动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血未获控制期间的血压升高与蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤再出血:系统回顾

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Luke A Terrett, Jessica Reszel, Sara Ameri, Alexis F Turgeon, Lauralyn McIntyre, Shane W English
{"title":"动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血未获控制期间的血压升高与蛛网膜下腔动脉瘤再出血:系统回顾","authors":"Luke A Terrett, Jessica Reszel, Sara Ameri, Alexis F Turgeon, Lauralyn McIntyre, Shane W English","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02138-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, rebleeding prior to securing the culprit aneurysm leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Elevated blood pressure has been identified as a possible risk factor. In this systematic review, we evaluated the association between elevated blood pressure and aneurysm rebleeding during the unsecured period. We searched MEDLINE, Embase + Embase Classic, and CENTRAL, from inception to March 8th, 2024. We included studies of adults with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reporting at least one blood pressure measurement during the unsecured period and a measure of association with rebleeding. Results were stratified by blood pressure thresholds, effect measure, and adjustment for confounding. Separate meta-analyses were performed for each of these groups. Our search identified 5,209 citations. After screening, 15 studies were included in our review. All studies were observational in design and at moderate or high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the unadjusted results produced mixed findings across the systolic blood pressure (SBP) thresholds: SBP > 140 mm Hg, unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 66%); SBP > 160 mm Hg, uOR 3.35 (95% CI 1.44-7.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%); SBP > 180 mm Hg, uOR 1.52 (95% CI 0.40-5.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%); and SBP > 200 mm Hg, uOR 7.99 (95% CI 3.60-17.72; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Meta-analysis of adjusted results was only possible at an SBP > 160 mm Hg; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 (95% CI 0.98-1.31; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The overall quality of evidence as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was rated as very low. Based on very low quality evidence, our systematic review failed to determine whether there is an association between elevated blood pressure during the unsecured period and increased risk of culprit aneurysm rebleeding.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated Blood Pressure and Culprit Aneurysm Rebleeding During the Unsecured Period of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Luke A Terrett, Jessica Reszel, Sara Ameri, Alexis F Turgeon, Lauralyn McIntyre, Shane W English\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02138-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, rebleeding prior to securing the culprit aneurysm leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Elevated blood pressure has been identified as a possible risk factor. In this systematic review, we evaluated the association between elevated blood pressure and aneurysm rebleeding during the unsecured period. We searched MEDLINE, Embase + Embase Classic, and CENTRAL, from inception to March 8th, 2024. We included studies of adults with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reporting at least one blood pressure measurement during the unsecured period and a measure of association with rebleeding. Results were stratified by blood pressure thresholds, effect measure, and adjustment for confounding. Separate meta-analyses were performed for each of these groups. Our search identified 5,209 citations. After screening, 15 studies were included in our review. All studies were observational in design and at moderate or high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the unadjusted results produced mixed findings across the systolic blood pressure (SBP) thresholds: SBP > 140 mm Hg, unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 66%); SBP > 160 mm Hg, uOR 3.35 (95% CI 1.44-7.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 83%); SBP > 180 mm Hg, uOR 1.52 (95% CI 0.40-5.81; I<sup>2</sup> = 89%); and SBP > 200 mm Hg, uOR 7.99 (95% CI 3.60-17.72; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Meta-analysis of adjusted results was only possible at an SBP > 160 mm Hg; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 (95% CI 0.98-1.31; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). The overall quality of evidence as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was rated as very low. Based on very low quality evidence, our systematic review failed to determine whether there is an association between elevated blood pressure during the unsecured period and increased risk of culprit aneurysm rebleeding.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02138-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02138-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血中,在固定罪魁祸首动脉瘤之前再次出血会导致严重的发病率和死亡率。血压升高被认为是一个可能的风险因素。在这篇系统性综述中,我们评估了血压升高与未固定期间动脉瘤再出血之间的关系。我们检索了从开始到 2024 年 3 月 8 日的 MEDLINE、Embase + Embase Classic 和 CENTRAL。我们纳入了针对成人动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者的研究,这些研究至少报告了一次无保障期间的血压测量结果以及与再出血相关性的测量结果。研究结果按血压阈值、效应测量和混杂因素调整进行了分层。对每一组进行了单独的荟萃分析。我们的搜索发现了 5,209 篇引文。经过筛选,15 项研究被纳入我们的综述。所有研究均为观察性设计,存在中度或高度偏倚风险。对未经调整的结果进行的 Meta 分析显示,不同收缩压 (SBP) 阈值的结果不一:SBP > 140 mm Hg,未经调整的几率比(uOR)为 1.03(95% 置信区间 [CI] 0.55-1.93;I2 = 66%);SBP > 160 mm Hg,uOR 为 3.35(95% CI 1.44-7.81; I2 = 83%);SBP > 180 mm Hg,uOR 1.52 (95% CI 0.40-5.81; I2 = 89%);SBP > 200 mm Hg,uOR 7.99 (95% CI 3.60-17.72; I2 = 0%)。只有在 SBP > 160 mm Hg 时才能对调整后的结果进行 Meta 分析;调整后的危险比为 1.13 (95% CI 0.98-1.31; I2 = 0%)。根据 "建议、评估、发展和评价分级 "工具的评估,证据的总体质量被评为极低。基于极低质量的证据,我们的系统性综述未能确定未固定期间血压升高与动脉瘤再出血风险增加之间是否存在关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elevated Blood Pressure and Culprit Aneurysm Rebleeding During the Unsecured Period of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review.

In aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, rebleeding prior to securing the culprit aneurysm leads to significant morbidity and mortality. Elevated blood pressure has been identified as a possible risk factor. In this systematic review, we evaluated the association between elevated blood pressure and aneurysm rebleeding during the unsecured period. We searched MEDLINE, Embase + Embase Classic, and CENTRAL, from inception to March 8th, 2024. We included studies of adults with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage reporting at least one blood pressure measurement during the unsecured period and a measure of association with rebleeding. Results were stratified by blood pressure thresholds, effect measure, and adjustment for confounding. Separate meta-analyses were performed for each of these groups. Our search identified 5,209 citations. After screening, 15 studies were included in our review. All studies were observational in design and at moderate or high risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the unadjusted results produced mixed findings across the systolic blood pressure (SBP) thresholds: SBP > 140 mm Hg, unadjusted odds ratio (uOR) 1.03 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.93; I2 = 66%); SBP > 160 mm Hg, uOR 3.35 (95% CI 1.44-7.81; I2 = 83%); SBP > 180 mm Hg, uOR 1.52 (95% CI 0.40-5.81; I2 = 89%); and SBP > 200 mm Hg, uOR 7.99 (95% CI 3.60-17.72; I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis of adjusted results was only possible at an SBP > 160 mm Hg; adjusted hazard ratio 1.13 (95% CI 0.98-1.31; I2 = 0%). The overall quality of evidence as assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations tool was rated as very low. Based on very low quality evidence, our systematic review failed to determine whether there is an association between elevated blood pressure during the unsecured period and increased risk of culprit aneurysm rebleeding.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信