{"title":"奥比妥珠单抗与利妥昔单抗用于治疗难治性原发性膜性肾病。","authors":"Mingyue Xu, Yifeng Wang, Meihe Wu, Ruiying Chen, Wenqian Zhao, Mingxin Li, Chuan-Ming Hao, Qionghong Xie","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfae230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab has been shown effective in patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (GC + CTX) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), but the response rates remain limited. Compared with rituximab, obinutuzumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater B-cell depletion capacity. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of obinutuzumab compared with rituximab in treating patients with refractory primary membranous nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2024, and included adult patients with primary membranous nephropathy who met the following criteria: (i) resistance to GC + CTX and/or CNI regimens, (ii) dependence on CNIs or (iii) relapse within 1 year after CTX discontinuation. The patients subsequently received either obinutuzumab or rituximab. The primary endpoint was treatment response, which was defined as overall remission of nephrotic syndrome with no need for rescue therapy after obinutuzumab versus rituximab treatment. The secondary measures included immunological remission and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 51 participants, 20 received obinutuzumab and 31 received rituximab. The response rate was significantly greater in patients receiving obinutuzumab than in those receiving rituximab (90.0% vs 38.7%, P < .001) during a follow-up period of 24 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-34] months. Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis also revealed the superior effectiveness of obinutuzumab (P < .001). Immunological remission rates were higher in patients receiving obinutuzumab at both 3 months (75.0% vs 20.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (87.5% vs 21.4%, P < .001). The safety profiles of the two treatments were comparable. Among the 19 non-responders treated with rituximab, 10 subsequently received obinutuzumab, and 8 achieved remission during a follow-up period of 20.0 (IQR 18.5-22.3) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study suggests that obinutuzumab is an effective treatment option for patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to GC + CTX, CNI and rituximab regimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"978-986"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obinutuzumab versus rituximab for the treatment of refractory primary membranous nephropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Mingyue Xu, Yifeng Wang, Meihe Wu, Ruiying Chen, Wenqian Zhao, Mingxin Li, Chuan-Ming Hao, Qionghong Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfae230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab has been shown effective in patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (GC + CTX) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), but the response rates remain limited. Compared with rituximab, obinutuzumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater B-cell depletion capacity. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of obinutuzumab compared with rituximab in treating patients with refractory primary membranous nephropathy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2024, and included adult patients with primary membranous nephropathy who met the following criteria: (i) resistance to GC + CTX and/or CNI regimens, (ii) dependence on CNIs or (iii) relapse within 1 year after CTX discontinuation. The patients subsequently received either obinutuzumab or rituximab. The primary endpoint was treatment response, which was defined as overall remission of nephrotic syndrome with no need for rescue therapy after obinutuzumab versus rituximab treatment. The secondary measures included immunological remission and safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 51 participants, 20 received obinutuzumab and 31 received rituximab. The response rate was significantly greater in patients receiving obinutuzumab than in those receiving rituximab (90.0% vs 38.7%, P < .001) during a follow-up period of 24 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-34] months. Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis also revealed the superior effectiveness of obinutuzumab (P < .001). Immunological remission rates were higher in patients receiving obinutuzumab at both 3 months (75.0% vs 20.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (87.5% vs 21.4%, P < .001). The safety profiles of the two treatments were comparable. Among the 19 non-responders treated with rituximab, 10 subsequently received obinutuzumab, and 8 achieved remission during a follow-up period of 20.0 (IQR 18.5-22.3) months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This retrospective study suggests that obinutuzumab is an effective treatment option for patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to GC + CTX, CNI and rituximab regimens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"978-986\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae230\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae230","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:利妥昔单抗对糖皮质激素加环磷酰胺(GC+CTX)或钙神经蛋白抑制剂(CNIs)难治性原发性膜性肾病患者有效,但反应率仍然有限。与利妥昔单抗相比,奥比妥珠单抗是一种人源化的抗CD20单克隆抗体,具有更强的B细胞消耗能力。本研究旨在探讨与利妥昔单抗相比,奥比妥珠单抗治疗难治性原发性膜性肾病患者的疗效:复旦大学附属华山医院于2015年1月1日至2024年7月31日期间开展了一项回顾性研究,纳入了符合以下标准的原发性膜性肾病成人患者:1)对GC+CTX和/或钙神经蛋白抑制剂(CNI)方案耐药;2)依赖CNI;或3)停用CTX后1年内复发。患者随后接受奥比妥珠单抗或利妥昔单抗治疗。主要终点是治疗反应,即在接受奥比妥珠单抗或利妥昔单抗治疗后,肾病综合征总体缓解且无需接受抢救治疗。次要指标包括免疫学缓解和安全性:在51名参与者中,20人接受了奥比妥珠单抗治疗,31人接受了利妥昔单抗治疗。接受奥比妥珠单抗治疗的患者的应答率明显高于接受利妥昔单抗治疗的患者(90.0% vs. 38.7%,p):这项回顾性研究表明,对于GC+CTX、CNI和利妥昔单抗方案难治的原发性膜性肾病患者,奥比妥珠单抗是一种有效的治疗方案。
Obinutuzumab versus rituximab for the treatment of refractory primary membranous nephropathy.
Background: Rituximab has been shown effective in patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to glucocorticoids plus cyclophosphamide (GC + CTX) or calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), but the response rates remain limited. Compared with rituximab, obinutuzumab is a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with greater B-cell depletion capacity. This study was performed to investigate the effectiveness of obinutuzumab compared with rituximab in treating patients with refractory primary membranous nephropathy.
Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between 1 January 2015 and 31 July 2024, and included adult patients with primary membranous nephropathy who met the following criteria: (i) resistance to GC + CTX and/or CNI regimens, (ii) dependence on CNIs or (iii) relapse within 1 year after CTX discontinuation. The patients subsequently received either obinutuzumab or rituximab. The primary endpoint was treatment response, which was defined as overall remission of nephrotic syndrome with no need for rescue therapy after obinutuzumab versus rituximab treatment. The secondary measures included immunological remission and safety profiles.
Results: Among the 51 participants, 20 received obinutuzumab and 31 received rituximab. The response rate was significantly greater in patients receiving obinutuzumab than in those receiving rituximab (90.0% vs 38.7%, P < .001) during a follow-up period of 24 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-34] months. Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis also revealed the superior effectiveness of obinutuzumab (P < .001). Immunological remission rates were higher in patients receiving obinutuzumab at both 3 months (75.0% vs 20.0%, P < .001) and 6 months (87.5% vs 21.4%, P < .001). The safety profiles of the two treatments were comparable. Among the 19 non-responders treated with rituximab, 10 subsequently received obinutuzumab, and 8 achieved remission during a follow-up period of 20.0 (IQR 18.5-22.3) months.
Conclusion: This retrospective study suggests that obinutuzumab is an effective treatment option for patients with primary membranous nephropathy refractory to GC + CTX, CNI and rituximab regimens.
期刊介绍:
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review.
Print ISSN: 0931-0509.