辅助人工智能对麻醉师区域麻醉超声扫描持续影响的前瞻性随机评估。

IF 2.1 Q2 SURGERY
BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies Pub Date : 2024-10-16 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000264
Chao-Ying Kowa, Megan Morecroft, Alan J R Macfarlane, David Burckett-St Laurent, Amit Pawa, Simeon West, Steve Margetts, Nat Haslam, Toby Ashken, Maria Paz Sebastian, Athmaja Thottungal, Jono Womack, Julia Alison Noble, Helen Higham, James S Bowness
{"title":"辅助人工智能对麻醉师区域麻醉超声扫描持续影响的前瞻性随机评估。","authors":"Chao-Ying Kowa, Megan Morecroft, Alan J R Macfarlane, David Burckett-St Laurent, Amit Pawa, Simeon West, Steve Margetts, Nat Haslam, Toby Ashken, Maria Paz Sebastian, Athmaja Thottungal, Jono Womack, Julia Alison Noble, Helen Higham, James S Bowness","doi":"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) relies on acquiring and interpreting an appropriate view of sonoanatomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to aid this by applying a color overlay to key sonoanatomical structures.The primary aim was to determine whether an AI-generated color overlay was associated with a difference in participants' ability to identify an appropriate block view over a 2-month period after a standardized teaching session (as judged by a blinded assessor). Secondary outcomes included the ability to identify an appropriate block view (unblinded assessor), global rating score and participant confidence scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, partially blinded, prospective cross-over study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Simulation scans on healthy volunteers. Initial assessments on 29 November 2022 and 30 November 2022, with follow-up on 25 January 2023 - 27 January 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>57 junior anesthetists undertook initial assessments and 51 (89.47%) returned at 2 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants performed ultrasound scans for six peripheral nerve blocks, with AI assistance randomized to half of the blocks. Cross-over assignment was employed for 2 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Blinded experts assessed whether the block view acquired was acceptable (yes/no). Unblinded experts also assessed this parameter and provided a global performance rating (0-100). Participants reported scan confidence (0-100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI assistance was associated with a higher rate of appropriate block view acquisition in both blinded and unblinded assessments (p=0.02 and <0.01, respectively). Participant confidence and expert rating scores were superior throughout (all p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assistive AI was associated with superior ultrasound scanning performance 2 months after formal teaching. It may aid application of sonoanatomical knowledge and skills gained in teaching, to support delivery of UGRA beyond the immediate post-teaching period.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.govNCT05583032.</p>","PeriodicalId":33349,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","volume":"6 1","pages":"e000264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487881/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Chao-Ying Kowa, Megan Morecroft, Alan J R Macfarlane, David Burckett-St Laurent, Amit Pawa, Simeon West, Steve Margetts, Nat Haslam, Toby Ashken, Maria Paz Sebastian, Athmaja Thottungal, Jono Womack, Julia Alison Noble, Helen Higham, James S Bowness\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) relies on acquiring and interpreting an appropriate view of sonoanatomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to aid this by applying a color overlay to key sonoanatomical structures.The primary aim was to determine whether an AI-generated color overlay was associated with a difference in participants' ability to identify an appropriate block view over a 2-month period after a standardized teaching session (as judged by a blinded assessor). Secondary outcomes included the ability to identify an appropriate block view (unblinded assessor), global rating score and participant confidence scores.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized, partially blinded, prospective cross-over study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Simulation scans on healthy volunteers. Initial assessments on 29 November 2022 and 30 November 2022, with follow-up on 25 January 2023 - 27 January 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>57 junior anesthetists undertook initial assessments and 51 (89.47%) returned at 2 months.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants performed ultrasound scans for six peripheral nerve blocks, with AI assistance randomized to half of the blocks. Cross-over assignment was employed for 2 months.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Blinded experts assessed whether the block view acquired was acceptable (yes/no). Unblinded experts also assessed this parameter and provided a global performance rating (0-100). Participants reported scan confidence (0-100).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>AI assistance was associated with a higher rate of appropriate block view acquisition in both blinded and unblinded assessments (p=0.02 and <0.01, respectively). Participant confidence and expert rating scores were superior throughout (all p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Assistive AI was associated with superior ultrasound scanning performance 2 months after formal teaching. It may aid application of sonoanatomical knowledge and skills gained in teaching, to support delivery of UGRA beyond the immediate post-teaching period.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>www.clinicaltrials.govNCT05583032.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"e000264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487881/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000264\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Surgery Interventions Health Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsit-2024-000264","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:超声引导区域麻醉(UGRA)依赖于获取和解释适当的声像解剖视图。主要目的是确定人工智能生成的颜色叠加是否与参与者在标准化教学课程结束后两个月内识别适当阻滞视图的能力差异有关(由盲人评估员评判)。次要结果包括识别适当块状视图的能力(无盲评估员)、总体评分和参与者信心分数:随机、部分盲法、前瞻性交叉研究:对健康志愿者进行模拟扫描。初始评估时间为 2022 年 11 月 29 日和 2022 年 11 月 30 日,随访时间为 2023 年 1 月 25 日至 2023 年 1 月 27 日:57名初级麻醉师进行了初步评估,51人(89.47%)在2个月后返回:干预措施:参与者进行六次周围神经阻滞的超声扫描,其中一半阻滞由人工智能协助随机完成。主要结果测量:盲法专家评估获得的阻滞视图是否可接受(是/否)。非盲法专家也对这一参数进行评估,并给出总体性能评分(0-100)。参与者报告扫描信心(0-100):结果:在盲法和非盲法评估中,人工智能辅助与更高的适当区块视图获取率相关(p=0.02),结论:在盲法和非盲法评估中,人工智能辅助与更高的适当区块视图获取率相关(p=0.02):辅助人工智能与正式教学 2 个月后的超声扫描性能优越有关。它可以帮助应用在教学中获得的超声解剖学知识和技能,支持在教学结束后立即进行 UGRA。试验注册号:www.clinicaltrials.govNCT05583032。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prospective randomized evaluation of the sustained impact of assistive artificial intelligence on anesthetists' ultrasound scanning for regional anesthesia.

Objectives: Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia (UGRA) relies on acquiring and interpreting an appropriate view of sonoanatomy. Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to aid this by applying a color overlay to key sonoanatomical structures.The primary aim was to determine whether an AI-generated color overlay was associated with a difference in participants' ability to identify an appropriate block view over a 2-month period after a standardized teaching session (as judged by a blinded assessor). Secondary outcomes included the ability to identify an appropriate block view (unblinded assessor), global rating score and participant confidence scores.

Design: Randomized, partially blinded, prospective cross-over study.

Setting: Simulation scans on healthy volunteers. Initial assessments on 29 November 2022 and 30 November 2022, with follow-up on 25 January 2023 - 27 January 2023.

Participants: 57 junior anesthetists undertook initial assessments and 51 (89.47%) returned at 2 months.

Intervention: Participants performed ultrasound scans for six peripheral nerve blocks, with AI assistance randomized to half of the blocks. Cross-over assignment was employed for 2 months.

Main outcome measures: Blinded experts assessed whether the block view acquired was acceptable (yes/no). Unblinded experts also assessed this parameter and provided a global performance rating (0-100). Participants reported scan confidence (0-100).

Results: AI assistance was associated with a higher rate of appropriate block view acquisition in both blinded and unblinded assessments (p=0.02 and <0.01, respectively). Participant confidence and expert rating scores were superior throughout (all p<0.01).

Conclusions: Assistive AI was associated with superior ultrasound scanning performance 2 months after formal teaching. It may aid application of sonoanatomical knowledge and skills gained in teaching, to support delivery of UGRA beyond the immediate post-teaching period.

Trial registration number: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT05583032.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信