哮喘的固定气流阻塞可通过低 FEF25-75% 早期识别,并与环境暴露有关。

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/JAA.S479215
Ziheng Chen, Jinxin Ma, Jiahui Lei, Yi Li, Ruijuan Zhao, Limin Zhao
{"title":"哮喘的固定气流阻塞可通过低 FEF25-75% 早期识别,并与环境暴露有关。","authors":"Ziheng Chen, Jinxin Ma, Jiahui Lei, Yi Li, Ruijuan Zhao, Limin Zhao","doi":"10.2147/JAA.S479215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify environmental risk factors associated with asthmatic fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and assess the relationship between small airway abnormalities defined by forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) and FAO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 312 han Chinese patients with stable asthma on standard treatment. Low FEF25-75% was defined as post-bronchodilator FEF25-75% z-score <-0.8435, and FAO as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC z-score <-1.645. Exposure levels were retrospectively analyzed in relation to FAO risk in asthmatics. Asthmatics were grouped by low FEF25-75% and FAO, and lung function, environmental exposure, daily symptoms, and exacerbations in the previous year were compared cross-sectionally across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In retrospective analyses, pack-years of smoking in male patients (adjusted odd ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], <i>P</i><0.001), biomass exposure for >20 years (2.65 [1.13-6.43], <i>P</i>=0.027), occupational exposure for >10 years (2.01 [1.06-3.86], <i>P</i>=0.035) and occupational exposure for >20 years (2.67 [1.24-5.91], <i>P</i>=0.013) were associated with asthmatic FAO. In cross-sectional analyses, compared with the normal FEF25-75%/ asthmatics without FAO (NON-FAO) group, the low FEF25-75%/ asthmatics with FAO (FAO) group had lower FEV1 z-scores and FEV1/FVC z-scores, more pack-years and years of biomass and occupational exposure, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores, and more frequent exacerbations. The low FEF25-75%/NON-FAO group showed the same trend, but to a lesser extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic airway inflammation is not the only driver of asthmatic FAO, and management and treatment targeting environmental risk factors (smoking and biomass and occupational exposures) may slow FAO progression in asthmatics. The FEF25-75% determined by the z-score is a reliable marker of small airway abnormalities, and patients with low FEF25-75% are at greater risk for FAO, requiring more frequent follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":15079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","volume":"17 ","pages":"1001-1014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fixed Airflow Obstruction in Asthma Can Be Identified Early by Low FEF25-75% and is Associated with Environmental Exposure.\",\"authors\":\"Ziheng Chen, Jinxin Ma, Jiahui Lei, Yi Li, Ruijuan Zhao, Limin Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JAA.S479215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to identify environmental risk factors associated with asthmatic fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and assess the relationship between small airway abnormalities defined by forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) and FAO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 312 han Chinese patients with stable asthma on standard treatment. Low FEF25-75% was defined as post-bronchodilator FEF25-75% z-score <-0.8435, and FAO as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC z-score <-1.645. Exposure levels were retrospectively analyzed in relation to FAO risk in asthmatics. Asthmatics were grouped by low FEF25-75% and FAO, and lung function, environmental exposure, daily symptoms, and exacerbations in the previous year were compared cross-sectionally across groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In retrospective analyses, pack-years of smoking in male patients (adjusted odd ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], <i>P</i><0.001), biomass exposure for >20 years (2.65 [1.13-6.43], <i>P</i>=0.027), occupational exposure for >10 years (2.01 [1.06-3.86], <i>P</i>=0.035) and occupational exposure for >20 years (2.67 [1.24-5.91], <i>P</i>=0.013) were associated with asthmatic FAO. In cross-sectional analyses, compared with the normal FEF25-75%/ asthmatics without FAO (NON-FAO) group, the low FEF25-75%/ asthmatics with FAO (FAO) group had lower FEV1 z-scores and FEV1/FVC z-scores, more pack-years and years of biomass and occupational exposure, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores, and more frequent exacerbations. The low FEF25-75%/NON-FAO group showed the same trend, but to a lesser extent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chronic airway inflammation is not the only driver of asthmatic FAO, and management and treatment targeting environmental risk factors (smoking and biomass and occupational exposures) may slow FAO progression in asthmatics. The FEF25-75% determined by the z-score is a reliable marker of small airway abnormalities, and patients with low FEF25-75% are at greater risk for FAO, requiring more frequent follow-up.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"1001-1014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asthma and Allergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S479215\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ALLERGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asthma and Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S479215","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在确定与哮喘固定气流阻塞(FAO)相关的环境风险因素,并评估以25-75%强迫呼气流量(FEF25-75%)定义的小气道异常与FAO之间的关系:我们分析了312名接受标准治疗、病情稳定的中国汉族哮喘患者的数据。低 FEF25-75% 被定义为支气管扩张剂后 FEF25-75% Z 分数:在回顾性分析中,男性患者的吸烟包年(调整后的奇异比[95% 置信区间]为 1.05 [1.03-1.07],P20 年(2.65 [1.13-6.43],P=0.027)、大于 10 年的职业接触(2.01 [1.06-3.86],P=0.035)和大于 20 年的职业接触(2.67 [1.24-5.91],P=0.013)与哮喘性 FAO 相关。在横断面分析中,与正常 FEF25-75%/ 无 FAO 的哮喘患者(NON-FAO)组相比,低 FEF25-75%/ 有 FAO 的哮喘患者(FAO)组的 FEV1 z scores 和 FEV1/FVC z scores 更低、吸烟包年数更多以及生物质和职业暴露年数更多,哮喘控制问卷-5 和慢性阻塞性肺病评估测试评分更高,病情加重更频繁。低FEF25-75%/NON-FAO组显示出同样的趋势,但程度较轻:结论:慢性气道炎症并不是哮喘患者 FAO 的唯一驱动因素,针对环境风险因素(吸烟、生物质和职业暴露)的管理和治疗可减缓哮喘患者 FAO 的进展。通过z-score确定的FEF25-75%是小气道异常的可靠标志,FEF25-75%低的患者发生FAO的风险更大,需要更频繁地进行随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fixed Airflow Obstruction in Asthma Can Be Identified Early by Low FEF25-75% and is Associated with Environmental Exposure.

Purpose: This study aimed to identify environmental risk factors associated with asthmatic fixed airflow obstruction (FAO) and assess the relationship between small airway abnormalities defined by forced expiratory flow at 25-75% (FEF25-75%) and FAO.

Patients and methods: We analyzed data from 312 han Chinese patients with stable asthma on standard treatment. Low FEF25-75% was defined as post-bronchodilator FEF25-75% z-score <-0.8435, and FAO as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC z-score <-1.645. Exposure levels were retrospectively analyzed in relation to FAO risk in asthmatics. Asthmatics were grouped by low FEF25-75% and FAO, and lung function, environmental exposure, daily symptoms, and exacerbations in the previous year were compared cross-sectionally across groups.

Results: In retrospective analyses, pack-years of smoking in male patients (adjusted odd ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.05 [1.03-1.07], P<0.001), biomass exposure for >20 years (2.65 [1.13-6.43], P=0.027), occupational exposure for >10 years (2.01 [1.06-3.86], P=0.035) and occupational exposure for >20 years (2.67 [1.24-5.91], P=0.013) were associated with asthmatic FAO. In cross-sectional analyses, compared with the normal FEF25-75%/ asthmatics without FAO (NON-FAO) group, the low FEF25-75%/ asthmatics with FAO (FAO) group had lower FEV1 z-scores and FEV1/FVC z-scores, more pack-years and years of biomass and occupational exposure, higher Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test scores, and more frequent exacerbations. The low FEF25-75%/NON-FAO group showed the same trend, but to a lesser extent.

Conclusion: Chronic airway inflammation is not the only driver of asthmatic FAO, and management and treatment targeting environmental risk factors (smoking and biomass and occupational exposures) may slow FAO progression in asthmatics. The FEF25-75% determined by the z-score is a reliable marker of small airway abnormalities, and patients with low FEF25-75% are at greater risk for FAO, requiring more frequent follow-up.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Asthma and Allergy
Journal of Asthma and Allergy Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
185
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, reports, editorials and commentaries on the following topics: Asthma; Pulmonary physiology; Asthma related clinical health; Clinical immunology and the immunological basis of disease; Pharmacological interventions and new therapies. Although the main focus of the journal will be to publish research and clinical results in humans, preclinical, animal and in vitro studies will be published where they shed light on disease processes and potential new therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信