三阴性乳腺癌卡培他滨辅助用药模式的回顾性评估

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Kun Lin, Elena Michaels, Eric Polley, Peter H O'Donnell, Frederick M Howard, Olwen Hahn, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda, Nan Chen, Heng Yang
{"title":"三阴性乳腺癌卡培他滨辅助用药模式的回顾性评估","authors":"Kun Lin, Elena Michaels, Eric Polley, Peter H O'Donnell, Frederick M Howard, Olwen Hahn, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda, Nan Chen, Heng Yang","doi":"10.1177/10781552241289581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CREATE-X trial demonstrated that adjuvant capecitabine was effective in prolonging survival in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, the recommended dose is generally not well tolerated by the US population. The goal of this study is to analyze dosing patterns in an ethnically diverse cohort to better characterize tolerability and inform future dosing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our single-center retrospective study, we evaluated safety and tolerability in TNBC patients undergoing adjuvant capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint, relative dose intensity (RDI) across eight cycles, was examined alongside subgroup analyses based on age, race, BMI, and initial dose. Secondary endpoints include capecitabine-related side effects and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67 patients who completed adjuvant capecitabine at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) between January 2017 and November 2022 were eligible. The mean RDI across eight cycles of treatment was 60.2% (95% CI: 0.554-0.650). When compared to the CREATE-X trial, the RDI in our population was significantly lower (0.602 vs. 0.787, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in average RDI across eight cycles for patients stratified by age, BMI, race, or initial starting dose. The most frequently reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (73%), diarrhea (27%), and fatigue (22%), consistent with prior studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrates that a significant portion of patients have a lower tolerated dose of capecitabine in comparison to the recommended adjuvant dose. Acknowledging the limitations of our single-center analysis, RDI was not significantly affected by age, race, BMI, or initial starting dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"10781552241289581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective evaluation of adjuvant capecitabine dosing patterns in triple negative breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Kun Lin, Elena Michaels, Eric Polley, Peter H O'Donnell, Frederick M Howard, Olwen Hahn, Gini F Fleming, Rita Nanda, Nan Chen, Heng Yang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552241289581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The CREATE-X trial demonstrated that adjuvant capecitabine was effective in prolonging survival in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, the recommended dose is generally not well tolerated by the US population. The goal of this study is to analyze dosing patterns in an ethnically diverse cohort to better characterize tolerability and inform future dosing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In our single-center retrospective study, we evaluated safety and tolerability in TNBC patients undergoing adjuvant capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint, relative dose intensity (RDI) across eight cycles, was examined alongside subgroup analyses based on age, race, BMI, and initial dose. Secondary endpoints include capecitabine-related side effects and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>67 patients who completed adjuvant capecitabine at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) between January 2017 and November 2022 were eligible. The mean RDI across eight cycles of treatment was 60.2% (95% CI: 0.554-0.650). When compared to the CREATE-X trial, the RDI in our population was significantly lower (0.602 vs. 0.787, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in average RDI across eight cycles for patients stratified by age, BMI, race, or initial starting dose. The most frequently reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (73%), diarrhea (27%), and fatigue (22%), consistent with prior studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data demonstrates that a significant portion of patients have a lower tolerated dose of capecitabine in comparison to the recommended adjuvant dose. Acknowledging the limitations of our single-center analysis, RDI was not significantly affected by age, race, BMI, or initial starting dose.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"10781552241289581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241289581\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552241289581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:CREATE-X试验表明,卡培他滨辅助治疗可有效延长高风险三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的生存期。然而,美国人对推荐剂量的耐受性普遍不佳。本研究的目的是分析不同种族人群的用药模式,以更好地描述耐受性并为未来的用药指南提供参考:在我们的单中心回顾性研究中,我们评估了接受卡培他滨辅助治疗的 TNBC 患者的安全性和耐受性。主要终点是八个周期内的相对剂量强度(RDI),同时根据年龄、种族、体重指数和初始剂量进行亚组分析。次要终点包括与卡培他滨相关的副作用和存活率:2017年1月至2022年11月期间在芝加哥大学医学院(UCM)完成卡培他滨辅助治疗的67名患者符合条件。八个治疗周期的平均RDI为60.2%(95% CI:0.554-0.650)。与 CREATE-X 试验相比,我们人群中的 RDI 明显较低(0.602 vs. 0.787,P 结论:我们的数据表明,与推荐的辅助剂量相比,相当一部分患者对卡培他滨的耐受剂量较低。尽管我们的单中心分析存在局限性,但RDI并未受到年龄、种族、体重指数或初始起始剂量的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective evaluation of adjuvant capecitabine dosing patterns in triple negative breast cancer.

Background: The CREATE-X trial demonstrated that adjuvant capecitabine was effective in prolonging survival in high-risk triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients. However, the recommended dose is generally not well tolerated by the US population. The goal of this study is to analyze dosing patterns in an ethnically diverse cohort to better characterize tolerability and inform future dosing guidelines.

Methods: In our single-center retrospective study, we evaluated safety and tolerability in TNBC patients undergoing adjuvant capecitabine treatment. The primary endpoint, relative dose intensity (RDI) across eight cycles, was examined alongside subgroup analyses based on age, race, BMI, and initial dose. Secondary endpoints include capecitabine-related side effects and survival.

Results: 67 patients who completed adjuvant capecitabine at University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) between January 2017 and November 2022 were eligible. The mean RDI across eight cycles of treatment was 60.2% (95% CI: 0.554-0.650). When compared to the CREATE-X trial, the RDI in our population was significantly lower (0.602 vs. 0.787, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in average RDI across eight cycles for patients stratified by age, BMI, race, or initial starting dose. The most frequently reported adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (73%), diarrhea (27%), and fatigue (22%), consistent with prior studies.

Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that a significant portion of patients have a lower tolerated dose of capecitabine in comparison to the recommended adjuvant dose. Acknowledging the limitations of our single-center analysis, RDI was not significantly affected by age, race, BMI, or initial starting dose.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信