支持英国未得到充分服务社区的肌肉骨骼疾病患者参与体育活动:现实主义综合与 Q 方法研究》。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Alice Berry, Terence Brady, Natasha Bradley, Nicky Harris, Caroline Flurey, Faatihah Niyi-Odumosu, Emma Dures, Nicola Walsh
{"title":"支持英国未得到充分服务社区的肌肉骨骼疾病患者参与体育活动:现实主义综合与 Q 方法研究》。","authors":"Alice Berry, Terence Brady, Natasha Bradley, Nicky Harris, Caroline Flurey, Faatihah Niyi-Odumosu, Emma Dures, Nicola Walsh","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2024-0181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United Kingdom, 20 million individuals suffer from a musculoskeletal condition, for which physical activity (PA) is a core treatment. Minority ethnic communities experience a disproportionate impact, experiencing higher levels of pain and engaging in less PA. Research has identified various factors that affect their participation in PA, including lack of access to support, limited knowledge of resources, language barriers, fear of racial harassment while exercising, and insufficient communication/information from healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project adopted a realist perspective, aiming to understand \"what works, in which circumstances, and for whom?\" The project had 4 steps: (1) defining review scope with stakeholders; (2) searching and extracting literature, creation of initial program theories; (3) refining/validating initial program theories with stakeholders; and (4) adopting Q-methodology to highlight priority areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 papers were included. Three program theories were identified: (1) Lack of initial access to health service support; (2) Nature of musculoskeletal self-management support-the importance of the therapeutic relationship and value of shared conversations; and (3) Accessible long-term support for PA engagement. The Q-sort exercise highlighted priority areas: (1) complex booking procedures and inadequate translation services, (2) time constraints impact effective patient-centered care, (3) dismissive attitudes/mismatched expectations impact shared decision making, (4) rebuilding trust to strengthen therapeutic relationships, (5) cultural relevance in developing therapeutic relationships, and (6) clinician recommended PA opportunities increase knowledge of PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings shed light on inequities across the UK's musculoskeletal pathways, specifically in relation to PA engagement. This points toward priority areas for future research and interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting People With Musculoskeletal Conditions From Underserved Communities in the United Kingdom to Engage With Physical Activity: A Realist Synthesis and Q-Methodology Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alice Berry, Terence Brady, Natasha Bradley, Nicky Harris, Caroline Flurey, Faatihah Niyi-Odumosu, Emma Dures, Nicola Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jpah.2024-0181\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the United Kingdom, 20 million individuals suffer from a musculoskeletal condition, for which physical activity (PA) is a core treatment. Minority ethnic communities experience a disproportionate impact, experiencing higher levels of pain and engaging in less PA. Research has identified various factors that affect their participation in PA, including lack of access to support, limited knowledge of resources, language barriers, fear of racial harassment while exercising, and insufficient communication/information from healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This project adopted a realist perspective, aiming to understand \\\"what works, in which circumstances, and for whom?\\\" The project had 4 steps: (1) defining review scope with stakeholders; (2) searching and extracting literature, creation of initial program theories; (3) refining/validating initial program theories with stakeholders; and (4) adopting Q-methodology to highlight priority areas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>17 papers were included. Three program theories were identified: (1) Lack of initial access to health service support; (2) Nature of musculoskeletal self-management support-the importance of the therapeutic relationship and value of shared conversations; and (3) Accessible long-term support for PA engagement. The Q-sort exercise highlighted priority areas: (1) complex booking procedures and inadequate translation services, (2) time constraints impact effective patient-centered care, (3) dismissive attitudes/mismatched expectations impact shared decision making, (4) rebuilding trust to strengthen therapeutic relationships, (5) cultural relevance in developing therapeutic relationships, and (6) clinician recommended PA opportunities increase knowledge of PA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings shed light on inequities across the UK's musculoskeletal pathways, specifically in relation to PA engagement. This points toward priority areas for future research and interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of physical activity & health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0181\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2024-0181","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在英国,有 2000 万人患有肌肉骨骼疾病,而体育锻炼(PA)是治疗这种疾病的核心方法。少数民族社区受到的影响尤为严重,他们的疼痛程度更高,参与体育锻炼的次数更少。研究发现了影响他们参与体育锻炼的各种因素,包括缺乏支持、对资源的了解有限、语言障碍、担心锻炼时受到种族骚扰,以及来自医疗保健专业人员的沟通/信息不足:该项目采用现实主义视角,旨在了解 "什么有效,在什么情况下有效,对谁有效?该项目分为 4 个步骤:(1) 与利益相关者共同确定审查范围;(2) 搜索和提取文献,创建初步的计划理论;(3) 与利益相关者共同完善/验证初步的计划理论;(4) 采用 Q 方法突出重点领域:结果:共收录了 17 篇论文。确定了三个计划理论:(1) 缺乏获得医疗服务支持的初始途径;(2) 肌肉骨骼自我管理支持的性质--治疗关系的重要性和共同对话的价值;以及 (3) 可获得的长期参与 PA 支持。Q-sort 活动强调了优先领域:(1)复杂的预约程序和翻译服务不足;(2)时间限制影响了以患者为中心的有效护理;(3)轻视态度/不匹配的期望影响了共同决策;(4)重建信任以加强治疗关系;(5)发展治疗关系的文化相关性;以及(6)临床医生推荐的 PA 机会增加了对 PA 的了解:我们的研究结果揭示了英国肌肉骨骼治疗过程中存在的不公平现象,特别是在参与体育锻炼方面。这指明了未来研究和干预的优先领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supporting People With Musculoskeletal Conditions From Underserved Communities in the United Kingdom to Engage With Physical Activity: A Realist Synthesis and Q-Methodology Study.

Background: In the United Kingdom, 20 million individuals suffer from a musculoskeletal condition, for which physical activity (PA) is a core treatment. Minority ethnic communities experience a disproportionate impact, experiencing higher levels of pain and engaging in less PA. Research has identified various factors that affect their participation in PA, including lack of access to support, limited knowledge of resources, language barriers, fear of racial harassment while exercising, and insufficient communication/information from healthcare professionals.

Methods: This project adopted a realist perspective, aiming to understand "what works, in which circumstances, and for whom?" The project had 4 steps: (1) defining review scope with stakeholders; (2) searching and extracting literature, creation of initial program theories; (3) refining/validating initial program theories with stakeholders; and (4) adopting Q-methodology to highlight priority areas.

Results: 17 papers were included. Three program theories were identified: (1) Lack of initial access to health service support; (2) Nature of musculoskeletal self-management support-the importance of the therapeutic relationship and value of shared conversations; and (3) Accessible long-term support for PA engagement. The Q-sort exercise highlighted priority areas: (1) complex booking procedures and inadequate translation services, (2) time constraints impact effective patient-centered care, (3) dismissive attitudes/mismatched expectations impact shared decision making, (4) rebuilding trust to strengthen therapeutic relationships, (5) cultural relevance in developing therapeutic relationships, and (6) clinician recommended PA opportunities increase knowledge of PA.

Conclusions: Our findings shed light on inequities across the UK's musculoskeletal pathways, specifically in relation to PA engagement. This points toward priority areas for future research and interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信