一项定性研究,探讨心理健康专业人员对服务使用者权利状况的观点、看法和态度。

IF 1.8 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari
{"title":"一项定性研究,探讨心理健康专业人员对服务使用者权利状况的观点、看法和态度。","authors":"Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari","doi":"10.1017/ipm.2024.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: <i>'Transforming the therapeutic relationship'</i> and <i>'Societal determinants of service users' rights'</i>. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: '<i>Diversifying mental health knowledge'</i>, <i>'Risk-protection tensions'</i>, and <i>'Being (ir)responsible'.</i> Within the latter meta-theme we identified <i>'Determinants inside the clinics'</i> and <i>'Determinants outside the clinics.'</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.</p>","PeriodicalId":46220,"journal":{"name":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A qualitative study exploring mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.\",\"authors\":\"Francisco José Eiroa-Orosa, Cristina Pradillo-Caimari\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ipm.2024.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: <i>'Transforming the therapeutic relationship'</i> and <i>'Societal determinants of service users' rights'</i>. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: '<i>Diversifying mental health knowledge'</i>, <i>'Risk-protection tensions'</i>, and <i>'Being (ir)responsible'.</i> Within the latter meta-theme we identified <i>'Determinants inside the clinics'</i> and <i>'Determinants outside the clinics.'</i></p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipm.2024.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心理健康服务使用者的权利是一个备受争议的话题。本文旨在研究精神卫生专业人员对服务使用者权利状况的观点、看法和态度:方法:我们对涉及精神卫生专业人员的 11 个焦点小组进行了专题分析:通过这一过程,我们发现了两个主要的元主题,它们揭示了心理健康服务使用者所面临的挑战:"治疗关系的转变 "和 "服务使用者权利的社会决定因素"。在前一个元主题中,我们确定了以下主题:"心理健康知识多样化"、"风险-保护紧张关系 "和"(不)负责任"。在后一个元主题中,我们确定了 "诊所内的决定因素 "和 "诊所外的决定因素":对这些主题的反思有可能鼓励采取新的策略,支持专业人员克服阻碍他们坚持以权利为本的精神健康护理模式的主观障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A qualitative study exploring mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.

Background: The rights of mental health service users are a subject of profound debate. In this article, we aim to examine mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights.

Methods: We conducted a thematic analysis of eleven focus groups involving mental health professionals.

Results: Through this process, we identified two main meta-themes that shed light on the challenges faced by mental health service users: 'Transforming the therapeutic relationship' and 'Societal determinants of service users' rights'. Within the former meta-theme, we identified the following themes: 'Diversifying mental health knowledge', 'Risk-protection tensions', and 'Being (ir)responsible'. Within the latter meta-theme we identified 'Determinants inside the clinics' and 'Determinants outside the clinics.'

Conclusions: Reflecting on these themes could potentially encourage new strategies to support professionals in overcoming the subjective barriers that prevent their adherence to rights-based mental health care models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
3.90%
发文量
51
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信