重新审视 B 群链球菌噬菌体的分型系统:在阿根廷 B 群链球菌分离物噬菌体检测和分类中的应用。

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Veronica Kovacec, Sabrina Di Gregorio, Mario Pajon, Chiara Crestani, Tomás Poklepovich, Josefina Campos, Uzma Basit Khan, Stephen D Bentley, Dorota Jamrozy, Marta Mollerach, Laura Bonofiglio
{"title":"重新审视 B 群链球菌噬菌体的分型系统:在阿根廷 B 群链球菌分离物噬菌体检测和分类中的应用。","authors":"Veronica Kovacec, Sabrina Di Gregorio, Mario Pajon, Chiara Crestani, Tomás Poklepovich, Josefina Campos, Uzma Basit Khan, Stephen D Bentley, Dorota Jamrozy, Marta Mollerach, Laura Bonofiglio","doi":"10.1099/mgen.0.001297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) causes severe infections in neonates and adults with comorbidities. Prophages have been reported to contribute to GBS evolution and pathogenicity. However, no studies are available to date on the presence and diversity of prophages in GBS isolates from humans in South America. This study provides insights into the prophage content of 365 GBS isolates collected from clinical samples in the context of an Argentinean multicentric study. Using whole-genome sequence data, we implemented two previously proposed methods for prophage typing: a PCR approach (carried out <i>in silico</i>) coupled with a blastx-based method to classify prophages based on their prophage group and integrase type, respectively. We manually searched the genomes and identified 325 prophages. However, only 80% of prophages could be accurately categorized with the previous approaches. Integration of phylogenetic analysis, prophage group and integrase type allowed for all to be classified into 19 prophage types, which correlated with GBS clonal complex grouping. The revised prophage typing approach was additionally improved by using a blastn search after enriching the database with ten new genes for prophage group classification combined with the existing integrase typing method. This modified and integrated typing system was applied to the analysis of 615 GBS genomes (365 GBS from Argentina and 250 from public databases), which revealed 29 prophage types, including two novel integrase subtypes. Their characterization and comparative analysis revealed major differences in the lysogeny and replication modules. Genes related to bacterial fitness, virulence or adaptation to stressful environments were detected in all prophage types. Considering prophage prevalence, distribution and their association with bacterial virulence, it is important to study their role in GBS epidemiology. In this context, we propose the use of an improved and integrated prophage typing system suitable for rapid phage detection and classification with little computational processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":18487,"journal":{"name":"Microbial Genomics","volume":"10 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting typing systems for group B <i>Streptococcus</i> prophages: an application in prophage detection and classification in group B <i>Streptococcus</i> isolates from Argentina.\",\"authors\":\"Veronica Kovacec, Sabrina Di Gregorio, Mario Pajon, Chiara Crestani, Tomás Poklepovich, Josefina Campos, Uzma Basit Khan, Stephen D Bentley, Dorota Jamrozy, Marta Mollerach, Laura Bonofiglio\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/mgen.0.001297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) causes severe infections in neonates and adults with comorbidities. Prophages have been reported to contribute to GBS evolution and pathogenicity. However, no studies are available to date on the presence and diversity of prophages in GBS isolates from humans in South America. This study provides insights into the prophage content of 365 GBS isolates collected from clinical samples in the context of an Argentinean multicentric study. Using whole-genome sequence data, we implemented two previously proposed methods for prophage typing: a PCR approach (carried out <i>in silico</i>) coupled with a blastx-based method to classify prophages based on their prophage group and integrase type, respectively. We manually searched the genomes and identified 325 prophages. However, only 80% of prophages could be accurately categorized with the previous approaches. Integration of phylogenetic analysis, prophage group and integrase type allowed for all to be classified into 19 prophage types, which correlated with GBS clonal complex grouping. The revised prophage typing approach was additionally improved by using a blastn search after enriching the database with ten new genes for prophage group classification combined with the existing integrase typing method. This modified and integrated typing system was applied to the analysis of 615 GBS genomes (365 GBS from Argentina and 250 from public databases), which revealed 29 prophage types, including two novel integrase subtypes. Their characterization and comparative analysis revealed major differences in the lysogeny and replication modules. Genes related to bacterial fitness, virulence or adaptation to stressful environments were detected in all prophage types. Considering prophage prevalence, distribution and their association with bacterial virulence, it is important to study their role in GBS epidemiology. In this context, we propose the use of an improved and integrated prophage typing system suitable for rapid phage detection and classification with little computational processing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbial Genomics\",\"volume\":\"10 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11485964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbial Genomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbial Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/mgen.0.001297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

B 组链球菌(GBS)会导致患有合并症的新生儿和成人发生严重感染。据报道,噬菌体有助于 GBS 的进化和致病性。然而,迄今为止还没有关于南美洲人类 GBS 分离物中噬菌体的存在和多样性的研究。本研究通过阿根廷的一项多中心研究,对从临床样本中收集到的 365 株 GBS 分离物中的噬菌体含量进行了深入研究。利用全基因组序列数据,我们采用了之前提出的两种噬菌体分型方法:PCR方法(在硅中进行)和基于blastx的方法,分别根据噬菌体群和整合酶类型对噬菌体进行分类。我们人工搜索了基因组,确定了 325 个噬菌体。然而,用以前的方法只能对 80% 的噬菌体进行准确分类。将系统发育分析、噬菌体组别和整合酶类型整合在一起,可将所有噬菌体分为 19 个类型,这与 GBS 克隆复合体分组相关。在使用十个新基因丰富数据库后,结合现有的整合酶分型方法,对修订后的噬菌体分型方法进行了进一步改进。这一修改后的综合分型系统被用于分析 615 个 GBS 基因组(365 个来自阿根廷,250 个来自公共数据库),结果发现了 29 种噬菌体类型,包括两种新型整合酶亚型。对它们的特征描述和比较分析表明,溶菌酶和复制模块存在重大差异。在所有噬菌体类型中都检测到了与细菌适应性、毒性或对压力环境的适应性有关的基因。考虑到噬菌体的流行、分布及其与细菌毒力的关联,研究它们在 GBS 流行病学中的作用非常重要。在这种情况下,我们建议使用一种改进的综合噬菌体分型系统,该系统只需少量计算处理即可实现噬菌体的快速检测和分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting typing systems for group B Streptococcus prophages: an application in prophage detection and classification in group B Streptococcus isolates from Argentina.

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) causes severe infections in neonates and adults with comorbidities. Prophages have been reported to contribute to GBS evolution and pathogenicity. However, no studies are available to date on the presence and diversity of prophages in GBS isolates from humans in South America. This study provides insights into the prophage content of 365 GBS isolates collected from clinical samples in the context of an Argentinean multicentric study. Using whole-genome sequence data, we implemented two previously proposed methods for prophage typing: a PCR approach (carried out in silico) coupled with a blastx-based method to classify prophages based on their prophage group and integrase type, respectively. We manually searched the genomes and identified 325 prophages. However, only 80% of prophages could be accurately categorized with the previous approaches. Integration of phylogenetic analysis, prophage group and integrase type allowed for all to be classified into 19 prophage types, which correlated with GBS clonal complex grouping. The revised prophage typing approach was additionally improved by using a blastn search after enriching the database with ten new genes for prophage group classification combined with the existing integrase typing method. This modified and integrated typing system was applied to the analysis of 615 GBS genomes (365 GBS from Argentina and 250 from public databases), which revealed 29 prophage types, including two novel integrase subtypes. Their characterization and comparative analysis revealed major differences in the lysogeny and replication modules. Genes related to bacterial fitness, virulence or adaptation to stressful environments were detected in all prophage types. Considering prophage prevalence, distribution and their association with bacterial virulence, it is important to study their role in GBS epidemiology. In this context, we propose the use of an improved and integrated prophage typing system suitable for rapid phage detection and classification with little computational processing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbial Genomics
Microbial Genomics Medicine-Epidemiology
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.60%
发文量
153
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Microbial Genomics (MGen) is a fully open access, mandatory open data and peer-reviewed journal publishing high-profile original research on archaea, bacteria, microbial eukaryotes and viruses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信