Yang Zhao, Li Yan, Ruichen Li, Xiaoshen Wang, Yi Zhu
{"title":"选择性颈部照射在雌性神经母细胞瘤治疗中的价值:基于倾向评分匹配的回顾性研究。","authors":"Yang Zhao, Li Yan, Ruichen Li, Xiaoshen Wang, Yi Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s13014-024-02539-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of elective neck irradiation (ENI) in patients with esthesineuroblastoma (ENB), a rare malignant neoplasm, who are clinically node-negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 178 patients newly diagnosed with ENB at our institution between 2009 and 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare node-negative patients treated with and without ENI. We extensively examined survival outcomes and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 178 participants, 149 (83.7%) were lymph node-negative and staged in Modified Kadish A-C. 96 patients underwent ENI treatment, while 53 did not. At baseline, patients who received ENI differed from those who did not in terms of radiotherapy technique, staging, orbital invasion, surgical mode, and chemotherapy. After PSM, 43 pairs were available for analysis. ENI was observed to extend overall survival (OS, 5-year 73.9% vs. 84.0%; 3-year 76.9% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.022), progression-free survival (PFS, 5-year 38.5% vs. 84.6%; 3-year 50.5% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS, 5-year 42.7% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.023; 3-year 57.3% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) in node-negative ENI patients. Failure pattern analyses revealed that ENI, which included level Ib, II, VIIa, significantly reduced the treatment failure rate. Furthermore, ENI did not significantly impact the prognosis of T1-2 patients, indicating potential clinical value of ENI in T3-4 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that ENI decreased regional failure and significantly enhanced LRFS and PFS. ENI may be considered as an integral part of the initial treatment strategy for locally advanced node-negative ENB patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The value of elective neck irradiation in management of esthesioneuroblastoma: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching.\",\"authors\":\"Yang Zhao, Li Yan, Ruichen Li, Xiaoshen Wang, Yi Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13014-024-02539-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of elective neck irradiation (ENI) in patients with esthesineuroblastoma (ENB), a rare malignant neoplasm, who are clinically node-negative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 178 patients newly diagnosed with ENB at our institution between 2009 and 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare node-negative patients treated with and without ENI. We extensively examined survival outcomes and treatment failure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 178 participants, 149 (83.7%) were lymph node-negative and staged in Modified Kadish A-C. 96 patients underwent ENI treatment, while 53 did not. At baseline, patients who received ENI differed from those who did not in terms of radiotherapy technique, staging, orbital invasion, surgical mode, and chemotherapy. After PSM, 43 pairs were available for analysis. ENI was observed to extend overall survival (OS, 5-year 73.9% vs. 84.0%; 3-year 76.9% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.022), progression-free survival (PFS, 5-year 38.5% vs. 84.6%; 3-year 50.5% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS, 5-year 42.7% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.023; 3-year 57.3% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) in node-negative ENI patients. Failure pattern analyses revealed that ENI, which included level Ib, II, VIIa, significantly reduced the treatment failure rate. Furthermore, ENI did not significantly impact the prognosis of T1-2 patients, indicating potential clinical value of ENI in T3-4 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that ENI decreased regional failure and significantly enhanced LRFS and PFS. ENI may be considered as an integral part of the initial treatment strategy for locally advanced node-negative ENB patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494863/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02539-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-024-02539-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究背景本研究旨在评估选择性颈部照射(ENI)对临床结节阴性的雌神经母细胞瘤(ENB)患者的临床疗效:我们对本机构在2009年至2021年间新确诊的178例ENB患者进行了回顾性分析。我们采用倾向评分匹配法(PSM)对接受和未接受ENI治疗的结节阴性患者进行了比较。我们广泛研究了生存结果和治疗失败情况:在178名参与者中,149人(83.7%)为淋巴结阴性,分期为改良卡迪什A-C期。96名患者接受了ENI治疗,53名患者未接受治疗。基线时,接受 ENI 治疗的患者与未接受 ENI 治疗的患者在放疗技术、分期、眼眶侵犯、手术方式和化疗方面存在差异。经过PSM后,有43对患者可供分析。观察到ENI延长了总生存期(OS,5年73.9%对84.0%;3年76.9%对97.1%,P = 0.022)和无进展生存期(PFS,5年38.5%对84.6%;3年50.5%对94.5%,P 结论:我们的研究结果表明,ENI可减少区域性失败,并显著提高LRFS和PFS。ENI可被视为局部晚期结节阴性ENB患者初始治疗策略中不可或缺的一部分。
The value of elective neck irradiation in management of esthesioneuroblastoma: a retrospective study based on propensity score matching.
Background: This study aims to assess the clinical efficacy of elective neck irradiation (ENI) in patients with esthesineuroblastoma (ENB), a rare malignant neoplasm, who are clinically node-negative.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 178 patients newly diagnosed with ENB at our institution between 2009 and 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to compare node-negative patients treated with and without ENI. We extensively examined survival outcomes and treatment failure.
Results: Of the 178 participants, 149 (83.7%) were lymph node-negative and staged in Modified Kadish A-C. 96 patients underwent ENI treatment, while 53 did not. At baseline, patients who received ENI differed from those who did not in terms of radiotherapy technique, staging, orbital invasion, surgical mode, and chemotherapy. After PSM, 43 pairs were available for analysis. ENI was observed to extend overall survival (OS, 5-year 73.9% vs. 84.0%; 3-year 76.9% vs. 97.1%, p = 0.022), progression-free survival (PFS, 5-year 38.5% vs. 84.6%; 3-year 50.5% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS, 5-year 42.7% vs. 84.6%, p = 0.023; 3-year 57.3% vs. 94.5%, p < 0.001) in node-negative ENI patients. Failure pattern analyses revealed that ENI, which included level Ib, II, VIIa, significantly reduced the treatment failure rate. Furthermore, ENI did not significantly impact the prognosis of T1-2 patients, indicating potential clinical value of ENI in T3-4 patients.
Conclusions: Our findings suggested that ENI decreased regional failure and significantly enhanced LRFS and PFS. ENI may be considered as an integral part of the initial treatment strategy for locally advanced node-negative ENB patients.
Radiation OncologyONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍:
Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.