Avrey A Novak, Joseph T Patterson, Michael F Githens, Reza Firoozabadi, Conor P Kleweno
{"title":"65 岁以上患者的骶骨 U 型骨折。","authors":"Avrey A Novak, Joseph T Patterson, Michael F Githens, Reza Firoozabadi, Conor P Kleweno","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of disability that geriatric patients with sacral U-type fractures experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 65 years presenting from 2013 to 2019 with a U-type sacral fracture were included. Patient demographics, treatment type, preinjury domicile, preinjury use of assistive devices, and neurologic deficits were recorded. Outcomes included mortality, return to preinjury domicile, and use of assistive devices for mobility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients in the treatment period, ground-level fall was the most common mechanism of injury (60.8%). Thirty-four patients (74%) were treated surgically, most commonly with closed percutaneous fixation (n = 27). Thirteen percent of patients died during the admission. At the final follow-up, 14 (45%) had not returned to their prior domicile and 18 (58%) required more supportive assistive devices. Seventy-three percent of patients who presented delayed required a new gait aid, compared with 47% presenting acutely. Between those presenting with low-energy versus high-energy mechanisms, similar rates of need were observed for new assistive devices (50% low and 73% high) and lack of return to preinjury domicile (40% low, 50% high).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many geriatric patients were disabled by or died after sustaining a sacral U-type fracture, highlighting the morbidity regardless of high-energy or low-energy trauma.</p>","PeriodicalId":45062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495793/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sacral U-type Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 years.\",\"authors\":\"Avrey A Novak, Joseph T Patterson, Michael F Githens, Reza Firoozabadi, Conor P Kleweno\",\"doi\":\"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of disability that geriatric patients with sacral U-type fractures experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients older than 65 years presenting from 2013 to 2019 with a U-type sacral fracture were included. Patient demographics, treatment type, preinjury domicile, preinjury use of assistive devices, and neurologic deficits were recorded. Outcomes included mortality, return to preinjury domicile, and use of assistive devices for mobility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 46 patients in the treatment period, ground-level fall was the most common mechanism of injury (60.8%). Thirty-four patients (74%) were treated surgically, most commonly with closed percutaneous fixation (n = 27). Thirteen percent of patients died during the admission. At the final follow-up, 14 (45%) had not returned to their prior domicile and 18 (58%) required more supportive assistive devices. Seventy-three percent of patients who presented delayed required a new gait aid, compared with 47% presenting acutely. Between those presenting with low-energy versus high-energy mechanisms, similar rates of need were observed for new assistive devices (50% low and 73% high) and lack of return to preinjury domicile (40% low, 50% high).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Many geriatric patients were disabled by or died after sustaining a sacral U-type fracture, highlighting the morbidity regardless of high-energy or low-energy trauma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11495793/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Global Research and Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-24-00030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sacral U-type Fractures in Patients Older Than 65 years.
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of disability that geriatric patients with sacral U-type fractures experience.
Methods: Patients older than 65 years presenting from 2013 to 2019 with a U-type sacral fracture were included. Patient demographics, treatment type, preinjury domicile, preinjury use of assistive devices, and neurologic deficits were recorded. Outcomes included mortality, return to preinjury domicile, and use of assistive devices for mobility.
Results: Among 46 patients in the treatment period, ground-level fall was the most common mechanism of injury (60.8%). Thirty-four patients (74%) were treated surgically, most commonly with closed percutaneous fixation (n = 27). Thirteen percent of patients died during the admission. At the final follow-up, 14 (45%) had not returned to their prior domicile and 18 (58%) required more supportive assistive devices. Seventy-three percent of patients who presented delayed required a new gait aid, compared with 47% presenting acutely. Between those presenting with low-energy versus high-energy mechanisms, similar rates of need were observed for new assistive devices (50% low and 73% high) and lack of return to preinjury domicile (40% low, 50% high).
Discussion: Many geriatric patients were disabled by or died after sustaining a sacral U-type fracture, highlighting the morbidity regardless of high-energy or low-energy trauma.