021 among men.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>the impact of COVID-19 was stronger among immigrants in relation to hospitalisation, especially during epidemic peak periods and in some regions. The difference in the impact on mortality was smaller. There is some heterogeneity among regions and urban areas that is worth considering in the planning of interventions and integration policies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50511,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epidemiologia & Prevenzione\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epidemiologia & Prevenzione\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19191/EP24.4-5.S1.113\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiologia & Prevenzione","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19191/EP24.4-5.S1.113","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:根据文献记载,包括移民在内的社会弱势群体由于接触的机会较多和自我保护的机会较少,更容易受到 SARS-CoV-2 感染的威胁,并且由于代谢和临床风险因素以及医疗保健方面的障碍,更容易出现 COVID-19 并发症。意大利的两个项目--由意大利国家健康、移民和贫困研究所和意大利国家疾病预防和控制中心协调--建立了流行病学监测,利用有效指标监测意大利五个地区 SARS-CoV-2 大流行的时间趋势。目标:确定意大利人和移民在流行病演变及其健康后果方面的差异,并调查城市化程度和居住地区可能存在的差异:主要结果测量:收集 2020 年 2 月 22 日至 2021 年 1 月 31 日期间与 COVID-19 相关的阳性检测、常规住院和死亡频率。数据按周、地区、城市化程度、性别、年龄(5 岁班)和国籍(意大利人/外国人)汇总。结果:截至 2020 年 1 月 1 日,研究人口中约有 2,300 万居民(9.4% 为移民)。在研究期间,共记录了 1,542,458 例感染病例,住院人数为 175,979 人,死亡人数为 44,867 人。与意大利人相比,移民的住院率和死亡率都较低。另一方面,年龄标准化的住院率却呈现出相反的趋势,移民的住院率明显更高,这是因为在城市地区,尤其是在流行病高峰期,男性的住院率更高,(每周平均标准化住院率为每千人中 34.6 例,男性为每千人中 34.6 例,女性为每千人中 34.6 例):在 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 1 月期间,外国居民的每周平均标准化发病率为 34.6‰,而意大利人为 24.3‰),女性的发病率为 23.2‰,而 2021 年 2 月至 4 月期间为 15.1‰。这些差异似乎在中部地区更为明显,而在人口稀少地区则趋于消失。结论:COVID-19 对移民住院率的影响更大,尤其是在流行病高峰期和某些地区。对死亡率的影响差异较小。地区和城市之间存在一些异质性,值得在规划干预措施和融合政策时加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Impact of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic on the immigrant population by urbanisation degree in five Italian Regions (Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily)].

Background: according to the literature, socially disadvantaged strata of the population, including immigrants, have been more vulnerable to the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection due to greater exposure and less opportunity to protect themselves, and to COVID-19 complications due to metabolic and clinical risk factors as well as to healthcare access barriers. Two Italian projects - coordinated by the Italian National Institute for Health, Migration and Poverty and the Italian National Centre for Disease Prevention and Control - set up an epidemiological surveillance to monitor the temporal trends of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in five Italian regions using validated indicators.

Objectives: to identify differences between Italians and immigrants in terms of the epidemic evolution and its health consequences, and to investigate possible differences by urbanisation degree and region of residence.

Design: cross sectional study.

Setting and participants: resident population in five Italian regions: Piedmont, Emilia-Romagna, Tuscany, Lazio, and Sicily.

Main outcomes measures: frequencies of positive tests, routine hospitalisations, and deaths related to COVID-19 were collected, with respect to the period between 22.02.2020 and 31.01.2021. Data were aggregated by week, region, degree of urbanisation, gender, age (5-year classes), and citizenship (Italian/foreigner). Crude and standardised rates of the outcomes considered were calculated, stratified by gender, citizenship, region, and aggregated by pandemic macro-period.

Results: the study population counts approximately about 23 million residents as of 01.01.2020 (9.4% immigrants). During the period of interest, 1,542,458 cases of infection were recorded, whereas hospitalisations amounted to 175,979, and deaths to 44,867. Lower crude rates of hospitalisations and deaths were observed among immigrants compared to Italians. The age-standardised hospitalisation rates, on the other hand, showed an opposite trend and were significantly higher among immigrants, due to the excess observed in urban areas, especially in periods of epidemic peak, both for males (weekly mean standardised rate: 34.6 per 1,000 of foreign residents vs 24.3 of Italians over the period October 2020-January 2021) and females (23.2 vs 15.1 over the period February-April 2021). These differences seem to be more pronounced in the central regions and tend to disappear for residents in scarcely populated areas. Standardised mortality rates were higher among immigrants, both men and women, from October 2020 and more markedly in February-April 2021 among men.

Conclusions: the impact of COVID-19 was stronger among immigrants in relation to hospitalisation, especially during epidemic peak periods and in some regions. The difference in the impact on mortality was smaller. There is some heterogeneity among regions and urban areas that is worth considering in the planning of interventions and integration policies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Epidemiologia & Prevenzione
Epidemiologia & Prevenzione 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Epidemiologia & Prevenzione, oggi organo della Associazione italiana di epidemiologia, raccoglie buona parte delle migliori e originali esperienze italiane di ricerca epidemiologica e di studio degli interventi per la prevenzione e la sanità pubblica. La rivista – indicizzata su Medline e dotata di Impact Factor – è un canale importante anche per la segnalazione al pubblico internazionale di contributi che altrimenti circolerebbero soltanto in Italia. E&P in questi decenni ha svolto una funzione di riferimento per la sanità pubblica ma anche per i cittadini e le loro diverse forme di aggregazione. Il principio che l’ha ispirata era, e rimane, che l’epidemiologia ha senso se è funzionale alla prevenzione e alla sanità pubblica e che la prevenzione ha ben poche possibilità di realizzarsi se non si fonda su valide basi scientifiche e se non c’è la partecipazione di tutti i soggetti interessati. Modalità di comunicazione aggiornate, metodologia statistica ed epidemiologica rigorosa, validità degli studi e solidità delle interpretazioni dei risultati sono la solida matrice su cui E&P è costruita. A questa si accompagna una forte responsabilità etica verso la salute pubblica, che oggi ha ampliato in forma irreversibile il suo orizzonte, e include in forma sempre più consapevole non solo gli esseri umani, ma l’intero pianeta e le modificazioni che l’uomo apporta all’universo in cui vive. L’ambizione è che l’offerta di nuovi strumenti di comunicazione, informazione e formazione, soprattutto attraverso l''uso di internet, renda la rivista non solo un tradizionale veicolo di contenuti e analisi scientifiche, ma anche un potente strumento a disposizione di una comunità di interessi e di valori che ha a cuore la salute pubblica.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信