Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland
{"title":"与仰卧位相比,侧卧位从前方暴露 L4-5 椎间盘可保持安全性。","authors":"Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland","doi":"10.21037/jss-24-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 <i>vs.</i> 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% <i>vs.</i> 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% <i>vs.</i> 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.</p>","PeriodicalId":17131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine surgery","volume":"10 3","pages":"333-343"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467285/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.\",\"authors\":\"Nam V Huynh, J Alex Thomas, Leon Eisen, Domenic Robinson, Mark Medley, Aaron J Buckland\",\"doi\":\"10.21037/jss-24-34\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 <i>vs.</i> 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% <i>vs.</i> 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% <i>vs.</i> 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% <i>vs.</i> 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% <i>vs.</i> 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"333-343\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11467285/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-34\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/jss-24-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:腹膜后腰椎前方暴露术传统上是在仰卧位(SUP)下进行的,以进入L4-L5和L5-S1椎间盘间隙,因为侧卧位手术可能不安全。然而,随着侧卧位单体位手术的发展,人们主张在侧卧位(LAT)下进行L4-5椎间盘前方入路手术。虽然L5-S1侧卧位入路已被详细描述,但还没有关于L4-5侧卧位前方入路的系列文章发表。本研究旨在评估与 SUP 相比,LAT 下 L4-5 椎间盘水平腰椎前路暴露的安全性:多中心回顾性研究根据患者的体位将接受前路腹膜后腰椎暴露涉及L4-5椎间盘水平的患者分为:(I)LAT或(II)SUP:结果:共纳入 140 例患者,其中 65 例为 LAT 患者,75 例为 SUP 患者。暴露了 238 个前椎水平,其中 113 个在侧卧位进行,125 个在仰卧位进行。平均前路融合水平相似(1.74 对 1.67 水平,P=0.37)。接受额外侧位腰椎椎体间融合术(LLIF)(21.50% 对 0.00%,Pvs. 6.70%,P=0.01)和计划分期手术(21.50% 对 6.70%,P=0.01)的 LAT 患者显著增多。术中并发症发生率相似(3.10% vs. 4.00%,P=0.77),包括相似的血管损伤率(1.50% vs. 0.00%,P=0.28)和无内脏损伤。LAT 组的术后并发症(15.40% 对 38.70%,P=0.002)明显较低,但两组的主要并发症(6.20% 对 13.30%,P=0.16)相似。发生术后回肠梗阻的 LAT 患者较少(0.00% 对 6.70%,P=0.03)。两组患者在30天内(3.10% vs. 6.70%,P=0.33)和90天内(3.10% vs. 10.70%,P=0.09)的再次手术率相似:结论:尽管侧卧位的病例复杂程度更高,但与仰卧位相比,LAT腰椎前路暴露L4-5椎间盘是安全的。
Lateral decubitus anterior exposure of the L4-5 disc maintains safety compared with supine positioning.
Background: Anterior retroperitoneal lumbar spinal exposure has traditionally been performed in the supine position (SUP) to access the L4-L5 and L5-S1 disc spaces where lateral approaches may be unsafe. However, advancements in lateral single position surgery have resulted in advocacy for anterior L4-5 disc access in the lateral decubitus position (LAT). While L5-S1 access in the lateral position is well-described, no series of L4-5 anterior access in the lateral position has been published. The study aims to evaluate the safety of anterior lumbar exposure at the L4-5 disc level in the LAT compared to the SUP.
Methods: A multi-center retrospective study of patients who underwent anterior retroperitoneal lumbar exposure involving the L4-5 disc level were classified according to patient positioning: (I) LAT or (II) SUP.
Results: One hundred and forty patients were included, of which 65 LAT and 75 SUP patients. Two hundred and thirty-eight anterior levels were exposed, including 113 levels performed in lateral and 125 levels in supine. Mean anterior levels fused was similar (1.74 vs. 1.67 levels, P=0.37). Significantly more LAT patients underwent additional lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) (21.50% vs. 0.00%, P<0.001). A larger proportion of LAT patients underwent surgery for spinal deformity (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01) and planned staged procedures (21.50% vs. 6.70%, P=0.01). Intraoperative complication rates were similar (3.10% vs. 4.00%, P=0.77), including similar vascular injury rates (1.50% vs. 0.00%, P=0.28) and no visceral injury. Postoperative complications (15.40% vs. 38.70%, P=0.002) were significantly lower in the LAT group, however major complications (6.20% vs. 13.30%, P=0.16) were similar between groups. Fewer LAT patients experienced postoperative ileus (0.00% vs. 6.70%, P=0.03). The rate of reoperation within 30 days (3.10% vs. 6.70%, P=0.33) and 90 days (3.10% vs. 10.70%, P=0.09) were similar between groups.
Conclusions: Anterior lumbar spinal exposure of the L4-5 disc in the LAT is safe compared to supine exposure, despite higher case complexity in the lateral position.