在四个欧洲国家实施量身定制的多方面抗生素管理干预措施,以改善体弱老年人尿路感染的抗生素处方(ImpresU):与实用分组随机对照试验同时进行的过程评估。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s13063-024-08545-4
Esther A R Hartman, Wim G Groen, Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, Morten Lindbæk, Sigurd Høye, Sara Sofia Lithén, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Sofia Sundvall, Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots, Ronny Gunnarsson, Anna Kowalczyk, Maciej Godycki-Cwirko, Alma C van de Pol, Tamara N Platteel, Annelie A Monnier, Theo J M Verheij, Cees M P M Hertogh
{"title":"在四个欧洲国家实施量身定制的多方面抗生素管理干预措施,以改善体弱老年人尿路感染的抗生素处方(ImpresU):与实用分组随机对照试验同时进行的过程评估。","authors":"Esther A R Hartman, Wim G Groen, Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, Morten Lindbæk, Sigurd Høye, Sara Sofia Lithén, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Sofia Sundvall, Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots, Ronny Gunnarsson, Anna Kowalczyk, Maciej Godycki-Cwirko, Alma C van de Pol, Tamara N Platteel, Annelie A Monnier, Theo J M Verheij, Cees M P M Hertogh","doi":"10.1186/s13063-024-08545-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously performed a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) in general practices and older adult care organizations in Poland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. We found that a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention (ASI) substantially reduced antibiotic use for suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in frail older adults compared with usual care. We aimed to evaluate the implementation process of the ASI to provide recommendations for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a process evaluation alongside the cluster RCT. The ASI consisted of a decision-tool and a toolbox, which were implemented using a participatory-action-research (PAR) approach with sessions for education and evaluation. We documented the implementation process of the intervention and administered a questionnaire to health care professionals (HCPs) from participating organizations in the intervention and usual care clusters. We evaluated the multiple components of the intervention and its implementation following a structured framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 254 HCPs from the 38 participating clusters. All components were largely delivered according to plan and evaluated as useful. The decision-tool and toolbox materials were reported to facilitate decision-making on UTIs. Regarding the PAR approach, educational sessions focusing on the distinction between UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria were held in all 19 intervention clusters. In 17 out of these 19 clusters, evaluation sessions took place, which were reported to help remind HCPs to implement the ASI. During both sessions, HCPs valued the reflection that took place and the resulting awareness of their behavior. It allowed them to explore implementation barriers and to tailor their local implementation process to overcome these. For example, HCPs organized extra educational sessions or revised local policies to incorporate the use of the decision-tool. Various HCPs took key roles in implementation. Staff changes and the COVID-19 pandemic were important contextual barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found each component of the multifaceted ASI and its implementation to have added value in the process to improve antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTIs in a heterogeneous older adult care setting. We recommend using a multifaceted, multidisciplinary approach that enables HCPs to reflect on their current practice and accordingly tailor local implementation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03970356. Registered on May 31, 2019.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"25 1","pages":"691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488242/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of a tailored multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections in frail older adults (ImpresU) in four European countries: a process evaluation alongside a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Esther A R Hartman, Wim G Groen, Silje Rebekka Heltveit-Olsen, Morten Lindbæk, Sigurd Høye, Sara Sofia Lithén, Pär-Daniel Sundvall, Sofia Sundvall, Egill Snaebjörnsson Arnljots, Ronny Gunnarsson, Anna Kowalczyk, Maciej Godycki-Cwirko, Alma C van de Pol, Tamara N Platteel, Annelie A Monnier, Theo J M Verheij, Cees M P M Hertogh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-024-08545-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We previously performed a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) in general practices and older adult care organizations in Poland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. We found that a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention (ASI) substantially reduced antibiotic use for suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in frail older adults compared with usual care. We aimed to evaluate the implementation process of the ASI to provide recommendations for clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a process evaluation alongside the cluster RCT. The ASI consisted of a decision-tool and a toolbox, which were implemented using a participatory-action-research (PAR) approach with sessions for education and evaluation. We documented the implementation process of the intervention and administered a questionnaire to health care professionals (HCPs) from participating organizations in the intervention and usual care clusters. We evaluated the multiple components of the intervention and its implementation following a structured framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was completed by 254 HCPs from the 38 participating clusters. All components were largely delivered according to plan and evaluated as useful. The decision-tool and toolbox materials were reported to facilitate decision-making on UTIs. Regarding the PAR approach, educational sessions focusing on the distinction between UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria were held in all 19 intervention clusters. In 17 out of these 19 clusters, evaluation sessions took place, which were reported to help remind HCPs to implement the ASI. During both sessions, HCPs valued the reflection that took place and the resulting awareness of their behavior. It allowed them to explore implementation barriers and to tailor their local implementation process to overcome these. For example, HCPs organized extra educational sessions or revised local policies to incorporate the use of the decision-tool. Various HCPs took key roles in implementation. Staff changes and the COVID-19 pandemic were important contextual barriers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found each component of the multifaceted ASI and its implementation to have added value in the process to improve antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTIs in a heterogeneous older adult care setting. We recommend using a multifaceted, multidisciplinary approach that enables HCPs to reflect on their current practice and accordingly tailor local implementation.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03970356. Registered on May 31, 2019.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"691\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488242/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08545-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08545-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:此前,我们在波兰、荷兰、挪威和瑞典的全科诊所和老年人护理机构开展了一项实用分组随机对照试验(RCT)。我们发现,与常规护理相比,多方面的抗生素管理干预(ASI)大大减少了体弱老年人疑似尿路感染(UTI)的抗生素使用量。我们旨在评估 ASI 的实施过程,为临床实践提供建议:我们在进行分组 RCT 的同时还进行了过程评估。ASI由决策工具和工具箱组成,在实施过程中采用了参与式行动研究(PAR)方法,并设置了教育和评估环节。我们记录了干预措施的实施过程,并对干预群组和常规护理群组中参与机构的医护专业人员(HCP)进行了问卷调查。我们按照结构化框架对干预措施的多个组成部分及其实施情况进行了评估:来自 38 个参与群组的 254 名医护人员填写了调查问卷。所有内容基本上都按计划实施,并被评价为有用。据报告,决策工具和工具箱材料有助于对尿毒症做出决策。关于 PAR 方法,所有 19 个干预群组都举办了教育课程,重点是区分尿毒症和无症状菌尿。在这 19 个群组中,有 17 个群组举办了评估课程,据报告,这些课程有助于提醒保健医生实施 ASI。在这两次会议上,主治医师都非常重视所进行的反思以及由此产生的对自身行为的认识。这使他们能够探索实施障碍,并调整当地的实施过程以克服这些障碍。例如,保健医生组织了额外的教育课程或修订了当地政策,以纳入决策工具的使用。不同的保健中心在实施过程中发挥了关键作用。人员变动和 COVID-19 大流行是重要的背景障碍:我们发现,在不同的老年人护理环境中,多元 ASI 的每个组成部分及其实施都能为改善疑似尿毒症的抗生素处方带来附加值。我们建议采用一种多方面、多学科的方法,使保健人员能够反思其当前的做法,并相应地调整当地的实施情况:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03970356。注册日期:2019年5月31日。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of a tailored multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention to improve antibiotic prescribing for urinary tract infections in frail older adults (ImpresU) in four European countries: a process evaluation alongside a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial.

Background: We previously performed a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) in general practices and older adult care organizations in Poland, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. We found that a multifaceted antibiotic stewardship intervention (ASI) substantially reduced antibiotic use for suspected urinary tract infections (UTIs) in frail older adults compared with usual care. We aimed to evaluate the implementation process of the ASI to provide recommendations for clinical practice.

Methods: We conducted a process evaluation alongside the cluster RCT. The ASI consisted of a decision-tool and a toolbox, which were implemented using a participatory-action-research (PAR) approach with sessions for education and evaluation. We documented the implementation process of the intervention and administered a questionnaire to health care professionals (HCPs) from participating organizations in the intervention and usual care clusters. We evaluated the multiple components of the intervention and its implementation following a structured framework.

Results: The questionnaire was completed by 254 HCPs from the 38 participating clusters. All components were largely delivered according to plan and evaluated as useful. The decision-tool and toolbox materials were reported to facilitate decision-making on UTIs. Regarding the PAR approach, educational sessions focusing on the distinction between UTIs and asymptomatic bacteriuria were held in all 19 intervention clusters. In 17 out of these 19 clusters, evaluation sessions took place, which were reported to help remind HCPs to implement the ASI. During both sessions, HCPs valued the reflection that took place and the resulting awareness of their behavior. It allowed them to explore implementation barriers and to tailor their local implementation process to overcome these. For example, HCPs organized extra educational sessions or revised local policies to incorporate the use of the decision-tool. Various HCPs took key roles in implementation. Staff changes and the COVID-19 pandemic were important contextual barriers.

Conclusions: We found each component of the multifaceted ASI and its implementation to have added value in the process to improve antibiotic prescribing for suspected UTIs in a heterogeneous older adult care setting. We recommend using a multifaceted, multidisciplinary approach that enables HCPs to reflect on their current practice and accordingly tailor local implementation.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03970356. Registered on May 31, 2019.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信