内窥镜单人胆道镜检查的可行性、安全性和有效性:一项回顾性单中心研究。

IF 4.3 3区 材料科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
ACS Applied Electronic Materials Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17562848241288111
Karsten Büringer, Ulrike Schempf, Stefano Fusco, Dörte Wichmann, Dietmar Stüker, Martin Götz, Nisar P Malek, Christoph R Werner
{"title":"内窥镜单人胆道镜检查的可行性、安全性和有效性:一项回顾性单中心研究。","authors":"Karsten Büringer, Ulrike Schempf, Stefano Fusco, Dörte Wichmann, Dietmar Stüker, Martin Götz, Nisar P Malek, Christoph R Werner","doi":"10.1177/17562848241288111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is the standard endoscopic procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the pancreas and bile ducts. Cholangioscopy provides direct visualization of the bile ducts. It offers the possibility of more detailed diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Today, cholangioscopy is often performed as a single-operator (SOC) procedure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We were interested in the clinical efficacy of our SOC procedure in comparison with published studies, and performed this retrospective data analysis of all our consecutive patients from 2016 to 2022 to analyze the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SOC.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing SOC at a tertiary center from 2016 to 2022 (<i>N</i> = 196) was performed. Demographic data, indication for SOC, exam-specific data, efficacy, and complications were included. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common indications for SOC were indeterminate biliary strictures (<i>n</i> = 117; 60%), treatment of biliary stones (<i>n</i> = 45; 23%), and other indications (<i>n</i> = 34; 17%), for example, foreign body removal or intraoperative SOC. In 97% of the SOC (<i>n</i> = 191), the procedure was technically successful. The diagnostic or therapeutic goal was achieved in 91% of SOC (<i>n</i> = 173). In the subgroup where the SOC result was confirmed by subsequent surgery (<i>n</i> = 93), sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, and SOC treatment of stones was successful in 89%. Complications occurred in (20%; <i>n</i> = 37). The majority of these patients (<i>n</i> = 18; 10%) had minor bleeding requiring no intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SOC is an effective and safe procedure that should be the standard of care when primary diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP has failed. The sensitivity and specificity for determining the dignity of biliary strictures and the efficacy for the treatment of difficult-to-treat stones are reproducibly very high.</p>","PeriodicalId":3,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487541/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic single-operator cholangioscopy: a retrospective single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Karsten Büringer, Ulrike Schempf, Stefano Fusco, Dörte Wichmann, Dietmar Stüker, Martin Götz, Nisar P Malek, Christoph R Werner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17562848241288111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is the standard endoscopic procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the pancreas and bile ducts. Cholangioscopy provides direct visualization of the bile ducts. It offers the possibility of more detailed diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Today, cholangioscopy is often performed as a single-operator (SOC) procedure.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We were interested in the clinical efficacy of our SOC procedure in comparison with published studies, and performed this retrospective data analysis of all our consecutive patients from 2016 to 2022 to analyze the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SOC.</p><p><strong>Design and methods: </strong>A retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing SOC at a tertiary center from 2016 to 2022 (<i>N</i> = 196) was performed. Demographic data, indication for SOC, exam-specific data, efficacy, and complications were included. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common indications for SOC were indeterminate biliary strictures (<i>n</i> = 117; 60%), treatment of biliary stones (<i>n</i> = 45; 23%), and other indications (<i>n</i> = 34; 17%), for example, foreign body removal or intraoperative SOC. In 97% of the SOC (<i>n</i> = 191), the procedure was technically successful. The diagnostic or therapeutic goal was achieved in 91% of SOC (<i>n</i> = 173). In the subgroup where the SOC result was confirmed by subsequent surgery (<i>n</i> = 93), sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, and SOC treatment of stones was successful in 89%. Complications occurred in (20%; <i>n</i> = 37). The majority of these patients (<i>n</i> = 18; 10%) had minor bleeding requiring no intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SOC is an effective and safe procedure that should be the standard of care when primary diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP has failed. The sensitivity and specificity for determining the dignity of biliary strictures and the efficacy for the treatment of difficult-to-treat stones are reproducibly very high.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":3,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487541/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Electronic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241288111\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Electronic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17562848241288111","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)是诊断和治疗胰腺和胆管疾病的标准内镜手术。胆道镜可直接观察胆管。它可以提供更详细的诊断和治疗指征。如今,胆道镜检查通常作为单人手术(SOC)进行:我们对我们的 SOC 手术与已发表研究的临床疗效进行了比较,并对我们从 2016 年到 2022 年的所有连续患者进行了此次回顾性数据分析,以分析 SOC 的可行性、安全性和疗效:对2016年至2022年在一家三级中心接受SOC手术的患者(N = 196)进行了单中心回顾性分析。研究纳入了人口统计学数据、SOC 适应症、特定检查数据、疗效和并发症。计算了诊断不确定胆道狭窄的敏感性和特异性:SOC最常见的适应症是不确定的胆道狭窄(n = 117;60%)、胆道结石治疗(n = 45;23%)和其他适应症(n = 34;17%),例如异物取出或术中SOC。97%的 SOC(n = 191)手术在技术上是成功的。91%的 SOC(173 人)达到了诊断或治疗目标。在通过后续手术确认 SOC 结果的亚组(n = 93)中,敏感性为 86%,特异性为 99%,89% 的结石 SOC 治疗成功。并发症发生率为(20%;n = 37)。这些患者中的大多数(18 人;10%)有轻微出血,无需干预:SOC是一种有效、安全的手术,应作为ERCP初诊和/或治疗失败后的标准治疗方法。确定胆道狭窄的敏感性和特异性以及治疗难治结石的疗效都非常高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic single-operator cholangioscopy: a retrospective single-center study.

Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) is the standard endoscopic procedure for the diagnosis and treatment of diseases of the pancreas and bile ducts. Cholangioscopy provides direct visualization of the bile ducts. It offers the possibility of more detailed diagnostic and therapeutic indications. Today, cholangioscopy is often performed as a single-operator (SOC) procedure.

Objectives: We were interested in the clinical efficacy of our SOC procedure in comparison with published studies, and performed this retrospective data analysis of all our consecutive patients from 2016 to 2022 to analyze the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of SOC.

Design and methods: A retrospective single-center analysis of patients undergoing SOC at a tertiary center from 2016 to 2022 (N = 196) was performed. Demographic data, indication for SOC, exam-specific data, efficacy, and complications were included. Sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures were calculated.

Results: The most common indications for SOC were indeterminate biliary strictures (n = 117; 60%), treatment of biliary stones (n = 45; 23%), and other indications (n = 34; 17%), for example, foreign body removal or intraoperative SOC. In 97% of the SOC (n = 191), the procedure was technically successful. The diagnostic or therapeutic goal was achieved in 91% of SOC (n = 173). In the subgroup where the SOC result was confirmed by subsequent surgery (n = 93), sensitivity was 86%, specificity 99%, and SOC treatment of stones was successful in 89%. Complications occurred in (20%; n = 37). The majority of these patients (n = 18; 10%) had minor bleeding requiring no intervention.

Conclusion: SOC is an effective and safe procedure that should be the standard of care when primary diagnostic and/or therapeutic ERCP has failed. The sensitivity and specificity for determining the dignity of biliary strictures and the efficacy for the treatment of difficult-to-treat stones are reproducibly very high.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
567
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信