局部晚期直肠癌的进展模式、随访策略和术后结果中与年龄相关的差异:一项大规模验证研究的启示。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/17588359241290129
Yilin Yu, Haixia Wu, Jianjian Qiu, Liang Hong, Shiji Wu, Lingdong Shao, Cheng Lin, Zhiping Wang, Junxin Wu
{"title":"局部晚期直肠癌的进展模式、随访策略和术后结果中与年龄相关的差异:一项大规模验证研究的启示。","authors":"Yilin Yu, Haixia Wu, Jianjian Qiu, Liang Hong, Shiji Wu, Lingdong Shao, Cheng Lin, Zhiping Wang, Junxin Wu","doi":"10.1177/17588359241290129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents significant treatment challenges, particularly as patient age may influence disease progression and treatment response. Understanding the differences in progression patterns and treatment outcomes between older patient (OP) and non-older patient (NOP) is essential for tailoring effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to explore the differences of progression pattern, postoperative treatment, and survival outcome between OP and NOP groups in LARC.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>The random survival forest model was used to determine the probability of time-to-event occurrence every 3 months. Patients in the NOP and OP group were both categorized into three risk groups based on progression-free survival nomogram scores. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to verify our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results revealed that Groups 1, 2, and 3 experienced peaks in progression within the first 24 months in NOP group. As for OP group, Group 4 reached a progression peak at the 18th month, Group 5 at the 12th month, and Group 6 at the 9th month. In NOP group, high-risk patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had significantly improved overall survival compared to those who did not. Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy did not significantly improve prognosis for patients in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups of OP group. Finally, the validation results of IPTW analysis and SEER database showed compliance with our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For NOP group, we recommended close follow-up during the first 2 years. As for OP group, it was suggested to conduct close follow-up at the 18th, 12th, and 9th month for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy can provide survival benefits for patients in high-risk group of NOP group. However, OP group patients should be informed that the potential benefits of postoperative chemotherapy may be minimal.</p>","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"16 ","pages":"17588359241290129"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487512/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age-related differences in progression patterns, follow-up strategies, and postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: insights from a large-scale validated study.\",\"authors\":\"Yilin Yu, Haixia Wu, Jianjian Qiu, Liang Hong, Shiji Wu, Lingdong Shao, Cheng Lin, Zhiping Wang, Junxin Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241290129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents significant treatment challenges, particularly as patient age may influence disease progression and treatment response. Understanding the differences in progression patterns and treatment outcomes between older patient (OP) and non-older patient (NOP) is essential for tailoring effective management strategies.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to explore the differences of progression pattern, postoperative treatment, and survival outcome between OP and NOP groups in LARC.</p><p><strong>Design/methods: </strong>The random survival forest model was used to determine the probability of time-to-event occurrence every 3 months. Patients in the NOP and OP group were both categorized into three risk groups based on progression-free survival nomogram scores. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to verify our findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our results revealed that Groups 1, 2, and 3 experienced peaks in progression within the first 24 months in NOP group. As for OP group, Group 4 reached a progression peak at the 18th month, Group 5 at the 12th month, and Group 6 at the 9th month. In NOP group, high-risk patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had significantly improved overall survival compared to those who did not. Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy did not significantly improve prognosis for patients in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups of OP group. Finally, the validation results of IPTW analysis and SEER database showed compliance with our findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For NOP group, we recommended close follow-up during the first 2 years. As for OP group, it was suggested to conduct close follow-up at the 18th, 12th, and 9th month for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy can provide survival benefits for patients in high-risk group of NOP group. However, OP group patients should be informed that the potential benefits of postoperative chemotherapy may be minimal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"17588359241290129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487512/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241290129\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241290129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)给治疗带来了巨大挑战,尤其是患者年龄可能会影响疾病进展和治疗反应。了解老年患者(OP)和非老年患者(NOP)在疾病进展模式和治疗效果方面的差异,对于制定有效的治疗策略至关重要:目的:我们旨在探讨 LARC 患者中 OP 组和 NOP 组在进展模式、术后治疗和生存结果方面的差异:设计/方法:采用随机生存森林模型确定每 3 个月事件发生的时间概率。NOP组和OP组患者均根据无进展生存期提名图评分分为三个风险组。我们采用了反向治疗概率加权(IPTW)分析和监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库来验证我们的研究结果:结果显示,NOP 组的第 1、2 和 3 组在最初 24 个月内出现了进展高峰。至于 OP 组,第 4 组在第 18 个月达到进展高峰,第 5 组在第 12 个月,第 6 组在第 9 个月。在 NOP 组中,与未接受术后化疗的患者相比,接受术后化疗的高危患者的总生存率明显提高。此外,术后化疗并不能明显改善 OP 组低、中、高危患者的预后。最后,IPTW分析和SEER数据库的验证结果显示与我们的研究结果一致:结论:对于 NOP 组,我们建议在头两年进行密切随访。结论:对于 NOP 组,我们建议在最初 2 年进行密切随访;对于 OP 组,建议分别在第 18 个月、第 12 个月和第 9 个月对低危、中危和高危组进行密切随访。此外,术后化疗可为 NOP 组的高危患者带来生存益处。但应告知 OP 组患者,术后化疗的潜在益处可能微乎其微。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age-related differences in progression patterns, follow-up strategies, and postoperative outcomes in locally advanced rectal cancer: insights from a large-scale validated study.

Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) presents significant treatment challenges, particularly as patient age may influence disease progression and treatment response. Understanding the differences in progression patterns and treatment outcomes between older patient (OP) and non-older patient (NOP) is essential for tailoring effective management strategies.

Objectives: We aimed to explore the differences of progression pattern, postoperative treatment, and survival outcome between OP and NOP groups in LARC.

Design/methods: The random survival forest model was used to determine the probability of time-to-event occurrence every 3 months. Patients in the NOP and OP group were both categorized into three risk groups based on progression-free survival nomogram scores. We employed inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to verify our findings.

Results: Our results revealed that Groups 1, 2, and 3 experienced peaks in progression within the first 24 months in NOP group. As for OP group, Group 4 reached a progression peak at the 18th month, Group 5 at the 12th month, and Group 6 at the 9th month. In NOP group, high-risk patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had significantly improved overall survival compared to those who did not. Additionally, postoperative chemotherapy did not significantly improve prognosis for patients in low-, moderate-, or high-risk groups of OP group. Finally, the validation results of IPTW analysis and SEER database showed compliance with our findings.

Conclusion: For NOP group, we recommended close follow-up during the first 2 years. As for OP group, it was suggested to conduct close follow-up at the 18th, 12th, and 9th month for low-, moderate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Furthermore, postoperative chemotherapy can provide survival benefits for patients in high-risk group of NOP group. However, OP group patients should be informed that the potential benefits of postoperative chemotherapy may be minimal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信