撒哈拉以南非洲地区儿科疼痛自评量表的验证:系统回顾。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Stephen Rineer, Derek Kwakye, Emmanuela E Ambrose, Iii Don P Jason, Luke R Smart
{"title":"撒哈拉以南非洲地区儿科疼痛自评量表的验证:系统回顾。","authors":"Stephen Rineer, Derek Kwakye, Emmanuela E Ambrose, Iii Don P Jason, Luke R Smart","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Pediatric self-report pain scales must be validated in cultural/language contexts to provide optimal pain management. Sub-Saharan Africa included vast numbers of people groups, cultures, and languages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review sought to identify studies that validated a self-report pediatric pain scale within a sub-Saharan African context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed combining four concepts: children, pain, sub-Saharan Africa, and scales. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts for the inclusion criteria: English, prospective studies, a pediatric population, and conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Full text of qualifying citations was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1591 citations identified, six were included. Self-report pain scales included the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), Faces Pain Scale, McGill Questionnaire, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oucher Pain Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Validation characteristics varied from construct validity (two studies) to convergent validity (three studies) and discriminant validity (three studies). Methods included qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson/Spearman's correlation coefficients were strongest between self-report pain scales and weakest when compared to observational scales. The interview-based studies also assessed decision making process, comprehension, ease of use, pain perception, gender, and societal roles. Languages included were English, Afrikaans, Xhosa, Amharic, Swahili, Grammar English, Cameroonian Pidgin English and French.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>5 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have a self-report pediatric pain scale validated in their national language/context. Validation methods varied widely from qualitative to quantitative, including convergent, discriminant and face validity. Given the burden of pediatric pain in sub-Saharan Africa, further work is required to provide culturally appropriate and language-specific pain tools.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":"e103-e112"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of Pediatric Self-Report Pain Scales in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Rineer, Derek Kwakye, Emmanuela E Ambrose, Iii Don P Jason, Luke R Smart\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Pediatric self-report pain scales must be validated in cultural/language contexts to provide optimal pain management. Sub-Saharan Africa included vast numbers of people groups, cultures, and languages.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review sought to identify studies that validated a self-report pediatric pain scale within a sub-Saharan African context.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed combining four concepts: children, pain, sub-Saharan Africa, and scales. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts for the inclusion criteria: English, prospective studies, a pediatric population, and conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Full text of qualifying citations was obtained.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1591 citations identified, six were included. Self-report pain scales included the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), Faces Pain Scale, McGill Questionnaire, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oucher Pain Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Validation characteristics varied from construct validity (two studies) to convergent validity (three studies) and discriminant validity (three studies). Methods included qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson/Spearman's correlation coefficients were strongest between self-report pain scales and weakest when compared to observational scales. The interview-based studies also assessed decision making process, comprehension, ease of use, pain perception, gender, and societal roles. Languages included were English, Afrikaans, Xhosa, Amharic, Swahili, Grammar English, Cameroonian Pidgin English and French.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>5 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have a self-report pediatric pain scale validated in their national language/context. Validation methods varied widely from qualitative to quantitative, including convergent, discriminant and face validity. Given the burden of pediatric pain in sub-Saharan Africa, further work is required to provide culturally appropriate and language-specific pain tools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e103-e112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

小儿自我报告疼痛量表必须在文化/语言环境中进行验证,以提供最佳的疼痛管理。撒哈拉以南非洲地区包含大量的人群、文化和语言。本系统性综述旨在确定在撒哈拉以南非洲地区验证自我报告儿科疼痛量表的研究。我们检索了 CINAHL、EMBASE 和 PubMed,结合了四个概念:儿童、疼痛、撒哈拉以南非洲和量表。两位独立审稿人根据纳入标准对摘要进行了筛选:英语、前瞻性研究、儿科人群、在撒哈拉以南非洲地区进行。他们还获得了符合条件的引文全文。在确定的 1591 篇引文中,有 6 篇被纳入。自我报告疼痛量表包括面孔疼痛量表-修订版(FPS-R)、面孔疼痛量表、麦吉尔问卷、数字评定量表(NRS)、Oucher 疼痛量表和视觉模拟量表(VAS)。验证特点各不相同,有构造效度(2 项研究)、收敛效度(3 项研究)和判别效度(3 项研究)。方法包括定性和定量方法。自我报告疼痛量表之间的皮尔逊/斯皮尔曼相关系数最大,而与观察量表相比相关系数最小。基于访谈的研究还对决策过程、理解能力、易用性、疼痛感、性别和社会角色进行了评估。研究语言包括英语、南非荷兰语、科萨语、阿姆哈拉语、斯瓦希里语、语法英语、喀麦隆皮金英语和法语。撒哈拉以南非洲地区有 5 个国家的儿科疼痛自评量表已经过本国语言/语境的验证。从定性到定量,验证方法差异很大,包括收敛效度、判别效度和表面效度。鉴于撒哈拉以南非洲地区的儿科疼痛负担沉重,需要进一步开展工作,提供适合当地文化和语言的疼痛工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation of Pediatric Self-Report Pain Scales in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review.

Context: Pediatric self-report pain scales must be validated in cultural/language contexts to provide optimal pain management. Sub-Saharan Africa included vast numbers of people groups, cultures, and languages.

Objective: This systematic review sought to identify studies that validated a self-report pediatric pain scale within a sub-Saharan African context.

Method: We searched CINAHL, EMBASE, and PubMed combining four concepts: children, pain, sub-Saharan Africa, and scales. Two independent reviewers screened abstracts for the inclusion criteria: English, prospective studies, a pediatric population, and conducted in sub-Saharan Africa. Full text of qualifying citations was obtained.

Results: Of 1591 citations identified, six were included. Self-report pain scales included the Faces Pain Scale - Revised (FPS-R), Faces Pain Scale, McGill Questionnaire, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Oucher Pain Scale and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Validation characteristics varied from construct validity (two studies) to convergent validity (three studies) and discriminant validity (three studies). Methods included qualitative and quantitative approaches. Pearson/Spearman's correlation coefficients were strongest between self-report pain scales and weakest when compared to observational scales. The interview-based studies also assessed decision making process, comprehension, ease of use, pain perception, gender, and societal roles. Languages included were English, Afrikaans, Xhosa, Amharic, Swahili, Grammar English, Cameroonian Pidgin English and French.

Conclusion: 5 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa have a self-report pediatric pain scale validated in their national language/context. Validation methods varied widely from qualitative to quantitative, including convergent, discriminant and face validity. Given the burden of pediatric pain in sub-Saharan Africa, further work is required to provide culturally appropriate and language-specific pain tools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信