术前肝内门静脉分类系统在指导 EHPVO 患儿术前手术决策和预测中肾旁路术后低血压效应方面的有效性。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Xiaopan Chang, Lu Liu, Jieqin Wang, Qifeng Liang, Jiankun Liang, Zhenyin Liu, Zhe Wen
{"title":"术前肝内门静脉分类系统在指导 EHPVO 患儿术前手术决策和预测中肾旁路术后低血压效应方面的有效性。","authors":"Xiaopan Chang, Lu Liu, Jieqin Wang, Qifeng Liang, Jiankun Liang, Zhenyin Liu, Zhe Wen","doi":"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The categorization of intrahepatic portal venous system (IHPS) patterns using wedged hepatic venous portography (WHVP) has proven to be an effective tool in the preoperative evaluation of Rex recessus and in identifying pediatric patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) who are suitable for meso-Rex bypass (MRB). Despite this classification system being proposed a decade ago, its clinical application remains underutilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study of 182 children with EHPVO was conducted between October 2014 and July 2023 when MRB was attempted. Data on demographics, etiology, imaging examinations, procedures, and follow-up were collected for 161 patients included. Two interventional radiologists used deVille's method to classify patients into types A to E based on WHVP imaging, with interobserver agreement analyzed. Associations between IHPS patterns and surgical outcomes following MRB were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two radiologists had a high level of agreement on identifying IHPS patterns and suitable patients for MRB. Of the 161 cases, 130 were type A, 10 were type B, 5 were type C, 7 were type D, and 9 were type E. One hundred and forty-five patients with types A, B and C underwent successful MRB, showing feasibility for 90% of patients. Children categorized as types A and B experienced more significant benefits than type C, including intraoperatively decreased portal vein pressure, esophageal/gastric varices relief, decreased portal venous collaterals and a lower rate of bypass occlusion after one year. The surgical outcomes of patients with types A and B were not influenced by the diameter of the Rex recessus as suggested by WHVP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of pediatric patients with EHPVO in mainland China have opportunities to receive successful MRB. There are potential differences in the etiology of Chinese and Western patients. The IHPS classification system aids in guiding preoperative surgical decisions and predicting hypotensive effects after MRB. Type C patients should be carefully chosen for MRB.</p>","PeriodicalId":16733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pediatric surgery","volume":" ","pages":"161990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Preoperative Intrahepatic Portal Venous Classification System in Guiding Preoperative Surgical Decisions and Predicting Hypotensive Effects After Meso-rex Bypass for Children With EHPVO.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaopan Chang, Lu Liu, Jieqin Wang, Qifeng Liang, Jiankun Liang, Zhenyin Liu, Zhe Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161990\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The categorization of intrahepatic portal venous system (IHPS) patterns using wedged hepatic venous portography (WHVP) has proven to be an effective tool in the preoperative evaluation of Rex recessus and in identifying pediatric patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) who are suitable for meso-Rex bypass (MRB). Despite this classification system being proposed a decade ago, its clinical application remains underutilized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective study of 182 children with EHPVO was conducted between October 2014 and July 2023 when MRB was attempted. Data on demographics, etiology, imaging examinations, procedures, and follow-up were collected for 161 patients included. Two interventional radiologists used deVille's method to classify patients into types A to E based on WHVP imaging, with interobserver agreement analyzed. Associations between IHPS patterns and surgical outcomes following MRB were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two radiologists had a high level of agreement on identifying IHPS patterns and suitable patients for MRB. Of the 161 cases, 130 were type A, 10 were type B, 5 were type C, 7 were type D, and 9 were type E. One hundred and forty-five patients with types A, B and C underwent successful MRB, showing feasibility for 90% of patients. Children categorized as types A and B experienced more significant benefits than type C, including intraoperatively decreased portal vein pressure, esophageal/gastric varices relief, decreased portal venous collaterals and a lower rate of bypass occlusion after one year. The surgical outcomes of patients with types A and B were not influenced by the diameter of the Rex recessus as suggested by WHVP.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of pediatric patients with EHPVO in mainland China have opportunities to receive successful MRB. There are potential differences in the etiology of Chinese and Western patients. The IHPS classification system aids in guiding preoperative surgical decisions and predicting hypotensive effects after MRB. Type C patients should be carefully chosen for MRB.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"161990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pediatric surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161990\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pediatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2024.161990","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:使用楔形肝静脉造影术(WHVP)对肝内门静脉系统(IHPS)模式进行分类,已被证明是一种有效的工具,可用于术前评估雷克斯凹陷(Rex recessus),并确定哪些小儿肝外门静脉阻塞(EHPVO)患者适合进行中-雷克斯搭桥术(MRB)。尽管该分类系统早在十年前就已提出,但其临床应用仍然不足:方法:2014 年 10 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,对尝试 MRB 的 182 名 EHPVO 患儿进行了单中心回顾性研究。收集了161名患者的人口统计学、病因学、影像学检查、手术和随访数据。两名介入放射科医生采用德维尔方法,根据 WHVP 成像将患者分为 A 至 E 型,并分析观察者之间的一致性。研究了IHPS模式与MRB术后手术结果之间的关联:结果:两位放射科医生在识别 IHPS 模式和适合 MRB 的患者方面意见高度一致。在161例患者中,130例为A型,10例为B型,5例为C型,7例为D型,9例为E型。A 型和 B 型患儿比 C 型患儿有更明显的获益,包括术中门静脉压力降低、食管/胃静脉曲张缓解、门静脉袢减少以及一年后旁路闭塞率降低。A型和B型患者的手术效果并不受WHVP提出的Rex凹直径的影响:结论:在中国大陆,大多数小儿高血压脑血管畸形患者都有机会成功接受MRB手术。中西方患者的病因可能存在差异。IHPS分类系统有助于指导术前手术决策和预测MRB术后的降压效果。C 型患者应慎重选择 MRB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Preoperative Intrahepatic Portal Venous Classification System in Guiding Preoperative Surgical Decisions and Predicting Hypotensive Effects After Meso-rex Bypass for Children With EHPVO.

Background: The categorization of intrahepatic portal venous system (IHPS) patterns using wedged hepatic venous portography (WHVP) has proven to be an effective tool in the preoperative evaluation of Rex recessus and in identifying pediatric patients with extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO) who are suitable for meso-Rex bypass (MRB). Despite this classification system being proposed a decade ago, its clinical application remains underutilized.

Methods: A single-center retrospective study of 182 children with EHPVO was conducted between October 2014 and July 2023 when MRB was attempted. Data on demographics, etiology, imaging examinations, procedures, and follow-up were collected for 161 patients included. Two interventional radiologists used deVille's method to classify patients into types A to E based on WHVP imaging, with interobserver agreement analyzed. Associations between IHPS patterns and surgical outcomes following MRB were investigated.

Results: Two radiologists had a high level of agreement on identifying IHPS patterns and suitable patients for MRB. Of the 161 cases, 130 were type A, 10 were type B, 5 were type C, 7 were type D, and 9 were type E. One hundred and forty-five patients with types A, B and C underwent successful MRB, showing feasibility for 90% of patients. Children categorized as types A and B experienced more significant benefits than type C, including intraoperatively decreased portal vein pressure, esophageal/gastric varices relief, decreased portal venous collaterals and a lower rate of bypass occlusion after one year. The surgical outcomes of patients with types A and B were not influenced by the diameter of the Rex recessus as suggested by WHVP.

Conclusions: The majority of pediatric patients with EHPVO in mainland China have opportunities to receive successful MRB. There are potential differences in the etiology of Chinese and Western patients. The IHPS classification system aids in guiding preoperative surgical decisions and predicting hypotensive effects after MRB. Type C patients should be carefully chosen for MRB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
569
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The journal presents original contributions as well as a complete international abstracts section and other special departments to provide the most current source of information and references in pediatric surgery. The journal is based on the need to improve the surgical care of infants and children, not only through advances in physiology, pathology and surgical techniques, but also by attention to the unique emotional and physical needs of the young patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信