Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari
{"title":"一项定性研究,探讨心理健康专业人员对服务使用者权利状况的观点、看法和态度。","authors":"Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: <i>'Transforming the therapeutic relationship'</i> and <i>'Societal determinants of service users' rights'</i>. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: '<i>Diversifying mental health knowledge'</i>, <i>'Risk-protection tensions'</i>, and <i>'Being (ir)responsible'.</i> Within the latter meta-theme we identified <i>'Determinants inside the clinics'</i> and <i>'Determinants outside the clinics.'</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative study exploring mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ipm.2024.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: <i>'Transforming the therapeutic relationship'</i> and <i>'Societal determinants of service users' rights'</i>. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: '<i>Diversifying mental health knowledge'</i>, <i>'Risk-protection tensions'</i>, and <i>'Being (ir)responsible'.</i> Within the latter meta-theme we identified <i>'Determinants inside the clinics'</i> and <i>'Determinants outside the clinics.'</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A qualitative study exploring mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.
Background: The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.
Methods: We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.
Results: Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: 'Transforming the therapeutic relationship' and 'Societal determinants of service users' rights'. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: 'Diversifying mental health knowledge', 'Risk-protection tensions', and 'Being (ir)responsible'. Within the latter meta-theme we identified 'Determinants inside the clinics' and 'Determinants outside the clinics.'
Conclusions: Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.