医学物理学家的晋升和终身职位应基于文章的具体衡量标准,而不是期刊影响因子。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Samantha Hedrick, Jinzhong Yang, Yi Rong
{"title":"医学物理学家的晋升和终身职位应基于文章的具体衡量标准,而不是期刊影响因子。","authors":"Samantha Hedrick,&nbsp;Jinzhong Yang,&nbsp;Yi Rong","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14537","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the evolving progress of academic medicine, the metrics by which we measure success are both crucial and contentious. Among these, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has long been a dominant metric, often serving as a shorthand for the quality and significance of research. For many institutions, JIF plays a pivotal role in decisions regarding promotion, tenure, and funding, positioning it as a key indicator of academic achievement. However, as we delve deeper into the complexities of scholarly impact, questions arise: Is the JIF truly a fair measure of quality of an individual author or value of their article? Or should we, instead, focus on article-specific metrics that more accurately reflect the true impact of the work? This month's debate seeks to explore these questions from both perspectives. We have Dr. Samantha Hedrick, who argues in favor of article-specific measures as a more accurate reflection of scholarly contribution, while Dr. Jinzhong Yang defends the established role of the JIF as a useful, if imperfect, tool in academic evaluation.</p><p>Samantha Hedrick, PhD, DABR received her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla and received her M.S. and PhD in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri. She then completed a two-year CAMPEP accredited residency at Washington University in St. Louis. She is currently the Director of Medical Physics at the Thompson Proton Center, specializing in pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning, scripting, and safety improvements.</p><p>Jinzhong Yang, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Radiation Physics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. He is the lead physicist of the MR-Linac program at MD Anderson. He earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University in 2006 and received a postdoctoral training at University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on artificial intelligence in medical image computing for radiation oncology applications, MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy, and quantitative imaging biomarkers for treatment outcome prediction. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal articles, nine book chapters, and edited a book.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633813/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promotion and tenure for medical physicists should be based on article specific measures and not on journal impact factor\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Hedrick,&nbsp;Jinzhong Yang,&nbsp;Yi Rong\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14537\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the evolving progress of academic medicine, the metrics by which we measure success are both crucial and contentious. Among these, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has long been a dominant metric, often serving as a shorthand for the quality and significance of research. For many institutions, JIF plays a pivotal role in decisions regarding promotion, tenure, and funding, positioning it as a key indicator of academic achievement. However, as we delve deeper into the complexities of scholarly impact, questions arise: Is the JIF truly a fair measure of quality of an individual author or value of their article? Or should we, instead, focus on article-specific metrics that more accurately reflect the true impact of the work? This month's debate seeks to explore these questions from both perspectives. We have Dr. Samantha Hedrick, who argues in favor of article-specific measures as a more accurate reflection of scholarly contribution, while Dr. Jinzhong Yang defends the established role of the JIF as a useful, if imperfect, tool in academic evaluation.</p><p>Samantha Hedrick, PhD, DABR received her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla and received her M.S. and PhD in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri. She then completed a two-year CAMPEP accredited residency at Washington University in St. Louis. She is currently the Director of Medical Physics at the Thompson Proton Center, specializing in pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning, scripting, and safety improvements.</p><p>Jinzhong Yang, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Radiation Physics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. He is the lead physicist of the MR-Linac program at MD Anderson. He earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University in 2006 and received a postdoctoral training at University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on artificial intelligence in medical image computing for radiation oncology applications, MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy, and quantitative imaging biomarkers for treatment outcome prediction. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal articles, nine book chapters, and edited a book.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11633813/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14537\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14537","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在学术医学不断发展的过程中,我们衡量成功的标准既关键又有争议。其中,期刊影响因子(JIF)长期以来一直是一个占主导地位的指标,通常作为研究质量和意义的简写。对于许多机构来说,JIF在有关晋升、任期和资助的决策中起着关键作用,将其定位为学术成就的关键指标。然而,当我们深入研究学术影响的复杂性时,问题出现了:JIF真的是衡量单个作者的质量或文章价值的公平标准吗?或者,我们应该专注于更准确地反映工作的真实影响的特定于文章的度量?本月的辩论试图从两个角度探讨这些问题。我们有Samantha Hedrick博士,她认为文章特定的衡量标准可以更准确地反映学术贡献,而Jinzhong Yang博士则认为JIF是一个有用的学术评估工具,尽管它并不完美。Samantha Hedrick,博士,DABR,在密苏里大学罗拉分校获得核工程学士学位,在密苏里大学获得核工程硕士和博士学位。随后,她在圣路易斯华盛顿大学完成了为期两年的CAMPEP认证实习。她目前是汤普森质子中心的医学物理主任,专门从事铅笔束扫描质子治疗的治疗计划、脚本编写和安全改进。杨金忠博士是德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心放射物理系的助理教授。他是MD安德森林肯先生项目的首席物理学家。他于2006年获得利哈伊大学电气工程博士学位,并在宾夕法尼亚大学接受博士后培训。他的研究主要集中在放射肿瘤学应用的医学图像计算中的人工智能,核磁共振引导的在线自适应放疗,以及用于治疗结果预测的定量成像生物标志物。他发表了130多篇同行评议的期刊文章,9个书籍章节,并编辑了一本书。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Promotion and tenure for medical physicists should be based on article specific measures and not on journal impact factor

In the evolving progress of academic medicine, the metrics by which we measure success are both crucial and contentious. Among these, the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has long been a dominant metric, often serving as a shorthand for the quality and significance of research. For many institutions, JIF plays a pivotal role in decisions regarding promotion, tenure, and funding, positioning it as a key indicator of academic achievement. However, as we delve deeper into the complexities of scholarly impact, questions arise: Is the JIF truly a fair measure of quality of an individual author or value of their article? Or should we, instead, focus on article-specific metrics that more accurately reflect the true impact of the work? This month's debate seeks to explore these questions from both perspectives. We have Dr. Samantha Hedrick, who argues in favor of article-specific measures as a more accurate reflection of scholarly contribution, while Dr. Jinzhong Yang defends the established role of the JIF as a useful, if imperfect, tool in academic evaluation.

Samantha Hedrick, PhD, DABR received her B.S. in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri-Rolla and received her M.S. and PhD in Nuclear Engineering from the University of Missouri. She then completed a two-year CAMPEP accredited residency at Washington University in St. Louis. She is currently the Director of Medical Physics at the Thompson Proton Center, specializing in pencil beam scanning proton therapy treatment planning, scripting, and safety improvements.

Jinzhong Yang, PhD is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Radiation Physics at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. He is the lead physicist of the MR-Linac program at MD Anderson. He earned his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Lehigh University in 2006 and received a postdoctoral training at University of Pennsylvania. His research focuses on artificial intelligence in medical image computing for radiation oncology applications, MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy, and quantitative imaging biomarkers for treatment outcome prediction. He has published over 130 peer-reviewed journal articles, nine book chapters, and edited a book.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信