Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert
{"title":"早期分析内皮标志物,预测急诊科败血症。","authors":"Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Analysis of Endothelial Markers to predict Sepsis in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Early Analysis of Endothelial Markers to predict Sepsis in the Emergency Department.
Background: Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.
Methods: Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.
Results: For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.
Conclusions: Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.
期刊介绍:
SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.