Tim J Wood, Anne T Davis, James Earley, Sue Edyvean, Una Findlay, Rebecca Lindsay, Rosaleen Plaistow, Matthew Williams
{"title":"IPEM 专题报告:英国首次对成年患者放疗验证成像中锥束 CT 剂量指数的调查。","authors":"Tim J Wood, Anne T Davis, James Earley, Sue Edyvean, Una Findlay, Rebecca Lindsay, Rosaleen Plaistow, Matthew Williams","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad88d1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cone beam CT is integral to most modern radiotherapy treatments. The application of daily and repeat CBCT imaging can lead to high imaging doses over a large volume of tissue that extends beyond the treatment site. Hence, it is important to ensure exposures are optimised to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable, whilst ensuring images are suitable for the clinical task. This IPEM topical report presents the results of the first UK survey of dose indices in radiotherapy CBCT. Dose measurements, as defined by the cone beam dose index (CBDI<sub>w</sub>), were collected along with protocol information for seven treatment sites. Where a range of optimised protocols were available in a centre, a sample of patient data demonstrating the variation in protocol use were requested. Protocol CBDI<sub>w</sub>values were determined from the average dosimetry data for each type of linear accelerator, and median CBDI<sub>w</sub>and scan length were calculated for each treatment site at each centre. Median CBDI<sub>w</sub>values were compared and summary statistics derived that enable the setting of national dose reference levels (DRLs). A total of 63 UK radiotherapy centres contributed data. The proposed CBDI<sub>w</sub>DRLs are; prostate 20.6 mGy, gynaecological 20.8 mGy, breast 5.0 mGy, 3D-lung 6.0 mGy, 4D-lung 11.8 mGy, brain 3.5 mGy and head/neck 4.2 mGy. However, large differences between models of imaging system were noted. Where centres had pro-active optimisation strategies in place, such as sized based protocols with selection criteria, dose reductions on the 'average' patient were possible compared with vendor defaults. Optimisation of scan length was noted in some clinical sites, with Elekta users tending to fit different collimators for prostate imaging (relatively short) compared with gynaecological treatments (longest). This contrasts with most Varian users who apply the default scan length in most cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":20185,"journal":{"name":"Physics in medicine and biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IPEM topical report: the first UK survey of cone beam CT dose indices in radiotherapy verification imaging for adult patients.\",\"authors\":\"Tim J Wood, Anne T Davis, James Earley, Sue Edyvean, Una Findlay, Rebecca Lindsay, Rosaleen Plaistow, Matthew Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad88d1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Cone beam CT is integral to most modern radiotherapy treatments. The application of daily and repeat CBCT imaging can lead to high imaging doses over a large volume of tissue that extends beyond the treatment site. Hence, it is important to ensure exposures are optimised to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable, whilst ensuring images are suitable for the clinical task. This IPEM topical report presents the results of the first UK survey of dose indices in radiotherapy CBCT. Dose measurements, as defined by the cone beam dose index (CBDI<sub>w</sub>), were collected along with protocol information for seven treatment sites. Where a range of optimised protocols were available in a centre, a sample of patient data demonstrating the variation in protocol use were requested. Protocol CBDI<sub>w</sub>values were determined from the average dosimetry data for each type of linear accelerator, and median CBDI<sub>w</sub>and scan length were calculated for each treatment site at each centre. Median CBDI<sub>w</sub>values were compared and summary statistics derived that enable the setting of national dose reference levels (DRLs). A total of 63 UK radiotherapy centres contributed data. The proposed CBDI<sub>w</sub>DRLs are; prostate 20.6 mGy, gynaecological 20.8 mGy, breast 5.0 mGy, 3D-lung 6.0 mGy, 4D-lung 11.8 mGy, brain 3.5 mGy and head/neck 4.2 mGy. However, large differences between models of imaging system were noted. Where centres had pro-active optimisation strategies in place, such as sized based protocols with selection criteria, dose reductions on the 'average' patient were possible compared with vendor defaults. Optimisation of scan length was noted in some clinical sites, with Elekta users tending to fit different collimators for prostate imaging (relatively short) compared with gynaecological treatments (longest). This contrasts with most Varian users who apply the default scan length in most cases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in medicine and biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad88d1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in medicine and biology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad88d1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
IPEM topical report: the first UK survey of cone beam CT dose indices in radiotherapy verification imaging for adult patients.
Cone beam CT is integral to most modern radiotherapy treatments. The application of daily and repeat CBCT imaging can lead to high imaging doses over a large volume of tissue that extends beyond the treatment site. Hence, it is important to ensure exposures are optimised to keep doses as low as reasonably achievable, whilst ensuring images are suitable for the clinical task. This IPEM topical report presents the results of the first UK survey of dose indices in radiotherapy CBCT. Dose measurements, as defined by the cone beam dose index (CBDIw), were collected along with protocol information for seven treatment sites. Where a range of optimised protocols were available in a centre, a sample of patient data demonstrating the variation in protocol use were requested. Protocol CBDIwvalues were determined from the average dosimetry data for each type of linear accelerator, and median CBDIwand scan length were calculated for each treatment site at each centre. Median CBDIwvalues were compared and summary statistics derived that enable the setting of national dose reference levels (DRLs). A total of 63 UK radiotherapy centres contributed data. The proposed CBDIwDRLs are; prostate 20.6 mGy, gynaecological 20.8 mGy, breast 5.0 mGy, 3D-lung 6.0 mGy, 4D-lung 11.8 mGy, brain 3.5 mGy and head/neck 4.2 mGy. However, large differences between models of imaging system were noted. Where centres had pro-active optimisation strategies in place, such as sized based protocols with selection criteria, dose reductions on the 'average' patient were possible compared with vendor defaults. Optimisation of scan length was noted in some clinical sites, with Elekta users tending to fit different collimators for prostate imaging (relatively short) compared with gynaecological treatments (longest). This contrasts with most Varian users who apply the default scan length in most cases.
期刊介绍:
The development and application of theoretical, computational and experimental physics to medicine, physiology and biology. Topics covered are: therapy physics (including ionizing and non-ionizing radiation); biomedical imaging (e.g. x-ray, magnetic resonance, ultrasound, optical and nuclear imaging); image-guided interventions; image reconstruction and analysis (including kinetic modelling); artificial intelligence in biomedical physics and analysis; nanoparticles in imaging and therapy; radiobiology; radiation protection and patient dose monitoring; radiation dosimetry