分析基底动脉内陷和寰枢关节脱位患者的后窝减压失败案例和有效的翻修手术。

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1111/os.14252
Maoyang Qi, Yueqi Du, Boyan Zhang, Zong Xin, Can Zhang, Zhenlei Liu, Jian Guan, Zuowei Wang, Fengzeng Jian, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen
{"title":"分析基底动脉内陷和寰枢关节脱位患者的后窝减压失败案例和有效的翻修手术。","authors":"Maoyang Qi, Yueqi Du, Boyan Zhang, Zong Xin, Can Zhang, Zhenlei Liu, Jian Guan, Zuowei Wang, Fengzeng Jian, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen","doi":"10.1111/os.14252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one-stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 21 patients with BI-AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF-12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus-canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre- and postoperative results were compared by paired t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow-up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI-AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12-month follow-up period. The JOA and SF-12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"3088-3097"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation.\",\"authors\":\"Maoyang Qi, Yueqi Du, Boyan Zhang, Zong Xin, Can Zhang, Zhenlei Liu, Jian Guan, Zuowei Wang, Fengzeng Jian, Wanru Duan, Zan Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/os.14252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one-stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 21 patients with BI-AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF-12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus-canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre- and postoperative results were compared by paired t test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow-up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI-AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12-month follow-up period. The JOA and SF-12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3088-3097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11608764/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14252\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14252","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在分析基底动脉内陷和寰枢关节脱位(BI-AAD)患者的后窝减压(PFD)失败情况。这类患者的翻修手术具有挑战性,且鲜有报道。此外,椎动脉的解剖变异也增加了翻修手术的风险。在此,我们介绍了一种新型的一期后路翻修手术的实施情况,并对其难点和效果进行了总结:回顾性分析我中心自2017年11月至2021年4月共21例接受PFD的BI-AAD患者。所有患者的翻修手术均通过后路进行。采用日本骨科协会(JOA)评分和短期12(SF-12)评分来评估临床症状和健康状况。对骨突顶端到张伯伦线(DCL)的距离、寰齿间隙(ADI)、颅颌角(CCA)、蛛网膜下腔直径(DSS)和颅椎交界三角区(CTA)进行放射学评估。通过配对 t 检验比较术前和术后结果:结果:对连续 21 例患者的数据进行了回顾,平均随访时间为(28 ± 14)个月。术后造影显示,BI-AAD 的压迫有效减轻。未发生植入失败或神经血管损伤。有 11 名患者出现椎动脉异常,但没有人出现椎动脉损伤。在 12 个月的随访期间,所有患者的 CT 扫描图像上都有骨融合的迹象。术后 1 年,JOA 和 SF-12 评分均有明显改善(p 结论:术后 1 年,JOA 和 SF-12 评分均有明显改善:采用关节间牵引、骨笼移植融合和固定技术的后路手术是一种安全有效的翻修手术,可用于治疗 PFD 失败的基底内陷和寰枢关节脱位患者,并可获得良好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation.

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one-stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized.

Methods: A total of 21 patients with BI-AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF-12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain's line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus-canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre- and postoperative results were compared by paired t test.

Results: The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow-up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI-AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12-month follow-up period. The JOA and SF-12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信