咖啡与案例 (C&C) - 从直升机紧急医疗服务的临床汇报中加强知识创造和共享,促进组织学习:质量改进研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Robert Lloyd, Jacob Tant, Clare Richmond, Natalie May, Shannon Townsend, Robin Pap
{"title":"咖啡与案例 (C&C) - 从直升机紧急医疗服务的临床汇报中加强知识创造和共享,促进组织学习:质量改进研究。","authors":"Robert Lloyd, Jacob Tant, Clare Richmond, Natalie May, Shannon Townsend, Robin Pap","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2024.2417842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this quality improvement (QI) study was to improve organizational learning from clinical debriefs known as \"Coffee and Cases\" (C&C) in a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) by increasing weekly learning summaries (LS) and documented learning points (DLP) as well as the dissemination thereof by at least 50% from baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The problem analysis for sub-optimal organizational learning from C&C identified several factors, including lack of responsibility, poor documentation quality, and limited sharing of learning points. Using the Model for Improvement (MFI), interventions enhanced the learning environment, and improved documentation and dissemination. Changes included dedicated computers, introducing standardized processes, a newsletter, and a searchable DLP database. Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to assess the effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to interventions (August 2022 to January 2023), baseline mean counts of weekly DLPs, LSs, DLPs internally disseminated, and DLPs openly disseminated were 3.18, 2.67, 3.18, and 2.96, respectively. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles included declaring C&C as a non-clinical portfolio, redesigning documentation processes, initiating monthly newsletters, developing a DLP repository, and designing a C&C visual brand. Signals of special cause variation showed improvements, with mean counts increasing. Weekly DLPs increased to 14.92, LSs to 5.2, internally disseminated C&C Snippets to 11.88, and openly disseminated C&C Snippets to 8.64.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognizing barriers to effective knowledge creation and sharing, our QI study aimed to increase weekly DLPs and LSs by 50% from baseline. It aligned with the relationship between knowledge management and organizational learning, emphasizing the importance of utilizing knowledge for improved performance. Our interventions enhanced the learning environment, ensured robust capturing of learning points and effective communication thereof, ultimately contributing toward improving organizational dissemination of learning from clinical debriefs. Our QI study demonstrates how enhanced knowledge creation and sharing can widen the benefits of learning from clinical team debriefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coffee and Cases (C&C) - Enhancing Knowledge Creation and Sharing for Organizational Learning From Clinical Debriefs in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service: A Quality Improvement Study.\",\"authors\":\"Robert Lloyd, Jacob Tant, Clare Richmond, Natalie May, Shannon Townsend, Robin Pap\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10903127.2024.2417842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of this quality improvement (QI) study was to improve organizational learning from clinical debriefs known as \\\"Coffee and Cases\\\" (C&C) in a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) by increasing weekly learning summaries (LS) and documented learning points (DLP) as well as the dissemination thereof by at least 50% from baseline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The problem analysis for sub-optimal organizational learning from C&C identified several factors, including lack of responsibility, poor documentation quality, and limited sharing of learning points. Using the Model for Improvement (MFI), interventions enhanced the learning environment, and improved documentation and dissemination. Changes included dedicated computers, introducing standardized processes, a newsletter, and a searchable DLP database. Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to assess the effectiveness of interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to interventions (August 2022 to January 2023), baseline mean counts of weekly DLPs, LSs, DLPs internally disseminated, and DLPs openly disseminated were 3.18, 2.67, 3.18, and 2.96, respectively. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles included declaring C&C as a non-clinical portfolio, redesigning documentation processes, initiating monthly newsletters, developing a DLP repository, and designing a C&C visual brand. Signals of special cause variation showed improvements, with mean counts increasing. Weekly DLPs increased to 14.92, LSs to 5.2, internally disseminated C&C Snippets to 11.88, and openly disseminated C&C Snippets to 8.64.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognizing barriers to effective knowledge creation and sharing, our QI study aimed to increase weekly DLPs and LSs by 50% from baseline. It aligned with the relationship between knowledge management and organizational learning, emphasizing the importance of utilizing knowledge for improved performance. Our interventions enhanced the learning environment, ensured robust capturing of learning points and effective communication thereof, ultimately contributing toward improving organizational dissemination of learning from clinical debriefs. Our QI study demonstrates how enhanced knowledge creation and sharing can widen the benefits of learning from clinical team debriefs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20336,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2417842\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2024.2417842","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的这项质量改进(QI)研究的目的是在直升机紧急医疗服务(HEMS)中,通过每周学习总结(LS)和记录的学习要点(DLP)及其传播比基线至少增加 50%,来提高组织从临床汇报(即 "咖啡与病例"(C&C))中的学习:方法:对组织从 C&C 中学习效果不佳的问题进行了分析,确定了几个因素,包括缺乏责任感、文件质量差和学习要点分享有限。利用改进模式 (MFI),干预措施改善了学习环境,改进了文件编制和传播。所做的改变包括配备专用电脑、引入标准化流程、出版通讯和建立可搜索的 DLP 数据库。使用统计过程控制(SPC)图表来评估干预措施的效果:干预前(2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 1 月),每周 DLP、LS、内部传播的 DLP 和公开传播的 DLP 的基线平均计数分别为 3.18、2.67、3.18 和 2.96。计划-实施-研究-行动(PDSA)周期包括将 C&C 宣布为非临床组合、重新设计文档流程、启动每月通讯、开发 DLP 储存库以及设计 C&C 视觉品牌。特殊原因变异信号有所改善,平均计数有所增加。每周 DLP 增加到 14.92 个,LS 增加到 5.2 个,内部传播的 C&C 片段增加到 11.88 个,公开传播的 C&C 片段增加到 8.64 个:认识到有效创造和分享知识的障碍,我们的 QI 研究旨在将每周的 DLP 和 LS 从基线提高 50%。它符合知识管理与组织学习之间的关系,强调了利用知识提高绩效的重要性。我们的干预措施改善了学习环境,确保了学习要点的有力捕捉和有效沟通,最终促进了临床汇报中学习成果的组织传播。我们的 QI 研究表明,加强知识创造和共享可以扩大从临床团队汇报中学习的益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Coffee and Cases (C&C) - Enhancing Knowledge Creation and Sharing for Organizational Learning From Clinical Debriefs in a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service: A Quality Improvement Study.

Objectives: The objective of this quality improvement (QI) study was to improve organizational learning from clinical debriefs known as "Coffee and Cases" (C&C) in a helicopter emergency medical service (HEMS) by increasing weekly learning summaries (LS) and documented learning points (DLP) as well as the dissemination thereof by at least 50% from baseline.

Methods: The problem analysis for sub-optimal organizational learning from C&C identified several factors, including lack of responsibility, poor documentation quality, and limited sharing of learning points. Using the Model for Improvement (MFI), interventions enhanced the learning environment, and improved documentation and dissemination. Changes included dedicated computers, introducing standardized processes, a newsletter, and a searchable DLP database. Statistical process control (SPC) charts were used to assess the effectiveness of interventions.

Results: Prior to interventions (August 2022 to January 2023), baseline mean counts of weekly DLPs, LSs, DLPs internally disseminated, and DLPs openly disseminated were 3.18, 2.67, 3.18, and 2.96, respectively. Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles included declaring C&C as a non-clinical portfolio, redesigning documentation processes, initiating monthly newsletters, developing a DLP repository, and designing a C&C visual brand. Signals of special cause variation showed improvements, with mean counts increasing. Weekly DLPs increased to 14.92, LSs to 5.2, internally disseminated C&C Snippets to 11.88, and openly disseminated C&C Snippets to 8.64.

Conclusions: Recognizing barriers to effective knowledge creation and sharing, our QI study aimed to increase weekly DLPs and LSs by 50% from baseline. It aligned with the relationship between knowledge management and organizational learning, emphasizing the importance of utilizing knowledge for improved performance. Our interventions enhanced the learning environment, ensured robust capturing of learning points and effective communication thereof, ultimately contributing toward improving organizational dissemination of learning from clinical debriefs. Our QI study demonstrates how enhanced knowledge creation and sharing can widen the benefits of learning from clinical team debriefs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信