早期分析内皮标志物,预测急诊科败血症。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
SHOCK Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482
Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert
{"title":"早期分析内皮标志物,预测急诊科败血症。","authors":"Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert","doi":"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":21667,"journal":{"name":"SHOCK","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Analysis of Endothelial Markers to predict Sepsis in the Emergency Department.\",\"authors\":\"Noa Galtung, Vanessa Stein, Monika Prpic, Burak Boyraz, Jannis Ulke, Stephan Kurz, Jens Dernedde, Eva Diehl-Wiesenecker, Wolfgang Bauer, Kai Kappert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21667,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SHOCK\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SHOCK\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SHOCK","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SHK.0000000000002482","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急性感染和败血症是导致死亡的主要原因。这些患者主要在急诊科(ED)就诊,必须及早评估败血症,以改善预后。脓毒症时,炎症反应会引起几种特征性的病理生理变化,包括内皮失调和普遍激活。本研究旨在分析释放到血液中的内皮标志物,作为急诊室急性感染和脓毒症的诊断生物标志物,因为之前的小型研究已在其他环境中显示出良好的效果:方法: 研究人员采集了 n = 312 名急诊室疑似急性感染成人患者的血清样本。患者的病程和结果由临床判定进行评估。E-选择素、P-选择素、ICAM-1 和 VCAM-1 通过 ELISAs 检测。评估了每种标记物预测细菌感染、败血症和院内死亡率的准确性:结果:对于败血症,E-选择素和ICAM-1的AUROC均为0.62,低于降钙素原的0.77(P均<0.01)和乳酸的0.73(P分别为0.030和0.046),但与CRP的0.60(P分别为0.758和0.876)相似。对于感染患者的 28 天院内死亡率,ICAM-1 的 AUROC 为 0.75,表现最佳:尽管在小型研究和特定队列中,特别是在重症监护病房中取得了令人鼓舞的结果,但对四种内皮生物标志物的大规模评估突出表明,在更广泛的纳入设置设计中,在尽可能早的评估时间点上,这些生物标志物的诊断效用有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early Analysis of Endothelial Markers to predict Sepsis in the Emergency Department.

Background: Acute infections and sepsis are a leading cause of death. These patients are primarily encountered at the emergency department (ED), where early assessment for sepsis is necessary to improve outcome. In sepsis, the inflammatory response causes several characteristic pathophysiological changes, including a dysregulated and generalized activation of the endothelium. This study aimed to analyse endothelial markers released to the blood as diagnostic biomarkers for acute infection and sepsis in the ED, as smaller studies have previously shown promising results in other settings.

Methods: Serum samples from n = 312 adult patients with suspected acute infections at presentation to the ED were utilized. Patients' courses of disease and outcomes were assessed by clinical adjudication. E-Selectin, P-Selectin, ICAM-1, and VCAM-1 were measured by ELISAs. The accuracy of each marker for predicting bacterial infection, sepsis, and in-hospital mortality, was evaluated.

Results: For sepsis, E-Selectin and ICAM-1 both showed an AUROC of 0.62, lower than procalcitonin with 0.77 (both p < 0.01) and lactate with 0.73 (p = 0.030 and 0.046, respectively), but similar to CRP with 0.60 (p = 0.758 and 0.876, respectively). For 28-day in-hospital mortality among patients with infection, ICAM-1 performed best with an AUROC of 0.75.

Conclusions: Despite promising results in small studies and specific cohorts, particularly in intensive care units, this large-scale evaluation of four endothelial biomarkers highlights their limited diagnostic utility in a broader inclusion set-up design at the earliest possible time-point of evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SHOCK
SHOCK 医学-外科
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
199
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: SHOCK®: Injury, Inflammation, and Sepsis: Laboratory and Clinical Approaches includes studies of novel therapeutic approaches, such as immunomodulation, gene therapy, nutrition, and others. The mission of the Journal is to foster and promote multidisciplinary studies, both experimental and clinical in nature, that critically examine the etiology, mechanisms and novel therapeutics of shock-related pathophysiological conditions. Its purpose is to excel as a vehicle for timely publication in the areas of basic and clinical studies of shock, trauma, sepsis, inflammation, ischemia, and related pathobiological states, with particular emphasis on the biologic mechanisms that determine the response to such injury. Making such information available will ultimately facilitate improved care of the traumatized or septic individual.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信