多地点试验中的因果效应和违规行为的变异性:二元结果的二元分层广义随机系数模型。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY
Statistics in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-10 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1002/sim.10229
Xinxin Sun, Yongyun Shin, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Stephen W Raudenbush
{"title":"多地点试验中的因果效应和违规行为的变异性:二元结果的二元分层广义随机系数模型。","authors":"Xinxin Sun, Yongyun Shin, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Stephen W Raudenbush","doi":"10.1002/sim.10229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within each of 170 physicians, patients were randomized to access e-assist, an online program that aimed to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), or control. Compliance was partial: <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>78.34</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ 78.34\\% $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of the experimental patients accessed e-assist while no controls were provided the access. Of interest are the average causal effect of assignment to treatment and the complier average causal effect as well as the variation of these causal effects across physicians. Each physician generates probabilities of screening for experimental compliers (experimental patients who accessed e-assist), control compliers (controls who would have accessed e-assist had they been assigned to e-assist), and never takers (patients who would have avoided e-assist no matter what). Estimating physician-specific probabilities jointly over physicians poses novel challenges. We address these challenges by maximum likelihood, factoring a \"complete-data likelihood\" uniquely into the conditional distribution of screening and partially observed compliance given random effects and the distribution of random effects. We marginalize this likelihood using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature. The approach is doubly iterative in that the conditional distribution defies analytic evaluation. Because the small sample size per physician constrains estimability of multiple random effects, we reduce their dimensionality using a shared random effects model having a factor analytic structure. We assess estimators and recommend sample sizes to produce reasonably accurate and precise estimates by simulation, and analyze data from a trial of a CRCS intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"5353-5365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Variability in Causal Effects and Noncompliance in a Multisite Trial: A Bivariate Hierarchical Generalized Random Coefficients Model for a Binary Outcome.\",\"authors\":\"Xinxin Sun, Yongyun Shin, Jennifer Elston Lafata, Stephen W Raudenbush\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/sim.10229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Within each of 170 physicians, patients were randomized to access e-assist, an online program that aimed to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), or control. Compliance was partial: <math> <semantics><mrow><mn>78.34</mn> <mo>%</mo></mrow> <annotation>$$ 78.34\\\\% $$</annotation></semantics> </math> of the experimental patients accessed e-assist while no controls were provided the access. Of interest are the average causal effect of assignment to treatment and the complier average causal effect as well as the variation of these causal effects across physicians. Each physician generates probabilities of screening for experimental compliers (experimental patients who accessed e-assist), control compliers (controls who would have accessed e-assist had they been assigned to e-assist), and never takers (patients who would have avoided e-assist no matter what). Estimating physician-specific probabilities jointly over physicians poses novel challenges. We address these challenges by maximum likelihood, factoring a \\\"complete-data likelihood\\\" uniquely into the conditional distribution of screening and partially observed compliance given random effects and the distribution of random effects. We marginalize this likelihood using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature. The approach is doubly iterative in that the conditional distribution defies analytic evaluation. Because the small sample size per physician constrains estimability of multiple random effects, we reduce their dimensionality using a shared random effects model having a factor analytic structure. We assess estimators and recommend sample sizes to produce reasonably accurate and precise estimates by simulation, and analyze data from a trial of a CRCS intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5353-5365\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586915/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistics in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10229\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在 170 名医生中,每名患者都被随机分配到旨在提高结直肠癌筛查率(CRCS)的在线项目 e-assist 或对照组中。部分患者遵从了这一计划:78.34% 的实验患者使用了电子辅助工具,而对照组患者则没有使用。值得关注的是分配治疗的平均因果效应和辅助者的平均因果效应,以及这些因果效应在不同医生之间的差异。每位医生都会产生筛选实验感染者(接受过电子辅助治疗的实验患者)、对照感染者(如果被分配接受电子辅助治疗,就会接受电子辅助治疗的对照组患者)和从不接受治疗者(无论如何都不会接受电子辅助治疗的患者)的概率。对医生的特定概率进行联合估计带来了新的挑战。我们通过最大似然法来解决这些难题,将 "完整数据似然法 "唯一地考虑到随机效应和随机效应分布下筛查和部分观察依从性的条件分布。我们使用自适应高斯-赫米特正交法对该可能性进行边际化。这种方法具有双重迭代性,因为条件分布无法进行分析评估。由于每位医生的样本量较小,限制了多重随机效应的可估算性,因此我们使用具有因子分析结构的共享随机效应模型来降低其维度。我们通过模拟评估估算器和建议样本量,以得出合理准确的估算结果,并分析了 CRCS 干预试验的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Variability in Causal Effects and Noncompliance in a Multisite Trial: A Bivariate Hierarchical Generalized Random Coefficients Model for a Binary Outcome.

Within each of 170 physicians, patients were randomized to access e-assist, an online program that aimed to increase colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), or control. Compliance was partial: 78.34 % $$ 78.34\% $$ of the experimental patients accessed e-assist while no controls were provided the access. Of interest are the average causal effect of assignment to treatment and the complier average causal effect as well as the variation of these causal effects across physicians. Each physician generates probabilities of screening for experimental compliers (experimental patients who accessed e-assist), control compliers (controls who would have accessed e-assist had they been assigned to e-assist), and never takers (patients who would have avoided e-assist no matter what). Estimating physician-specific probabilities jointly over physicians poses novel challenges. We address these challenges by maximum likelihood, factoring a "complete-data likelihood" uniquely into the conditional distribution of screening and partially observed compliance given random effects and the distribution of random effects. We marginalize this likelihood using adaptive Gauss-Hermite quadrature. The approach is doubly iterative in that the conditional distribution defies analytic evaluation. Because the small sample size per physician constrains estimability of multiple random effects, we reduce their dimensionality using a shared random effects model having a factor analytic structure. We assess estimators and recommend sample sizes to produce reasonably accurate and precise estimates by simulation, and analyze data from a trial of a CRCS intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistics in Medicine
Statistics in Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
334
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信