膝关节风湿畸形:骨关节炎患者和健康人群的患病率和预测因素。

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Joss Moore, Victor A van de Graaf, Jil A Wood, Peter Humburg, William Colyn, Johan Bellemans, Darren B Chen, Samuel J MacDessi
{"title":"膝关节风湿畸形:骨关节炎患者和健康人群的患病率和预测因素。","authors":"Joss Moore, Victor A van de Graaf, Jil A Wood, Peter Humburg, William Colyn, Johan Bellemans, Darren B Chen, Samuel J MacDessi","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WSD was more prevalent in the OA group compared to the healthy group (7.9% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001, relative risk (RR) 19.8). There was a significant difference in means and variance between the mHKA of the healthy and OA groups (mean -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs mean -3.8°(SD 6.6°) respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences existed in MPTA and LDFA between the groups, with a minimal difference in aHKA (mean -0.9° healthy vs -0.5° OA; p < 0.001). Backwards logistic regression identified meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy as predictors of WSD (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 10.0), p = 0.002; OR 11.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 89.3); p = 0.016; OR 41.6 (95% CI 5.4 to 432.9), p ≤ 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a 20-fold greater prevalence of WSD in OA populations. The development of WSD is associated with meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy. These findings support WSD being mostly an acquired condition following skeletal maturity.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 10","pages":"879-885"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472183/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Windswept deformity of the knee: prevalence and predictive factors in osteoarthritic and healthy populations.\",\"authors\":\"Joss Moore, Victor A van de Graaf, Jil A Wood, Peter Humburg, William Colyn, Johan Bellemans, Darren B Chen, Samuel J MacDessi\",\"doi\":\"10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WSD was more prevalent in the OA group compared to the healthy group (7.9% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001, relative risk (RR) 19.8). There was a significant difference in means and variance between the mHKA of the healthy and OA groups (mean -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs mean -3.8°(SD 6.6°) respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences existed in MPTA and LDFA between the groups, with a minimal difference in aHKA (mean -0.9° healthy vs -0.5° OA; p < 0.001). Backwards logistic regression identified meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy as predictors of WSD (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 10.0), p = 0.002; OR 11.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 89.3); p = 0.016; OR 41.6 (95% CI 5.4 to 432.9), p ≤ 0.001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a 20-fold greater prevalence of WSD in OA populations. The development of WSD is associated with meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy. These findings support WSD being mostly an acquired condition following skeletal maturity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"volume\":\"5 10\",\"pages\":\"879-885\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11472183/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bone & Joint Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究对膝关节风卷畸形(WSD)进行了研究,比较了健康人群和骨关节炎(OA)人群的患病率和诱因:我们进行了一项病例对照放射学研究,将 500 个健康膝关节(250 名成人)与 710 个接受双侧全膝关节置换术的 OA 膝关节(355 名成人)进行了连续抽样比较。研究人员测定了每个膝关节的机械髋-膝-踝角度(mHKA)、胫骨内侧近端角度(MPTA)和股骨外侧远端角度(LDFA),并计算了算术髋-膝-踝角度(aHKA)、关节线偏斜度和膝关节冠状面对齐度(CPAK)类型。WSD 的定义是:一侧肢体的 mHKA 曲度小于 -2°,对侧肢体的 mHKA 外翻大于 2°。主要结果是健康组和 OA 组之间 WSD 发生率的比例差异。次要结果是宪法规定的CPAK变位和外翻类型之间WSD发生率的比例差异,并探讨OA组中预定义变量与WSD之间的关联:结果:与健康组相比,OA 组的 WSD 发生率更高(7.9% vs 0.4%;P < 0.001,相对风险 (RR) 19.8)。健康组和 OA 组的 mHKA 平均值和方差有明显差异(分别为平均 -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs 平均 -3.8° (SD 6.6°);P < 0.001)。两组之间的 MPTA 和 LDFA 没有明显差异,而 aHKA 的差异很小(健康组平均 -0.9° 对 OA 组平均 -0.5°;P < 0.001)。反向逻辑回归发现,半月板切除术、类风湿性关节炎和截骨术是WSD的预测因素(几率比(OR)分别为4.1(95% CI 1.7至10.0),p = 0.002;OR 11.9(95% CI 1.3至89.3);p = 0.016;OR 41.6(95% CI 5.4至432.9),p ≤ 0.001):本研究发现,OA人群中WSD的发病率高出20倍。WSD的发生与半月板切除术、类风湿性关节炎和截骨术有关。这些研究结果表明,WSD主要是骨骼发育成熟后获得性疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Windswept deformity of the knee: prevalence and predictive factors in osteoarthritic and healthy populations.

Aims: This study examined windswept deformity (WSD) of the knee, comparing prevalence and contributing factors in healthy and osteoarthritic (OA) cohorts.

Methods: A case-control radiological study was undertaken comparing 500 healthy knees (250 adults) with a consecutive sample of 710 OA knees (355 adults) undergoing bilateral total knee arthroplasty. The mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) were determined for each knee, and the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity, and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) types were calculated. WSD was defined as a varus mHKA of < -2° in one limb and a valgus mHKA of > 2° in the contralateral limb. The primary outcome was the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between healthy and OA groups. Secondary outcomes were the proportional difference in WSD prevalence between constitutional varus and valgus CPAK types, and to explore associations between predefined variables and WSD within the OA group.

Results: WSD was more prevalent in the OA group compared to the healthy group (7.9% vs 0.4%; p < 0.001, relative risk (RR) 19.8). There was a significant difference in means and variance between the mHKA of the healthy and OA groups (mean -1.3° (SD 2.3°) vs mean -3.8°(SD 6.6°) respectively; p < 0.001). No significant differences existed in MPTA and LDFA between the groups, with a minimal difference in aHKA (mean -0.9° healthy vs -0.5° OA; p < 0.001). Backwards logistic regression identified meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy as predictors of WSD (odds ratio (OR) 4.1 (95% CI 1.7 to 10.0), p = 0.002; OR 11.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 89.3); p = 0.016; OR 41.6 (95% CI 5.4 to 432.9), p ≤ 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: This study found a 20-fold greater prevalence of WSD in OA populations. The development of WSD is associated with meniscectomy, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteotomy. These findings support WSD being mostly an acquired condition following skeletal maturity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信