是什么影响了临床教育工作者的教学动机?基于自我决定理论的 BEME 系统回顾与框架综述:BEME Review No.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166
Cesar Orsini, Rintaro Imafuku, Barbara Jennings, Adam Neufeld, Jorge Tricio, Rashmi A Kusurkar
{"title":"是什么影响了临床教育工作者的教学动机?基于自我决定理论的 BEME 系统回顾与框架综述:BEME Review No.","authors":"Cesar Orsini, Rintaro Imafuku, Barbara Jennings, Adam Neufeld, Jorge Tricio, Rashmi A Kusurkar","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professions learners are taught by full-time university faculty and by clinicians who teach alongside their clinical practice. This distributed healthcare education model ensures high-quality education but is at risk due to high learner demand, shortage of educators, and economic pressures. Understanding what factors influence clinical educators' motivation to teach may contribute to the model's sustainability and educator retention. The present review therefore aimed to systematically search and synthesise factors influencing clinical educators' motivation to teach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple databases, relevant journals, and the grey literature were searched for studies reporting on clinical educators' motivation to teach. Data were analysed using a framework synthesis method, based on self-determination theory's amotivation (e.g. disinterest or unachievable challenges), controlled (e.g. interest in rewards or pressure avoidance), and autonomous (e.g. personal importance and interest) concepts, and nested within a motivation from 'above' (i.e. interactions with stakeholders and societal expectations), 'within' (i.e. personal beliefs and personality dispositions), and 'below' (i.e. perception on learners' motivation and engagement) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were included, published between 1998 and 2022, which reported on educators from diverse disciplines and settings. Educators reported autonomous over controlled motivation to teach, favouring enjoyment, connectedness, professional development, feeling valued for their teaching efforts, and altruistic reasons to teach, over being motivated by incentives and rewards. These results are presented in relation to their origin, as factors influencing motivation 'above', 'within', and 'below'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study have important implications for the development of contextual strategies to optimise learning/work environments and maximise autonomous reasons to teach, enhancing clinical educators' job satisfaction and retention.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"779-787"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What influences clinical educators' motivation to teach? A BEME systematic review and framework synthesis based on self-determination theory: BEME Review No. 90.\",\"authors\":\"Cesar Orsini, Rintaro Imafuku, Barbara Jennings, Adam Neufeld, Jorge Tricio, Rashmi A Kusurkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health professions learners are taught by full-time university faculty and by clinicians who teach alongside their clinical practice. This distributed healthcare education model ensures high-quality education but is at risk due to high learner demand, shortage of educators, and economic pressures. Understanding what factors influence clinical educators' motivation to teach may contribute to the model's sustainability and educator retention. The present review therefore aimed to systematically search and synthesise factors influencing clinical educators' motivation to teach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple databases, relevant journals, and the grey literature were searched for studies reporting on clinical educators' motivation to teach. Data were analysed using a framework synthesis method, based on self-determination theory's amotivation (e.g. disinterest or unachievable challenges), controlled (e.g. interest in rewards or pressure avoidance), and autonomous (e.g. personal importance and interest) concepts, and nested within a motivation from 'above' (i.e. interactions with stakeholders and societal expectations), 'within' (i.e. personal beliefs and personality dispositions), and 'below' (i.e. perception on learners' motivation and engagement) framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine studies were included, published between 1998 and 2022, which reported on educators from diverse disciplines and settings. Educators reported autonomous over controlled motivation to teach, favouring enjoyment, connectedness, professional development, feeling valued for their teaching efforts, and altruistic reasons to teach, over being motivated by incentives and rewards. These results are presented in relation to their origin, as factors influencing motivation 'above', 'within', and 'below'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results from this study have important implications for the development of contextual strategies to optimise learning/work environments and maximise autonomous reasons to teach, enhancing clinical educators' job satisfaction and retention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18643,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"779-787\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Teacher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2412166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生保健专业的学生由大学全职教师和临床医生授课,临床医生在临床实践的同时进行教学。这种分布式医疗保健教育模式确保了高质量的教育,但由于学员需求量大、教育工作者短缺以及经济压力,这种模式面临着风险。了解哪些因素会影响临床教育工作者的教学动力,可能有助于该模式的可持续性和教育工作者的留任。因此,本综述旨在系统地搜索和归纳影响临床教育工作者教学动力的因素:方法: 我们在多个数据库、相关期刊和灰色文献中搜索了有关临床教育工作者教学动机的研究报告。根据自我决定理论的非激励(如不感兴趣或无法实现的挑战)、受控(如对奖励感兴趣或逃避压力)和自主(如个人重要性和兴趣)概念,采用框架综合法对数据进行了分析。结果:共纳入了 29 项研究,这些研究均已发表:结果:共纳入了 29 项研究,这些研究发表于 1998 年至 2022 年之间,报告的对象是来自不同学科和环境的教育工作者。据报告,教育工作者的自主教学动机高于受控教学动机,他们更倾向于享受、联系、专业发展、感觉自己的教学努力得到了重视,以及利他主义的教学动机,而不是激励和奖励的动机。这些结果将根据其来源,作为影响 "上层"、"内部 "和 "下层 "动机的因素进行阐述:本研究的结果对制定优化学习/工作环境和最大化自主教学动机的情境策略、提高临床教育工作者的工作满意度和留任率具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What influences clinical educators' motivation to teach? A BEME systematic review and framework synthesis based on self-determination theory: BEME Review No. 90.

Background: Health professions learners are taught by full-time university faculty and by clinicians who teach alongside their clinical practice. This distributed healthcare education model ensures high-quality education but is at risk due to high learner demand, shortage of educators, and economic pressures. Understanding what factors influence clinical educators' motivation to teach may contribute to the model's sustainability and educator retention. The present review therefore aimed to systematically search and synthesise factors influencing clinical educators' motivation to teach.

Methods: Multiple databases, relevant journals, and the grey literature were searched for studies reporting on clinical educators' motivation to teach. Data were analysed using a framework synthesis method, based on self-determination theory's amotivation (e.g. disinterest or unachievable challenges), controlled (e.g. interest in rewards or pressure avoidance), and autonomous (e.g. personal importance and interest) concepts, and nested within a motivation from 'above' (i.e. interactions with stakeholders and societal expectations), 'within' (i.e. personal beliefs and personality dispositions), and 'below' (i.e. perception on learners' motivation and engagement) framework.

Results: Twenty-nine studies were included, published between 1998 and 2022, which reported on educators from diverse disciplines and settings. Educators reported autonomous over controlled motivation to teach, favouring enjoyment, connectedness, professional development, feeling valued for their teaching efforts, and altruistic reasons to teach, over being motivated by incentives and rewards. These results are presented in relation to their origin, as factors influencing motivation 'above', 'within', and 'below'.

Conclusions: Results from this study have important implications for the development of contextual strategies to optimise learning/work environments and maximise autonomous reasons to teach, enhancing clinical educators' job satisfaction and retention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信